Jump to content

Bull Nut

Member
  • Posts

    1,327
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Bull Nut

  1. It would result in a message that consistent underperformance will not be tolerated. Any change in leadership of a program that won 3 games in as many years would be a move in the right direction. You can't argue otherwise.
  2. I'm not calling for CAG to be fired, but if MK were to be fired and subsequently CAG, would we be worse off? We need immediate results, enough is enough.
  3. And my apologies, I've been referencing Larry Scott when I meant Willie Simmons.
  4. They were both available in the coaching pool at the time. Unfortunately, MK doesn't have the time to groom another first time head coach. Again, this is all speculation and assumption, but if we lose to either of those teams I will be heated.
  5. The only reason I feel it is a factor in his employment is because MK passed up on both Larry Scott and Tom Herman. There are positives to Michael Kelly but, hiring for the sports that matter isn't one of them, until we're proven wrong. If MK can't hire someone to go .500 in our soft schedule, then that's on him.
  6. Obviously I disagree, but hope I'm wrong
  7. I respectfully disagree. There's only one constant within the equation of our epic slump.
  8. Fair enough, but if we lose to FAMU/FAU why carry out the rest of the season? If we all know what's going to happen, part ways immediately.
  9. Not blaming CAG whatsoever. He is a victim of circumstances.
  10. I'm trying not to derail the thread, however, I know you're a well-respected voice and value your opinion. If we lose to FAMU or FAU, do you think MK should retain his position?
  11. I use an IPTV service provider. Pretty cheap, but not exactly street legal.
  12. Agreed. We also had a shot to hire Scott and Herman. If we lose to either of them, then MK hired the wrong guy (again) and should be fired immediately.
  13. Might not be a gimme on our schedule.... If we lose to FAMU or FAU then MK needs to be fired immediately.
  14. You're an absolute moron if you think this is on the head coach.
  15. Not getting my hopes up, but these guys look the part. The past few cycles have looked like kids. Looks like these dudes have been doing the right things over the summer.
  16. They must be extremely well respected journalists... So much so that they are the only ones in the entire country where their questions aren't heard during press conferences. I can see why they want their questions shrouded in secrecy given the millions of views... Let's call it how it is, amateur hour!
  17. What's the address I should send a microphone that can be used for the media questions?
  18. Not saying a backfilled PAC would be a great conference, but there is value to the brand. Yes, the PAC went through a period of mismanagement and poor leadership. Does it deserve to die? I don't think so... It's hard to argue over 100 years of history. Brands can be revitalized... Look at Apple.
  19. There are already a handful of disgruntled members in the ACC. Unless Stanford agrees to pay FSU, Clemson, UNC, and Miami big/sec money then I don't see it. I could see a few of them saying **** those liberals out in Cali just to prove a point. We shall see...
  20. I don't see how Stanford gets the votes needed from the existing ACC members.
  21. I just completed this quiz. My Score 6/100 My Time 137 seconds  
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.