abull

1) Usf 2) 27-24 3) Mack 3) Davis 4) 400

I don't believe we rushed that good. It was only mack ability to break out, no scheme what so ever. I can blame the coaching staff for that since we are a running offense. To many QB throws ( with bad Qb) which even made it harder to move the chains or the clock.

Team Stat Comparison WCU USF 1st Downs 27 13 3rd down efficiency 9-19 4-13 4th down efficiency 2-2 0-2 Total Yards 454 485 Passing 374 191 Comp-Att 46-67 10-27 Yards per pass 5.6 7.1 Rushing 80 294 Rushing Attempts 29 33 Yards per rush 2.8 8.9 Penalties 5-45 6-38 Turnovers 2 2 Fumbles lost 1 1 Interceptions thrown 1 1 Possession 37:26 22:34 Espn stats http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=400547646 Looking at the states i can see we didn't control the ball or the time which led into a lot of scores against us. We had good total yards but we allowed way to much and it is not mainly from the defense it was because the offense didn't have the ball most of the time and run the football and move the clock. We need to do that against Maryland if we want to have a chance. We didn't convert alot of third down because most of the time we had third and long. And it was caused either by bad running calls or bad throws. our O-line looked better but they need to step it up, we played a FCS team and not a very good one. Hope coaches improve there calls and Qb does better, because the problem isn't of how talented we are it is how we are playing the game.

What i saw was a weak preparation fort the team against wc, I think the coaches focused more on the players and how to develop them than watching tape and create plays to stop there offense. About Mack i think that they need to create for him plays, they where not trusting him at the beginning of the game (not from a talent point but more from a experience point sense he is a true freshmen) they expected tice but i think he was injured. Next game we will see a developed defense like last years. ( A much developed one from the previous game). I don't know what to say about or Qb play Mike didn't show up maybe a couple of nice throws but way too many ugly one's. Sean price is not better than Macfarland and he deserve the starting job. Also our best receiver was injured and Sean wasn't that good maybe that affected the Qb play but still it was too awful to even consider such excuses. I hope we have a better defense but #DOSOMTHING with the QB position it is hurting us bad. I don't care get in flowers all i want to see is better QB play.

I was at the game, it was bad. I will take the W though. Student section seemed great, Good job mark harlan.

If you cant beat them, join them.

gold!!! Can't wait to be in ray jay. Just convinced about 15 of my friends to join.

after Houston's game i think a new stadium might jinks us. smh

I think that the problem with vandy wasn't there 3-4 defense it was more of the offense doing nothing and forcing the defense to get in every minute. 6 turnovers, just too much for a defense to handle. Although the south carolina game worries me regarding the 3-4, but we will not be facing a very good offense until we face Wisconsin, and the 3-4 will actually be better with a running offense.

I'am just not getting this bs how are you allowed and there permission came from the sec when it is a Fu**ing ncaa rule not a SEC one. Mind Blown!!!!!!

wtf happened. guess it is SEC over rules??????

they just called it Vanderbilt got penalized.

Temple is crushing Vanderbilt. go aac

1) The winning team: Usf 2) The final score: 35-13 3) Bulls leading rusher: tice 4) Bulls leading receiver Andre Davis 5) Bulls total offensive yards: 460

Go bulls. I will probably be there.

Can't wait for the season to start. But I still don't know which 4 games should I choose and where is the better sections to be in, in the stadium. UCiF is a must watch game.

I think that this idea will be great but after a winning season. If we managed to do that I believe that most student will be willing to exchange. Burning it will be a lot fun, it will also have a stronger impact on student. (looking at it from a psychological way)

Thank you,