Jump to content

IBulleve

Member
  • Posts

    1,215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by IBulleve

  1. There’s no shortage of opportunities to poke holes in the net system (no pun intended). 
     

    I genuinely don’t understand how we are below some of these teams. Look at St. Bonaventure for an example.

    Q1: 0-4 (USF 1-0) 

    Q2: 2-2 (USF 5-3) 

    Q3: 8-2 (USF 8-0) 

    Q4: 8-2 (USF 9-2) 

    How do you operate an entire sport on a made up “NET” system, and the the meat and potatoes of it contradict itself in the rankings? 

    How in the year 2024 have we somehow made a WORSE BCS system? 

     

  2. 11 minutes ago, Bull94 said:

    it's the way all successful sports organizations are run now. they all have analytics departments. even nfl teams.

    nobody goes by their gut instincts anymore.

    I’m very aware. Pounding the table that analytics are important, useful, and even critical to a functioning sports organization today isn’t the conversation we’re having. We’re discussing whether or not to blindly use %’s in game theory. 

    I’m very pro-analytics, especially when it comes to roster construction in baseball.

    But game theory isn’t a perfect science, especially not at the lower collegiate level where there’s more variables than the pro game. 

    Example - a lot of these generic game theory models would tell you to go for it on 4th and 1 whether you’re facing Navy or the New England Patriots. Surely we can agree there’s matchups and factors that need to be considered in these potential different circumstances, correct?

    Thus, why you don’t blindly trust the numbers

    note: I say “lower” in terms of a relatively bad football team that doesn’t execute at the level of a professional team.  

     

  3. Just now, Bull94 said:

    if you don't follow them "blindly" then you are just using your gut.

    the rays follow analytics "blindly". seems to be working out ok for them.

    Using a baseball teams approach to justify your opinion on football game theory is a wild take lol. 

     

  4. 15 hours ago, Rocky Style said:

    No, I don't believe they are sacred or just because a prediction model says you should do it that you should.  

    I just think the reasoning to "be aggressive" is not enough. That argument was silly to me.

    This is the correct take. Blindly following the analytics is just as bad as blindly opposing them. They’re a tool that should be used accordingly 

  5. 2 minutes ago, puc86 said:

    If you have money for everything then by all means build away but if you have to be judicious in your spending facilities are now way less important than people here feel they need to pretend that they are. 
     

    “It’s totally changed recruiting,” Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin says of NIL and collectives. “I joke all the time about it: Go ahead and build facilities and these great weight rooms and training rooms, but you ain’t gonna have any good players in them if you don’t have NIL money.”

    Think the argument would be building an OCS is fundamental in rebuilding/engaging the fanbase/community which is where the NIL funds will locally come from 

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.