Jump to content
  • Members do not see this ad, Register

  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

football clearly drives expansion


    Recommended Posts


    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  9,790
    • Content Count:  65,007
    • Reputation:   2,134
    • Days Won:  172
    • Joined:  01/01/2001

    that big ten chose Rutgers over UConn proves it

     

    usf has a chance one day if coach t can right the  ship

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  64
    • Content Count:  4,661
    • Reputation:   396
    • Days Won:  21
    • Joined:  09/24/2012

    No, markets do.

     

    Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers.

     

    They were sadly mistaken.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  653
    • Content Count:  31,049
    • Reputation:   2,487
    • Days Won:  172
    • Joined:  08/30/2011

    No, markets do.

     

    Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers.

     

    They were sadly mistaken.

     

     

    LOL

     

    They would have gotten FAR more of the NY market by taking ND

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  1,680
    • Content Count:  16,196
    • Reputation:   793
    • Days Won:  12
    • Joined:  08/16/2004

     

    No, markets do.

     

    Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers.

     

    They were sadly mistaken.

     

     

    LOL

     

    They would have gotten FAR more of the NY market by taking ND

     

    they tried

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    • Group:  Moderator
    • Topic Count:  1,559
    • Content Count:  70,184
    • Reputation:   8,825
    • Days Won:  391
    • Joined:  11/25/2005

    that big ten chose Rutgers over UConn proves it

     

     

    :facepalm:  ... If there's any more proof needed that football doesn't drive expansion, I'm not sure what it would be.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  246
    • Content Count:  6,348
    • Reputation:   662
    • Days Won:  8
    • Joined:  05/25/2006

    that big ten chose Rutgers over UConn proves it

    usf has a chance one day if coach t can right the ship

    CT won more football BE championships than Rutgers. On the field, across several sports, UCONN is by far the better athletic school.

    Further proof that it is more about off the field factors than on-field success.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  146
    • Content Count:  19,346
    • Reputation:   6,067
    • Days Won:  233
    • Joined:  01/13/2011

     

    that big ten chose Rutgers over UConn proves it

    usf has a chance one day if coach t can right the ship

    CT won more football BE championships than Rutgers. On the field, across several sports, UCONN is by far the better athletic school.

    Further proof that it is more about off the field factors than on-field success.

     

    Proof? Please elaborate on this proof thing you guys keeping using in your arguments on this site. I don't get it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  303
    • Content Count:  5,540
    • Reputation:   864
    • Days Won:  21
    • Joined:  11/07/2009

    lol @ Spazza

     

    Starts another thread on something he knows nothing about.

    With obvious facts easily available that completely counter his point.

    Edited by dogma
    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  2,227
    • Content Count:  20,633
    • Reputation:   792
    • Days Won:  10
    • Joined:  01/02/2007

    No, markets do.

     

    Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers.

     

    They were sadly mistaken.

    Boom, that was a smack down with the obvious 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    • Group:  Member
    • Topic Count:  653
    • Content Count:  31,049
    • Reputation:   2,487
    • Days Won:  172
    • Joined:  08/30/2011

     

     

    No, markets do.

     

    Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers.

     

    They were sadly mistaken.

     

     

    LOL

     

    They would have gotten FAR more of the NY market by taking ND

     

    they tried

     

     

    Not very hard. They were too arrogant to offer them the same deal the ACC did.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Members do not see this ad, Register

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now


    ×
    ×
    • Create New...