You started off okay, but individual cases where a psyched up underclassmen was inserted and showed some great energy making some plays doesn't support your cause that strongly. If nothing else it even goes back to coaching where Holtz wasn't able to bring out the strengths of upperclassmen (motivation) who had shown great potential and been given accolades as underclassmen. From their recruitment through their underclassmen years no one was questioning the talent of most of these individuals. If you were referring to our CB situation, that was a known talent issue. Are we talking about lack of actual talent/potential, or just how it was used? If it is how it was used, that again goes back to coaching and the ability to motivate/inspire someone to use their talent/potential.
The rest of the response was pretty general and went back into beliefs. I'm having a tough time with this because it goes against common rationale that lead to the firing of Holtz. BTW, I also do not believe Grothe got incredible coaching while he was here.
Agree. Plus, like I said, these players were recruited to play in a wide open, spread offense, scramble, get into the open field and use their speed & athleticism to make people miss. Skippy always reigned them in, trying to make everyone (including BJ) play inside the tackles, short drop back passing, etc. on defense, they were used to being aggressive, where Skippy made them play soft. Skippy was the opposite of a great coach who adapts his system for his players, but rather tried to adapt his players to his system. He started out with Leavitt's team and went 8-5, lost some of Leavitt's players and went 5-7, lost some more of Leavitt's players and went 3-9.... nuff said!