Jump to content

StevieRayBull

Member
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

StevieRayBull's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

7

Reputation

  1. Bad day for USF's former head coach. https://www.si.com/college/2021/11/26/skip-holtz-fired-louisiana-tech-football-coaching-search
  2. Needing improvement isn't the same as having nothing. When Taggart took over, the cupboard was bare. This is not that situation. We have some good skill position players returning (Joiner, Evans, Ford) and some good players on defense (Hampton, Sails, Boyles, Yates). We need to get more talent, especially on the o-line, but it's absurd to pretend next year's team has no talent.
  3. Conference affiliation is not unimportant, but I think it's clouding everyone's thoughts too much nowadays. This article was fair in it's discussion of conference affiliation, but our interest as fans in the program shouldn't be dominated by this. USF just needs to be worried about winning the games it plays and the rest will take care of itself. Better conference affiliation could help us with recruiting, but it's not the end all. If we were moving up from 1-AA, I'd be more worried about our recruiting position, but our place in the state right now is good enough to attract whatever recruits we'll need. All this conference affiliation talk is mostly high school-type drama and politics. I'd rather be the guy who goes about his business and isn't worried about being "popular" with the other conferences. In the end, he'll be a great success. I think Boise State has been the best example of this in recent history. Granted, they're playing the conference game too, but if I were a Boise fan, I'd be happy with the coaching and program rising based on success on the field. Again, I understand that conference affiliation isn't irrelevant, but I'm not going to sweat over what we can't control or make too big a deal of it. What we can control is winning the games on our schedule, and I think we have the coach to do that.
  4. This guy shows the power of Taggart as a recruiter. What was more impressive before he committed to USF was his commitment to WKU when he had a bunch of BCS and SEC offers.
  5. Many people on this thread have been specifically talking about size, and associating it with the ability to run a pro-style offense. That's why I posted. Obviously we want the best lineman no matter which offense we run. Running a spread or a pro-style will not keep us from getting the best players. Winning or losing matters to recruits more than the style.
  6. This idea that we have to have giant offensive lineman to run a pro-style offense is being exaggerated: http://www.sportsnola.com/sports/sports-blogs/rene-nadeau/585378-size-matters-sometimes-a-look-at-college-footballs-offensive-lines.html The average difference between a BE line and and SEC line was only 7 lbs, and the reason they're bigger is mostly because they train to be. The offense dictates lineman size more than lineman size dictates offense. We can run a pro-style offense with no problem, just some adjustments. WKU had the 23rd heaviest line in all college football heading into this year. WKU! If they can recruit and train big linemen at Western Kentucky, we can do it at USF. I'd like to see us run a pro-style offense and I think we can do it.
  7. My vote goes to Taggart. He's got the Harbaugh coaching mentality, which means he'll make our defense stop being soft. Whoever the next coach is needs to make us more physical and bring back a good defense to USF. FYI about Nutt's alleged affair: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2841224 It was all rumors based on texts between numbers, not based on any actual messages.
  8. Former USF pitcher Kevin Quackenbush got a nod in today's SI article about prospects from the Arizona Fall League. Way to represent Kevin! http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/tom_verducci/11/20/arizona-fall-league-top-prospects/index.html?eref=sihp&sct=hp_t12_a0
  9. You're right. This thread should be titled "Holtz' lack of reaction to penalties"
  10. In the FSU game, Lattimore made a stupid personal foul penalty on a third down play came up short and would have resulted in a punt. When the camera showed him next to Holtz on the sideline, Holtz was listening to him justify his penalty. Against Temple, Marcus Shaw had a personal foul call that cost our defense major field position on a punt. When he came to the sidelines he was smiling and the players were high-fiving him. Then they showed him talking next to a calm and consoling Holtz. I've never seen Holtz hold a player accountable. He always just listens and gives pats on the back. I've never seen him get on Daniels after he makes dumb interceptions. Holtz always thinks his team is giving a great effort, but he doesn't demand anything from them. He doesn't push them to be any better than they already are. We have a talented and experienced team, but the player's are only living up to their personal standards, when they need a coach to show them how to raise the bar. That's my two cents.
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.