Jump to content

bjef4844

Member
  • Posts

    424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by bjef4844

  1. 9 hours ago, Triple B said:

    You and puc are more alike than I had realized (no offense, puc). Just endlessly typing crap, building those straw men, fighting those windmills.

    Your last two posts have nothing to do with the point I was making. It's got nothing to do with the expectations of a coach or a bar being set and everything to do with the way the real world actually works and how your solutions are fantasy based. CBG was not going to be fired this year based on performance and unless there are some serious extenuating circumstances, college football coaches are not fired after 2 years. Your seriously advocating those things was/is just plain ignorant and/or just attention wanting histrionics ........

    Firing a coach before he burns your program to the ground, when all of the signs are there isn't being "fantasy based", its about showing proactive leadership - coaches do get fired after 2 years in football and they do get fired after 4 years in basketball. The bottom line here is that USF is fine taking a measured approach to how they performance manage their leaders and will give them every opportunity to succeed or fail. Sometimes that patience pays off (CWT) and sometimes it doesn't (CCS). But as USF sinks further into intercollegiate irrelevance, they are going to have to figure out a plan that's different than everyone else, because they sure as hell can't execute on it better than their peers.

  2. 26 minutes ago, bcgruber said:

    ITs not looking like we were a program that was running a sinking ship like has been speculated

    If they were leaving to test free agency then I would agree, but most of the transfers are leaving due to racist comments by Herrion and Gregory's failure to hold him accountable in the eyes of the players. Throw in that this same coaching staff hasn't been able to field a competitive team in conference in 4 years, and I'm not sure what other horrific things you would need to happen to the program to consider it a sinking ship.

  3. 32 minutes ago, Triple B said:

     

    There's a huge difference between not being satisfied until it's achieved and throwing out solutions not based in reality ..... You excel in the latter.

    Yes, because asking a football coach to coach and recruit and not just cash paychecks while he waits for a better job is unrealistic, and asking a basketball coach to run a competent half court offense, not crap his pants late in games and not allow racist behaviors on his staff (allegedly) is unrealistic.

    Gotcha. If your bar for success was any lower Trip it'd be a rug. But at least we are cashing checks on the coattails of our conference mates! 

  4. 22 minutes ago, puc86 said:

    In all fairness to Bry there is no way anyone can paint anything that happened last season as incremental improvement, we regressed and you can’t be moving forward when you are going backwards

    Exactly, but I don't think I had unrealistic expectations for our 2 highest profile programs:

    Football - I had zero expectations in 2020 based on what Strong left Scott. My only complaint last season was play calling and time management in the Temple and Memphis games, but also realize these coaches are learning their jobs on the fly, and last year was a great year to make mistakes and hopefully learn from them. My 2021 expectation is 4-8 due to a pretty tough schedule and remaining uncertainty at the QB position

    Men's Basketball - My expectation for the 2020-21 season was an NCAAT appearance or deep run in the NIT, of which the team fell woefully short due to:

    • Gregory not being able to blend a less-than-100% Yetna, Murphy and Tchewa back into the returning group
    • The Covid pause occurring as the team was playing some of its better basketball
    • The defense taking a HUGE step backwards
    • Gregory continued poor X's and O's (half court offensive scheme, late game management)
    • Shuffling of players off and on the court, like Durr coming out when he is playing well and not in foul trouble (this was a common complaint of Gregory back at Dayton where he wouldn't let offensive players get into a rhythm because he fell in love with running "hockey lines")
    • Underlying player dissent

    My 2021-22 expectation would have been what I expect for any Year 5 coach - an NCAAT appearance, but with all the defections and Gregory still being at the helm a .500 conference record looks pretty good right now.

    Any success we have in any of our non-revenue generating sports is gravy. While I aspire for USF to achieve greater heights than that, I don't think any of that is unrealistic.

     

  5. 2 hours ago, Triple B said:

    You have a false sense of reality that has been exhibited several times on here ...... but it's not like that's unheard of round these parts.

    No, I just have a higher bar for success than whatever remains of our fanbase. I'm not asking our athletic department to do anything they haven't already done in the past. That's not a false sense of anything, that's just setting an expectation and not being satisfied until its achieved.

     

  6. 56 minutes ago, Triple B said:

    Which was a non reality based thought as was entertaining letting CWT and CCS go after only their second year ... Have to admit that when you find a niche, you embrace it, which is probably why puc figured out the $435K pretty quick.

    I just have a higher bar for success, and in Gregory's case 4 years is enough time to see what he can do.

  7. 21 minutes ago, puc86 said:

    He has said the number many times that was just the first one I was able to find and reference. I didn’t recall the number exactly I just knew if he was using a specific number that’s what it had to be for, most people would say $400k or $500k but if you want $435k it’s for a specific reason.

    Winner! Nearly every argument I have been given for not firing Gregory has been that we cannot afford then $435k buyout (20 weeks of his salary annualized), so this could be manna from heaven.

    In all seriousness, the window on firing Gregory this off season has likely closed - if performance was an issue Kelly likely would have been fired him within 24-48 hours of the Wichita State loss, but he is out there recruiting and will likely go unscathed despite the alleged tolerance for racism in the program.

    Other than slumming it in the portal, MBB is over for now so time to move on to other things USF related. It looks like that dead horse will still be there in the fall for me to come back and beat on.

  8. 36 minutes ago, chapelbull said:

    Surrender noted.  I look forward to seeing what was actually said once it is actually "out there"

    Not surrender, just tired of banging my head against a wall trying to explain a distinction without a difference. But I agree, I am looking forward to hearing the results of the investigation and how that matches up with what has been reportedly alleged.

  9. 47 minutes ago, Cubanbull said:

    If you expect USF basketball to be in top half of AAC you are setting yourself for disappointment. I want and expect better, but reality and history says that in the AAC

    Houston, Memphis, Wichita, Temple, SMU, Cincinnati and Tulsa have more history and more support than USF will ever have in basketball.

    We can compete with UCF, ECU, Tulane and when we are good we might be 4-5 in league.

     

    Feels like ages ago when we finished in a tie for 4th in the Big East back in 2011-12, with road wins at Villanova, Louisville, Pitt and Providence and with wins against 2 Top 25 teams.

    Not sure if that was the stars aligning for us during one season in the toughest college basketball conference of all-time, or if we should think we can compete at the top in a lesser conference.

  10. 6 minutes ago, Cubanbull said:

    So it looks so far that the three additions of Patrick, Hines and Moss are replacing Alec, Williams and Castaneda

    We still need a PF to replace Yetna if he is gone. If Dawson returns he is a replacement for Collins.

    I'd be curious to see if Gregory runs any twin towers out there with both Durr and Tchewa. may take some of the pressure off of finding a true starting PF.

  11. 14 minutes ago, Triple B said:

    The fact that that is your only rebuttal to that post means my work here is done and will now just sit back to wait and see how this latest episode of "Days of Our USFMBB" turns out ...

    That's the only rebuttal for a non-answer.

    At this point all we can do is exactly what you said, and sit back and wait. Gregory appears to be staying for Year 5 unless the investigation turns up something else or Kelly feels that whatever role Gregory played doesn't warrant dismissal. We'll just have to see how well he can recruit the portal this go around and put it all together. Maybe by not having Collins around anymore Gregory won't be hostage to his ball hogging late in games.

  12. 14 hours ago, chapelbull said:

    There is probably more players with "concerns", but it appears that they didn't make administration aware until post season exit interviews.  And the fact that Joe Public still doesn't know what the "concern" is and players are transferring in makes me wonder what it is all really about

    What has been specifically alleged is out there, as well as what were believed to be disingenuous apologies by the offending coach, with one of the apologies at the direction of Gregory so the player could get past it.

    The investigation will eventually determine what likely happened and will be interesting to see if a public records request will provide the details, if the athletic department doesn't publish it themselves.

    If what has been alleged is true then I can't see the offending coach being back, but with Gregory actively recruiting it appears as if he will won't be accountable for any of this.

     

  13. 1 hour ago, Triple B said:

    Only selective memory here about that is you. You pretty much ignored that second year or denigrated it, so you can just knock that ******** off. Nobody's buying it ...

     

    So was Heath .... CBG has had 7 20 win seasons, with 6 NIT/NCAA, 4/2, appearances so he's obviously had some success in spite of being a "terrible offensive coach." I hope he gets the chance to try and complete the build here because the program needs some sort of stability but have no idea if he gets that chance now. Just hoping you're as wrong about Gregory as you were about Taggart ...

    Nobody is talking about Heath...strawman argument.

  14. 40 minutes ago, Dave Glaser said:

    Recruiting some guys who can make a few open shots from the field and the line will make his offense look a lot better.

    Agreed, but I have to ask the question, if the only legitimate outside shooter we have had in 4 years is Justin Brown, what makes us think Gregory can recruit those kind of players? And more importantly, how will he be able to do it when there is a cloud of an investigation hanging over his head for allowing racist behavior to occur in his program (allegedly)?

    If we don't have Yetna to run this offense through next season, how will this team ever be successful enough next season to warrant Gregory returning for Year 6? The last I saw was Yetna was in the portal and according to @chapelbull this Gregory's offense can't function without him, and by function I mean finish around #230 in OER.

     

  15. 8 hours ago, Triple B said:

     I don't think anyone is saying right now that CBG totally is the answer but totally ignoring the facts about what was done his second year and the circumstances of these last two year is indeed disingenuous. 

    I will say it again, although there appears to be selective memory from a few of you, but what Gregory did in Year 2 after taking over for Antigua was nothing short of amazing. It far exceeded anyone's expectations, but my issues is that it never translated to anything. I understand the Yetna argument in Year 3, but even with Yetna, Gregory has always been a terrible offensive coach.

    Now he is tasked with replacing the roster with what appears to be low-to-mid major rejects, and is asked to bolt it all together and finally find a way to coach offense? I'm sorry, but I have seen enough poor offense and blown second half leads in the 124 games that this guy has coached at USF to know that we are just going to be right back here next year rebuilding with a new coaching staff.

    Now is the time to make a move, but it appears this is going to be Charlie Strong 2019 all over again.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.