No, I didn't know that LSU had a top10 scoring offense. :-[ I only followed three of their games; the 49 they put on UK, the 3 they dropped on Auburn, and the 28 they scored on UT. In the AU and UT games, they looked pa-thet-ic. I just naturally figured that they scored 49 on UK because, well, they were playing UK. That UT/LSU game was one of the worst games I've seen this year. Neither team looked good at all. Both teams tried to give the game away, but neither seemed competent to even do that right. lol The way you're nit-picking the BigEast teams could be done to any team in the country. And that's my point, I guess. Most people have their own criteria for when, exactly, they will become "sold" on the BigEast. The only way to overcome that, is to win head-to-head matchups. But even then, excuses abound. All I'm saying is that, objectively, the league stands on very firm footing. I think any "elite" team from any conference could compete for the BigEast title, just like any "elite" team from the BigEast could compete for any other conference title. The SEC does have more overall good teams, they also have more overall bad teams.