Jump to content

Economics_Nerd82

Member
  • Posts

    5,903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Economics_Nerd82

  1. Can't imagine anything earth shattering will come from the meeting.

     

    Pesonally, I have no problem adding any of the following:

    ARKANSAS ST.

    UTAH ST.

    NORTHERN ILLINOIS

    BALL ST.

    SAN JOSE ST.

    KENT ST.

    TULSA

     

    They're not great in name. But their performance over the past couple of years has been good (albeit in weaker conferences). TV market wise... meh.

     

    -----

     

    Do you think they could come out with a new revenue sharing plan to attract [or maintain] teams? I'm not talking about the really sweet deal that Boise/MWC did, but maybe something that would sweeten the pot?

  2. sorry but south tampa people that are influential don't send their kids to plant.

    That is pure unadulterated BS. There are people that live in flippin' Avila that send their kids to Plant. You know a lot of stuff, this is not one of them. I'm often in South Tampa, and 99.9% of the collegiate plates are UF or FSU. Plant's parking lot is filled with cars that I may never be able to afford.

  3. There is an article in the WSJ this morning about the value, in millions, of major-conference college-football programs.

    USF was ranked at number 53 with a value of $101.2. I was shocked to see that we beat out some other football programs with a lot more history and success. As a comparison, UCF is ranked number 65 with a value of $57.0

    Perhaps the Gods to be at the ACC or B12 will read this and see how valuable we are :)

    I think we beat out everyone else that is currently in the BE, Connecticut was ranked 52 with a value of 101.8.

    http://online.wsj.co...abs=interactive

    Interesting find.

    The chart in the link you provided has us at 53 and UConn at 52. Was there another link somewhere in the article. I don't UCF ranked at all on the chart. It looks like Pittsburgh is number 65, not UCF. According to the article, these rankings are for the 2011-12 season. With that in mind, it wouldn't have taken into account our 3-9 record this year and conference mess, so we probably dropped.

    ---------

     

     

    The chart just shows a ranking of selectively chosen universities.  Not all of them in order.

     

    Try this one for the interactive chart.

     

    The interactive chart you are linked to if for 2011 evaluations. The one in the first link is for 2012. The value represents what the price of the program would be to a buyer.

    ---------------------------------------------------------

     

    Imagine if the top 14 schools formed their own [big Money] conference:

     

    Big Ten/12/Independent Division

    Michigan

    Nebraska

    Penn State

    Ohio State

    Notre Dame

    Oklahoma

    Texas

     

    SEC Division

    Tennessee

    Florida

    Arkansas

    Georgia

    Alabama

    LSU

    Auburn

  4. OUCH!

    http://voices.idahos...ise_wasn’t_wort

    “What Boise State wanted was outrageous and unprecedented. It was not palatable to any of the other Big East institutions,†Gladchuk said. “In the final analysis, Boise wasn’t worth it. There is zero television interest in Boise along the Eastern seaboard. What it tells me is the Mountain West was desperate. Clearly, the Mountain West was willing to make whatever concessions necessary to keep Boise in the fold.â€

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.