USFbulls24

Thank you very much!

(3) This offense, as being called now, is WAY too complicated for our talent. The staff, to their credit, has dumbed it down minimally, but it is just not enough. I get that you want to install a system, but lets go piece by piece. Guys don’t know who they need to block. QBs can’t figure out timing. These guys are mostly built for the spread, lets go slow. We’ve got the nation’s 12th leading rusher in our backfield. Figure out a way to use him to improve the passing game. This is right on the money and I have said the same thing over the last few weeks. This season is already a loss regardless if we've started our conference schedule or not. We're not even going to be competitive running a foreign system with players not even close to built for it. You've taught it to the team all spring, continue to teach it in practice, and you even run it in the games BUT at the same time run some plays that do cater to our players. That doesn't mean abandon your philosophy either. It means give the players some confidence and mix in some other things. We're going to be so bad this year we can afford to let them learn slowly and surely. It's not like we've got a chance at a conference championship or a bowl game using only Taggart's power run system. why do people think these players can magically run another offense? THEY SCORED 1 TD IN 3 GAMES LAST YEAR RUNNING THE OFFENSE THEY WERE RECRUITED FOR. AN OFFENSE THEY HAD BEEN RUNNING FOR NEARLY 3 YEARS. that was with years of experience in the system. maybe just maybe they aren't good at running ANY offense. Do you actually read what is written or do you read what you want? Running a play or two is not running ANOTHER OFFENSE lol. It's running a play or two without 3 TE's on the field... what caters to our players? should we spread 5 wide? our Qb ran the veer in high school. he only had 11 TD passes his senior year and that was far more than he had ever had in a season. should we run the veer then? why do people think it's the play calls. I'm honestly not sure what exactly caters to our players but I can tell you WHAT DOESN'T, - Willie Taggarts power run offense. As a coach thats something he should know. I don't know man... maybe I'm way off but I think running this power run offense, and getting pounded every game can't exactly be a confidence builder for our players. Like I said i'm not saying to abandon the philosophy at all. Just throw in a few other plays here and there. WHY NOT? Do a trick play, do 1 play where its spread out 5 wide and instead of throwing the ball do a QB draw up the middle. I don't know. so a power run offense where our RB is averaging over 7 yards per carry doesn't cater to our strengths and isn't working???? he is #10 in the country and you want to abandon it to go 5 wide with a veer QB and an offensive line that's strength isn't pass blocking? Once again... you do not read what is written and read what you want to read. I said run a FEW PLAYS A GAME where it is not a power run style. Why in the world do you take that and turn it into me saying I want to abandon it? Pretty sure I said this multiple times "Like I said i'm not saying to abandon the philosophy at all". We have 6 total offensive TDs through 4 games.... If you're happy with that then we shouldn't even be having this conversation. Marcus Shaw is a stud and we should feed him every chance we get. I am not really sure why you're having trouble grasping the concept of running a few plays that aren't typical of a Willie Taggart Offense instead of going into you think I mean abandon the power run offense and go spread? honestly I'm having trouble grasping why you want to get away from what's actually working at all. if anything he should be running Shaw even more. I don't think he can hold up though if he does run him more. if you meant to say he should run some trick plays then sure. I guess. don't think it will do much good though. It's kind of hard to run the ball when you're already down 20+ points every game in the 2nd half

(3) This offense, as being called now, is WAY too complicated for our talent. The staff, to their credit, has dumbed it down minimally, but it is just not enough. I get that you want to install a system, but lets go piece by piece. Guys don’t know who they need to block. QBs can’t figure out timing. These guys are mostly built for the spread, lets go slow. We’ve got the nation’s 12th leading rusher in our backfield. Figure out a way to use him to improve the passing game. This is right on the money and I have said the same thing over the last few weeks. This season is already a loss regardless if we've started our conference schedule or not. We're not even going to be competitive running a foreign system with players not even close to built for it. You've taught it to the team all spring, continue to teach it in practice, and you even run it in the games BUT at the same time run some plays that do cater to our players. That doesn't mean abandon your philosophy either. It means give the players some confidence and mix in some other things. We're going to be so bad this year we can afford to let them learn slowly and surely. It's not like we've got a chance at a conference championship or a bowl game using only Taggart's power run system. why do people think these players can magically run another offense? THEY SCORED 1 TD IN 3 GAMES LAST YEAR RUNNING THE OFFENSE THEY WERE RECRUITED FOR. AN OFFENSE THEY HAD BEEN RUNNING FOR NEARLY 3 YEARS. that was with years of experience in the system. maybe just maybe they aren't good at running ANY offense. Do you actually read what is written or do you read what you want? Running a play or two is not running ANOTHER OFFENSE lol. It's running a play or two without 3 TE's on the field... what caters to our players? should we spread 5 wide? our Qb ran the veer in high school. he only had 11 TD passes his senior year and that was far more than he had ever had in a season. should we run the veer then? why do people think it's the play calls. I'm honestly not sure what exactly caters to our players but I can tell you WHAT DOESN'T, - Willie Taggarts power run offense. As a coach thats something he should know. I don't know man... maybe I'm way off but I think running this power run offense, and getting pounded every game can't exactly be a confidence builder for our players. Like I said i'm not saying to abandon the philosophy at all. Just throw in a few other plays here and there. WHY NOT? Do a trick play, do 1 play where its spread out 5 wide and instead of throwing the ball do a QB draw up the middle. I don't know. so a power run offense where our RB is averaging over 7 yards per carry doesn't cater to our strengths and isn't working???? he is #10 in the country and you want to abandon it to go 5 wide with a veer QB and an offensive line that's strength isn't pass blocking? Once again... you do not read what is written and read what you want to read. I said run a FEW PLAYS A GAME where it is not a power run style. Why in the world do you take that and turn it into me saying I want to abandon it? Pretty sure I said this multiple times "Like I said i'm not saying to abandon the philosophy at all". We have 6 total offensive TDs through 4 games.... If you're happy with that then we shouldn't even be having this conversation. Marcus Shaw is a stud and we should feed him every chance we get. I am not really sure why you're having trouble grasping the concept of running a few plays that aren't typical of a Willie Taggart Offense instead of going into you think I mean abandon the power run offense and go spread?

I guess no matter how bad it gets for us we don't have Skip Holtz anymore....AMEN

(3) This offense, as being called now, is WAY too complicated for our talent. The staff, to their credit, has dumbed it down minimally, but it is just not enough. I get that you want to install a system, but lets go piece by piece. Guys don’t know who they need to block. QBs can’t figure out timing. These guys are mostly built for the spread, lets go slow. We’ve got the nation’s 12th leading rusher in our backfield. Figure out a way to use him to improve the passing game. This is right on the money and I have said the same thing over the last few weeks. This season is already a loss regardless if we've started our conference schedule or not. We're not even going to be competitive running a foreign system with players not even close to built for it. You've taught it to the team all spring, continue to teach it in practice, and you even run it in the games BUT at the same time run some plays that do cater to our players. That doesn't mean abandon your philosophy either. It means give the players some confidence and mix in some other things. We're going to be so bad this year we can afford to let them learn slowly and surely. It's not like we've got a chance at a conference championship or a bowl game using only Taggart's power run system. why do people think these players can magically run another offense? THEY SCORED 1 TD IN 3 GAMES LAST YEAR RUNNING THE OFFENSE THEY WERE RECRUITED FOR. AN OFFENSE THEY HAD BEEN RUNNING FOR NEARLY 3 YEARS. that was with years of experience in the system. maybe just maybe they aren't good at running ANY offense. Do you actually read what is written or do you read what you want? Running a play or two is not running ANOTHER OFFENSE lol. It's running a play or two without 3 TE's on the field... what caters to our players? should we spread 5 wide? our Qb ran the veer in high school. he only had 11 TD passes his senior year and that was far more than he had ever had in a season. should we run the veer then? why do people think it's the play calls. I'm honestly not sure what exactly caters to our players but I can tell you WHAT DOESN'T, - Willie Taggarts power run offense. As a coach thats something he should know. I don't know man... maybe I'm way off but I think running this power run offense, and getting pounded every game can't exactly be a confidence builder for our players. Like I said i'm not saying to abandon the philosophy at all. Just throw in a few other plays here and there. WHY NOT? Do a trick play, do 1 play where its spread out 5 wide and instead of throwing the ball do a QB draw up the middle. I don't know.

(3) This offense, as being called now, is WAY too complicated for our talent. The staff, to their credit, has dumbed it down minimally, but it is just not enough. I get that you want to install a system, but lets go piece by piece. Guys don’t know who they need to block. QBs can’t figure out timing. These guys are mostly built for the spread, lets go slow. We’ve got the nation’s 12th leading rusher in our backfield. Figure out a way to use him to improve the passing game. This is right on the money and I have said the same thing over the last few weeks. This season is already a loss regardless if we've started our conference schedule or not. We're not even going to be competitive running a foreign system with players not even close to built for it. You've taught it to the team all spring, continue to teach it in practice, and you even run it in the games BUT at the same time run some plays that do cater to our players. That doesn't mean abandon your philosophy either. It means give the players some confidence and mix in some other things. We're going to be so bad this year we can afford to let them learn slowly and surely. It's not like we've got a chance at a conference championship or a bowl game using only Taggart's power run system. why do people think these players can magically run another offense? THEY SCORED 1 TD IN 3 GAMES LAST YEAR RUNNING THE OFFENSE THEY WERE RECRUITED FOR. AN OFFENSE THEY HAD BEEN RUNNING FOR NEARLY 3 YEARS. that was with years of experience in the system. maybe just maybe they aren't good at running ANY offense. Do you actually read what is written or do you read what you want? Running a play or two is not running ANOTHER OFFENSE lol. It's running a play or two without 3 TE's on the field...

you keep blaming coaches but you show no proof. are there better staffs out there? absolutely. can we afford them? not even close. do I think they could do much better with what we have? maybe a little better but not much. just please tell me what the coaches could have done differently to change the outcome of those games when your hands are tied offensively and there are so many gift scores to the opponent. we lost by double digits to mcneese state and fau because our QB play is atrocious. you can't turn the ball over for scores and expect to win especially when our QB play is so bad. I've shown plenty of proof, you choose to ignore it. It's not worth it because you're one of maybe 5 people in this world who believe McNeese State has more talent than USF you haven't shown any proof at all that those losses were caused by coaching errors. you're naive enough to believe that a top 10 d 1-aa program, loaded with transfers from better 1-a programs, can't be more talented at crucial positions than a bottom of the barrel d 1-a program. there are plenty of top 1-aa programs that are more talented football teams then we are. I bet north dakota state would beat close to half of all d-1a teams including kansas state who won the big 12 last year. So... it wasn't Willie Taggart that chose Matt Floyd as our starting QB to start the season after seeing the kid couldn't even take a snap last season? Not to mention his 0 TD to 7 or 8 turnover ratio in 3 games? Or was that the players fault/choice? Was it Willie Taggart's choice to bring out Floyd to start the 2nd half of the McNeese State game after he was absolutely horrendous the first half and the first play throws another INT? Or was that the players decision/fault too? (I am not saying we would of won the game with another QB playing but I'll bet you we wouldn't of lost by 32 points..) You're absolutely blind if you think that coaching is not to blame at all. Taggart was left with an awful awful awful awful AWFUL team, but with that it is better than what McNeese State and FAU have. If you disagree with that that's fine. You could even say we're so bad McNeese State and FAU have the same amount of talent as USF right now which goes to show you that getting blown out by them is a coaching issue. Coaches come up with the game plans. They decide what players play and what plays to run. They are supposed to prepare the team for the opponent each week. (He gets a pass for Miami, we had no chance whether he is the best coach in the nation or not) Not executing on a play or two can cost you a game but losing by a combined 50 points to McNeese State and FAU at home is a coaching issue. Willie Taggart tried to get a transfer QB from Arkansas, a transfer QB from FSU and eventually did get one from Penn state. he knew what he had on the roster. neither Floyd or Eveld were a descent option. sure Eveld threw for a couple of Tds against mcneese in garbage time but Floyd onbviously had more upside so i guess he was hoping it would work out. I love people who claim a team is better especially after they were beat by the team they are claiming they are better than. we are not better than mcneese state or FAU. getting blown out by them was a turnover and QB issue. sure not executing on a play or two. keep telling yourself that. Not executing on a play or two what are you talking about? You obviously didn't understand what I was saying. I am saying if we were losing close games to FAU or McNeese State due to a few plays that just weren't executed by players than you have a point, BUT maybe you're not aware but WE'RE getting BLOWN out by FAU and McNeese State lol. You're also saying that teams that are better than their opponents NEVER LOSE? Haha what are you talking about? You think that the New York Giants back in 2007 were a better team than the New England 18-0 Patriots? NO. They were not better. For that game they were. In 2006 when USF beat #2 ranked West Virginia one game away from a national championship berth we were better than West Virginia? NO. We were better that game due to a better game plan, better coaching, or the football gods were with us that day. The Knicks beat the Heat last season in basketball. Does that make them a better team than the Heat? NO. Getting blown out was a QB issue? WE GAVE UP OVER 40 POINTS to McNeese State on Defense. They had over 400 yards of total offense. That falls on the QB and turnovers? Take off your Willie Taggart goggles for a second and think about this logically. Taggart is in a terrible situation and anyone thinking he should have a winning season this year is fooling themselves. What you're failing to see is that we should not get blown out by a team like that or FAU and it does fall on coaching and the lack of talent. I'd put a 50/50 split on the blame. Half to the coaches and half to the lack of talent. You put a good X's and O's coach on our sidelines and I guarantee you we don't lose by a combined 50 points to those teams. Because he would come up with a game plan to make sure it didn't happen.

(3) This offense, as being called now, is WAY too complicated for our talent. The staff, to their credit, has dumbed it down minimally, but it is just not enough. I get that you want to install a system, but lets go piece by piece. Guys don’t know who they need to block. QBs can’t figure out timing. These guys are mostly built for the spread, lets go slow. We’ve got the nation’s 12th leading rusher in our backfield. Figure out a way to use him to improve the passing game. This is right on the money and I have said the same thing over the last few weeks. This season is already a loss regardless if we've started our conference schedule or not. We're not even going to be competitive running a foreign system with players not even close to built for it. You've taught it to the team all spring, continue to teach it in practice, and you even run it in the games BUT at the same time run some plays that do cater to our players. That doesn't mean abandon your philosophy either. It means give the players some confidence and mix in some other things. We're going to be so bad this year we can afford to let them learn slowly and surely. It's not like we've got a chance at a conference championship or a bowl game using only Taggart's power run system.

you keep blaming coaches but you show no proof. are there better staffs out there? absolutely. can we afford them? not even close. do I think they could do much better with what we have? maybe a little better but not much. just please tell me what the coaches could have done differently to change the outcome of those games when your hands are tied offensively and there are so many gift scores to the opponent. we lost by double digits to mcneese state and fau because our QB play is atrocious. you can't turn the ball over for scores and expect to win especially when our QB play is so bad. I've shown plenty of proof, you choose to ignore it. It's not worth it because you're one of maybe 5 people in this world who believe McNeese State has more talent than USF you haven't shown any proof at all that those losses were caused by coaching errors. you're naive enough to believe that a top 10 d 1-aa program, loaded with transfers from better 1-a programs, can't be more talented at crucial positions than a bottom of the barrel d 1-a program. there are plenty of top 1-aa programs that are more talented football teams then we are. I bet north dakota state would beat close to half of all d-1a teams including kansas state who won the big 12 last year. So... it wasn't Willie Taggart that chose Matt Floyd as our starting QB to start the season after seeing the kid couldn't even take a snap last season? Not to mention his 0 TD to 7 or 8 turnover ratio in 3 games? Or was that the players fault/choice? Was it Willie Taggart's choice to bring out Floyd to start the 2nd half of the McNeese State game after he was absolutely horrendous the first half and the first play throws another INT? Or was that the players decision/fault too? (I am not saying we would of won the game with another QB playing but I'll bet you we wouldn't of lost by 32 points..) You're absolutely blind if you think that coaching is not to blame at all. Taggart was left with an awful awful awful awful AWFUL team, but with that it is better than what McNeese State and FAU have. If you disagree with that that's fine. You could even say we're so bad McNeese State and FAU have the same amount of talent as USF right now which goes to show you that getting blown out by them is a coaching issue. Coaches come up with the game plans. They decide what players play and what plays to run. They are supposed to prepare the team for the opponent each week. (He gets a pass for Miami, we had no chance whether he is the best coach in the nation or not) Not executing on a play or two can cost you a game but losing by a combined 50 points to McNeese State and FAU at home is a coaching issue.

^ what were u smoking when u decided to become a Giants fan? 0-4 bahahaha! 2 Super Bowls in the last 6 years tastes pretty good.... Who is your team big dog?

Say no to drugs

McNeese has more talent then us...go take a look at their roster my friend. FAU is probably on par with us right now and we had that game, if not for some untimely turnovers I think we actually pull that win out. We are moving in the right direction that is all we can hope for at this point. Coach T is giving his all to win here. I could only imagine what it must feel like to want to win so bad at your home University and just don't have the horses to compete week in and week out. We're moving in the right direction..? Lol I mean other than getting rid of Skip Holtz which was definitely moving in the right direction what in the heck have we done this season that makes you think that?

Why is he your guy? I want to look forward to next season but I am having trouble. Here is what I like about Taggart- 1) He was an athlete, and a **** good one. He BEAT USF as a quarterback of Western Kentucky in 1998. Yea that was 15 years ago, but it still happened. I was at that game. Players need someone they can respect. Taggart is a respectable man, he has the past experience to earn that respect, and he still looks like he's in **** good physical shape right now. He's not some 280 pound overweight coach, he still looks like he can wear pads and knock helmets. 2) He's from Bradenton, and he's not stranger to Florida culture. We all know the state of Florida is a hot bed of talent, the fact that he went to high school 30 minutes from our main campus certainly gives him an edge to this area. He talks like Florida people talk. 3) Look at his history - Western Kentucky lost 20 STRAIGHT games before he came in as coach. You think life sucks as a USF fan when you're 0 and 4? Western Kentucky lost TWENTY (yes, 20) straight games before he took over. WKU 2007 - 5 wins, 7 losses WKU 2008 - 2 wins, 10 losses WKU 2009 - 0 wins, 12 losses WKU 2010 - 2 wins 10 losses (Taggarts First Year) WKU 2011 - 7 wins, 5 losses (Taggarts Second Year) WKU 2012 - 7 wins, 6 losses (Taggarts Third Year) 2012 WKU was invited to the Papa John's Bowl, and lost to Central Michigan 21 to 24. See his stats for yourself- http://www.totalfootballstats.com/WesternKentuckyHilltoppers.asp Right now, USF is playing WKU's 2008/2009 Season. Just like history proved, our 2014 season will most likely be like WKU's 2010 season, our 2015 season will be like WKU's 2011 season, and our 2016 season will be like WKU's 2012 season. Taggart is ABSOLUTELY the right man for this job. You can't make chicken soup out of chicken poop, and I'm not saying that's the quality of our players, but our program is in shambles after the "Holtz New Era". Give this man some breathing room, he has the tools, the field knowledge and the commitment to turning programs around. He already did it to a team that lost 20 straight games, and he took them from 20 straight losses to a bowl where they lost by a field goal. Show some support, and give this man some breathing room so he can work. Taggart is not going to build the "rugby" style offense that allowed us to squeak by teams in the past. That whole "have the quarterback scramble for 200 yards a game, then panic when he gets hurt" offense is not how you build a succesful program. Yea it's winning... till 80% of your offense gets injured. Just let him do his thing, we're in the suck right now, and there is no better person than Taggart to pull us out of it. He's been here before, he's got ties to this area so he's not going to dodge out and leave us. He'll fix us up You make some really good points.. HOWEVER, I think you're a little off. The man is an unbelievable recruiter. He got kids that had no business going to Western Kentucky to Western Kentucky. He has kids wanting to go to USF after what has transpired over the last 4 years to commit to USF over huge huge programs that make you scratch your head why they would choose us over Miami or FSU etc. If you can simply get better players and more talent on the field, regardless of what kind of coach you are when you're playing Austin Peay, Middle Tennessee State, North Texas, FIU, and Luisiana Lafayette you're going to win some football games. With that being said, I am not saying AAC is anything to write home about because compared to the Big East its an absolute tragedy of a conference but if you can't COACH you're not going to beat teams in our conference. He has shown absolutely NOTHING to fans and our school that he is a "good coach". He couldn't even put together a game plan to compete with Mcneese State and FAU. He has the running game going and that's it. But we run the ball 30+ times a game with 2 and 3 TE sets of course we're going to see some kind of success running the football lol. And that's to take nothing away from Shaw, he is awesome. Seeing him do this just shows you even more how INCOMPETENT of a coach Skip Holtz is that Shaw has been sitting on our sidelines the last few years. I don't think he can coach X's and O's good enough to take USF football to where fans want to go. At least he'll leave our program with talent because he is a hell of a recruiter compared to where Holtz left it....

Buying into the offense... the absolute worst line coaches use as well as fans. You think that the players aren't bought in? They are football players! They do as the coach says and as the play says regardless if they like the offense or not because if they don't they wouldn't be on the field. The offense is not going to work against good teams and it isn't even working against McNeese State and FAU (I'll chalk that up to awful oline and QB play) but big time programs such as Miami like they did last week will embarrass us trying to run this crap.

He took over a terrible team but that terrible team has more talent than McNeese State and FAU. Taggart has shown thus far that he cannot coach football. Hopefully he changes that the rest of this season. I won't be holding my breath though,....

completely agree.

Not liking them is understandable, they deserve it. But their program is in a good place and rising--wouldn't call that a bad program. They may not be "bad" but when looking at college football as a whole they certainly aren't a "good" program. How can you possibly be impressed with them by the teams they have been beating during their successful seasons. Sorry I can't be when you look at it..

So tell me. How did Skip and Doug enable UCF an 11 win season, conference and division championships and top 25 end of year rankings when they beat UGA in their bowl game? In other words, all the things USF fans wanted when Leavitt was here he couldn't do. So tell me what in the world you are talking about....? By me saying that "unfortunately with the combination of Skip Holtz and Doug Woulard has absolutely buried us" how do you take that as me saying that Skip and Doug "enabled" UCF to an 11 win season a conference and division championship?? NO. It's saying Holtz and Woulard buried us and that has nothing to do with UCF. Lets be realistic as well. They played in one of the worst conferences in football. Let's break down their 10 wins last year and who they were against: Akron (1-11), FIU (3-9), East Carolina (8-5), Southern Miss (0-12), Memphis (4-8), Marshall (5-7), SMU (0-12), UTEP (3-9), UAB (3-9), and Ball State (9-4). Lets break down their 11 win season and who they were against: South Dakota University (4-7), Buffalo University (2-10), UAB (4-8), Marshall (5-7), Rice (4-8), East Carolina (6-7), Houston (5-7), Tulane (4-8), Memphis (1-11), SMU (7-7), and a 6-7 god awful Georgia team. THEY DIDN'T BEAT 1 TEAM ALL YEAR WITH A WINNING RECORD and you're impressed with that season? Give me a break! Look at that cake walk of a schedule. So out of those 21 wins their best win was against Georgia which is a decent win but they really were so bad that season, but even so we can tip our cap to them for that. So they beat 2 teams with a winning record over the course of 2010 and 2012 and those were against East Carolina and Ball State. In 2011 they went (5-7). And I am supposed to be IMPRESSED? Give me a break!

Every UCF fan has been drooling at the chance to play USF again. I remember the year we won 64-12 every UCF fan thought they deserved to be on the same field as us and they didn't. Leavitt wanted to move away from playing UCF and for a good reason. They are not a good program. And unfortunately with the combination of Skip Holtz and Doug Woulard has absolutely buried us and given UCF a chance at being on the same level..

Even if UCF does pull off this win they still aren't close to the amount of very good quality programs that USF has beaten. They have beaten a terrible Georgia team a few years back who finished like 6-7, I guess you can add a sanctioned (pretty bad team for their standards) Penn State team , an overrated ranked University of Houston team, and South Carolina. 2 total wins vs ranked teams in their history. Pretty comical..

I'm with you on this. Just taking it one game at a time. As bad as it is now, it can't get worse and it will get better. Bench will continue to learn the offense as well as the rest of the team. Our Defense is not bad at all. If we can figure out a way to score some points between now and Thanksgiving then I think it'll be a close game. But even with that said I don't think we'll win simply because they're a better team this year, but who knows. Lets also remember that UCF has a stud RB who has no business being anywhere near that campus. Storm Johnson transferred from the University of Miami for who knows what reason.

Take a breath Cram... they beat Akron, FIU and a decimated PSU team.... Agreed. If "pulled it together" means beating the teams they have beaten and able to compete with a team like Penn St who is nothing what they used to be and on sanctions then who cares.The win at Penn St is a good win but it is not an eye opener like @ Auburn or @ WV when they're ranked #2 and one win away from a National Championship berth etc. We will see just how good UCF is this weekend against South Carolina. I think it'll be respectable but the results should keep ucf quiet until their next game.

This is the game where we won't be able to look back and say well we really beat ourselves. This is the game where we are going to get absolutely dominated on both sides of the football and it'll sink in how unbelievably far we are from being a team to compete with good schools again.

He says all the right things, has catchy sayings, but the one thing he has failed to do to this point is actually coach. Lets hope that comes soon?

It is depressing. But, even with that UCF has beaten 1 ranked team in their entire history which was an overrated University of Houston team. They've had a football program since 1979. If they beat us in our worst season ever so be it. We continue to get better recruits even with what happened last year and what is happening this year. We have to fix this quickly though or UCF will pass us with recruits, and their program overall.