smazza Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,790 Content Count: 65,007 Reputation: 2,134 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted April 8, 2014 that big ten chose Rutgers over UConn proves it usf has a chance one day if coach t can right the ship 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hem Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 64 Content Count: 4,661 Reputation: 396 Days Won: 21 Joined: 09/24/2012 Share Posted April 8, 2014 No, markets do. Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers. They were sadly mistaken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted April 8, 2014 No, markets do. Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers. They were sadly mistaken. LOL They would have gotten FAR more of the NY market by taking ND Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flsportsfan83 Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,680 Content Count: 16,196 Reputation: 793 Days Won: 12 Joined: 08/16/2004 Share Posted April 8, 2014 No, markets do. Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers. They were sadly mistaken. LOL They would have gotten FAR more of the NY market by taking ND they tried Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triple B Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Moderator Topic Count: 1,559 Content Count: 70,184 Reputation: 8,825 Days Won: 391 Joined: 11/25/2005 Share Posted April 8, 2014 that big ten chose Rutgers over UConn proves it ... If there's any more proof needed that football doesn't drive expansion, I'm not sure what it would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usfgrad84 Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 246 Content Count: 6,348 Reputation: 662 Days Won: 8 Joined: 05/25/2006 Share Posted April 8, 2014 that big ten chose Rutgers over UConn proves it usf has a chance one day if coach t can right the ship CT won more football BE championships than Rutgers. On the field, across several sports, UCONN is by far the better athletic school. Further proof that it is more about off the field factors than on-field success. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 146 Content Count: 19,346 Reputation: 6,067 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted April 8, 2014 that big ten chose Rutgers over UConn proves it usf has a chance one day if coach t can right the ship CT won more football BE championships than Rutgers. On the field, across several sports, UCONN is by far the better athletic school. Further proof that it is more about off the field factors than on-field success. Proof? Please elaborate on this proof thing you guys keeping using in your arguments on this site. I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogma Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 303 Content Count: 5,540 Reputation: 864 Days Won: 21 Joined: 11/07/2009 Share Posted April 8, 2014 (edited) lol @ Spazza Starts another thread on something he knows nothing about. With obvious facts easily available that completely counter his point. Edited April 8, 2014 by dogma 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rizman Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 2,227 Content Count: 20,633 Reputation: 792 Days Won: 10 Joined: 01/02/2007 Share Posted April 8, 2014 No, markets do. Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers. They were sadly mistaken. Boom, that was a smack down with the obvious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charsibb Posted April 8, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 653 Content Count: 31,049 Reputation: 2,487 Days Won: 172 Joined: 08/30/2011 Share Posted April 8, 2014 No, markets do. Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers. They were sadly mistaken. LOL They would have gotten FAR more of the NY market by taking ND they tried Not very hard. They were too arrogant to offer them the same deal the ACC did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now