hm101 Posted April 9, 2014 Group: TBP Subscriber Topic Count: 173 Content Count: 6,932 Reputation: 2,218 Days Won: 12 Joined: 06/11/2010 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Smazza is right. We will have another shot and football has a disproportionate impact. For now, improve academics and win the conference we are in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted April 9, 2014 (edited) The Big 12 took on TCU after their stellar football season. Football drives markets; the markets drives expansion. Maybe both are indirectly true. Either way, USF needs to win at both basketball and football to be considered. Not fair, but when you are a young Univ., that is what happens.It's not about football, basketball, or markets. At least not directly. It's about merchandise, ticket, and advertising sales. These are the Benjamins behind it all. We don't sell enough ads, tickets, or jerseys, nor does it appear that we will in the foreseeable future, to justify an invite to the adults table.I think USF would do a lot better if the school and fans didn't worry moving into P5 and just concentrate on the task/opponents at hand. Let's see success at THIS level for awhile instead of all the hand wringing over moving to P5.This is excellent advice Slick. I have been echoing it over and over. How can one enjoy anything USF athletics if you are always worrying about conference realignment. Personally, I stopped caring long ago...for me it is all about the game at hand.You say that until UCF, Cincy, or UCONN get their invite out; and We are stuck with new CUSA schools. True but you know what? There is not a **** thing you, I, or anyone can do about it, so you might as well enjoy the **** game. Edited April 9, 2014 by NewEnglandBull 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted April 9, 2014 The Big 12 took on TCU after their stellar football season. Football drives markets; the markets drives expansion. Maybe both are indirectly true. Either way, USF needs to win at both basketball and football to be considered. Not fair, but when you are a young Univ., that is what happens. It's not about football, basketball, or markets. At least not directly. It's about merchandise, ticket, and advertising sales. These are the Benjamins behind it all. We don't sell enough ads, tickets, or jerseys, nor does it appear that we will in the foreseeable future, to justify an invite to the adults table. I think USF would do a lot better if the school and fans didn't worry moving into P5 and just concentrate on the task/opponents at hand. Let's see success at THIS level for awhile instead of all the hand wringing over moving to P5. This is excellent advice Slick. I have been echoing it over and over. How can one enjoy anything USF athletics if you are always worrying about conference realignment. Personally, I stopped caring long ago...for me it is all about the game at hand. The performance on the field has prevented most from enjoying anything about USF athletics. True but it is the cycle of sports, we will be get better. Regardless, most on this board at least keep watching. Hell, I am 1200 miles away and I am watching a two win team play some school I used to call Memphis State. I am still going to watch no mater the circumstance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usfgrad84 Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 246 Content Count: 6,348 Reputation: 662 Days Won: 8 Joined: 05/25/2006 Share Posted April 9, 2014 The Big 12 took on TCU after their stellar football season. Football drives markets; the markets drives expansion. Maybe both are indirectly true. Either way, USF needs to win at both basketball and football to be considered. Not fair, but when you are a young Univ., that is what happens. It's not about football, basketball, or markets. At least not directly. It's about merchandise, ticket, and advertising sales. These are the Benjamins behind it all. We don't sell enough ads, tickets, or jerseys, nor does it appear that we will in the foreseeable future, to justify an invite to the adults table. I think USF would do a lot better if the school and fans didn't worry moving into P5 and just concentrate on the task/opponents at hand. Let's see success at THIS level for awhile instead of all the hand wringing over moving to P5. Agree. The things the school can do, they are already doing. That is continuing to improve the academic standing and improving the facilities. The other thing they need to do is to build attendance. That is where winning will come into play. Hopefully, Taggart gets this thing moving forward and in an interesting way. Same for Antigua. Harlan is supposed to be a marketing guy. If USF is an exciting, interesting, fun brand that can attract fans to the stadium and, more importantly, to the tv set, then the invites will come. The whole thing is about money, not just winning. If no one wants to watch, the conference doesn't make money, no matter how much you win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,895 Content Count: 66,073 Reputation: 2,431 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 (edited) No, markets do. Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers. They were sadly mistaken. there is no college market in ny but uconn has less of a tv market for sure no one willever be able to explain to me that taking rutgers made any sense for the big 10 Edited April 9, 2014 by smazza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usfvictor Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 761 Reputation: 45 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/09/2011 Share Posted April 9, 2014 No, markets do. Rutgers football has sucked for decades, as has their bball. The B1G believed they were getting the NYC market by taking Rutgers. They were sadly mistaken. there is no college market in ny but uconn has less of a tv market for sure no one willever be able to explain to me that taking rutgers made any sense for the big 10 the reason they did it is extra money they'll get from TV partners. Looks like i just explained it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullFan98 Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 258 Content Count: 7,780 Reputation: 328 Days Won: 7 Joined: 08/13/2010 Share Posted April 9, 2014 We need to focus on winning the elusive conference championship. If we can accomplish this and continue to dominate our conference, then we will be part of the expansion conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 56 Content Count: 4,422 Reputation: 708 Days Won: 19 Joined: 03/16/2013 Share Posted April 9, 2014 The last two seasons (in both major sports) resulted in a worst case scenario. We know that we can not accept mediocrity. The AAC will fall into irrelevance, as the P5 recruit top performers. (UCONN, Cincy, or UCF). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usfgrad84 Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 246 Content Count: 6,348 Reputation: 662 Days Won: 8 Joined: 05/25/2006 Share Posted April 9, 2014 I don't understand where you keep coming up with this whole "winning means the P5 will recruit Cincy, UCONN and UCF". Since we joined the BE, Cincy won 4 conference championships and UCONN won 2. Same as UL, more than Pitt and Rutgers. Cincy was the same as WVU. It is so much more than just winning. Just saying if you win you will get an invite is very simplistic. Pure and simple, the only thing driving expansion is cold hard cash. Yes, the teams the have been part of expansion have had winning teams, at times, but the more important thing they brought to the table is an exciting, recognizable brand that more importantly brings a conference a gateway to the ATM machine (tv sets). Louisville has been one of the media darlings of college football on and off for about a decade now. Their timing in getting rid of Kragthorpe was perfect and came at the time the Bridgewater put together the notable, PR worthy career. Fans wanted to watch Louisville play. Their brand remained relevant year round because they also have a Hall of Fame BB coach that is consistently one of the top teams in the country. Rutgers was chosen because of their market. With their AAU designation and their geographical footprint they just happen to fit the profile of what the B1G was looking for in their expansion vision and potential for the Big Ten network. Trust me, they were not chosen because they beat up on USF yearly. They bring a huge potential audience for both the NYC metro market and the Philly market. If Bortles and Johnson would have stayed on board and kept UCF in the public on for another year they may have been in the situation as UL. Now, even if they do well this year (which I don't expect) they are back to be confused with USF unless someone their emerges as a huge media presence and they stay on the natonal stage for another couple of years. It is about becoming a national brand that is desireable to viewer giving them a reason to watch so the conferences can make money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dhambuc Posted April 9, 2014 Group: Member Topic Count: 165 Content Count: 2,233 Reputation: 224 Days Won: 6 Joined: 08/18/2011 Share Posted April 9, 2014 (edited) The Mouse( the Evil Empire of ESPN ) is what is driving this train. Follow the money people. Its about Eyeballs (TV Markets) ect...... Winning will create more eyeballs and exposure, However winning is not the Sole path to the Power 5. (See Cuse, Pitt, Rutgers, Colorado, ect) over the recent years. A lot of it based on Market share. As for the Big 10 AAU is "part of who they are" but we see that got thrown out the window when Nebraska came on board. http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/26078/nebraska-loses-aau-status Edited April 9, 2014 by Dhambuc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now