I just want to know how anyone outside of our coaching staff can determine how well we "could" have done. Because to me, the only way one can measure how well we could have done is to look at the kids we missed out on THAT WE WERE IN CONTENTION FOR. Patrick Grant, Jock Sanders, Robert Marve, etc. On the other hand you need to look at the kids we got (esp. in need positions) that we weren't "supposed" to get...guys like Edenfield or Sutton. Given our history, or lack thereof, I dont think we can be compared head to head with places like Florida, USC, Ohio State, Michigan and therefore saying we could have done better based on what someone else did is illogical.