Jump to content

BrassBulls12

Member
  • Posts

    4,679
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by BrassBulls12

  1. 1 minute ago, brybull1970 said:

    Its proposed as down-the-road alternative to shuttering the program or living in classification of football that has no path to a national championship or would drive any interest/revenue.

    That's one way to look at it. I see it as a down the road alternative to picking up your ball and going home, in which we just pick up our ball and go play with the middle schools kids hoping we can beat them. The fact is there is a path, we just aren't good enough to walk it. 

  2. I have yet to see where the rule clearly states that a judge has to be struck in order for it to deemed reckless and dangerous. The article I posted provide two examples of tennis pros striking a ball in frustration and striking someone of the court but because it wasn't a judge, nothing happened or they were not disqualified.  

    Meanwhile, only two weeks ago at the Southern & Western Open - which Djokovic won - Aljaz Bedene accidentally struck a cameraman after hitting the ball away in frustration

     

    Bedene immediately apologised but the tournament official was called out to judge whether he should have been defaulted.

    Fortunately for Bedene, he wasn't - receiving just a code violation instead.

     

     

  3. The rule is not clear, proven by the Federer situation, why was he not ejected. If there answer he hit a ball boy not a judge then clearly the intent of the rule is not safety if it is, it seems kinds backward to protect the adults so vehemently and let  whatever happen to the kids but....

  4. 1 hour ago, Triple B said:

    He wasn't the guy to start play. He had just lost serve ...... and he's looking dead at the linesman when he hit the ball at her where he didn't even glance at the ball boy when he hit right to him. It was a **** move that I don't think he meant to hit where it did but it wasn't an accident and negligent disregard was putting it nicely .... and the Federer incident has no bearing on this.

    I don't see how you think this was intentional in anyway. Also how is the federer thing different? That kids job is to get a ball that hits the net, Feds ball didn't hit the net and he recklessly and dangerously hit a trick shot into the kids chest. 

  5. 33 minutes ago, chapelbull said:

    That wasn't soft and she was paying attention.  She was standing at attention, looking down the line as she is supposed to be.   He screwed up and per the rule was defaulted.

    its just me but, imma keep my eye on the ball until the play is about to begin. She had no reason to be watching the line, how about keeping an eye on the guy thats starts play? You don't have to agree, but that's soft rule made to protect high horse judges. Proven by the fact that when happens to a ball boy, nothing happens....zilch, they laugh about it and tell him he's gotta be ready..... what a novel Idea

     

    And again my biggest contention point isn't right or wrong, its the severity of the punishment. Take a point, ok take a game, seems severe, ejection? negative. 

  6. 31 minutes ago, chapelbull said:

    Yeah, that is more than just flipping the ball towards a basketball ref and the sport of tennis like golf is supposed to carry some level of decorum.  It's probably the kid of thing that gets a warning if he hits the back wall, but since it hit the line judge in the throat he ends up defaulting.

    Here is the rule from an article:

    "In accordance with the Grand Slam rulebook, following his actions of hitting a ball dangerously or recklessly within the court or hitting a ball with negligent disregard of the consequences, the U.S. Open tournament referee defaulted Novak Djokovic from the 2020 U.S. Open. 

    novak-djokovic-us-open.jpg

    Djokovic, the No. 1 seed in the tournament, was trailing Pablo Carreño Busta, 6-5, in...

     

    My example was more about demeanor not intensity of strike. 

    That's soft. Hitting a fan ok, but if your on that court pay attention. 

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.