Some of these post sound just like the media. My biggest problem is the perceived notion that if you were good for several years in a row you are a good team forever. FSU is a top 30 or so team on the feild and so are the Bulls. The difference is the history of FSU has the media and apparantly some posters thinking they are still better. This game in my opinion would be a toss up. To say FSU will continue to stay near the top because they have a top 20 recruiting class is asinine. This is just like ranking the top 25 pre-season, and when a highly ranked team has a bad year and ends with 5 or 6 losses still refering to them as a top team. My point is ranking before a kid plays is just an opinion, eduated opinion maybe, but with the number of high school seniors in the country it may not be that educated. FSU has had top 20 recruiting classes for many years and yet the records over the last five years do not compare to their record the previous 5 years. 2005 8-5 2004 9-3 2003 10-3 2002 9-5 2001 8-4 prior to 2001 they were used to 2 loss seasons being a bad year. My point is we are catching them at a much faster rate than many believe. (On the field anyway, the media will always be years behind, lets face it they though ND would compete for the national title, history had something to do with that prediction) The reason we are catching up is because of their depth. If healthy their starters on a whole are better than ours. (but you don't go through an entire football season without injury). We have taken some kids that would have started for FSU or Miami, and we have taken most of the kids that would have been the second string). So when they have injuries, like FSU has, they fall fast. Just my opinion, and like always, GO BULLS!