Yes to the first statement, no to the second.http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/schools/finances/?fullsite=true
Huh? your own data says otherwise. I added the profit column. It's equal to revenue - expenses + subsidy
RANK SCHOOL TOTAL REVENUE TOTAL EXPENSES TOTAL SUBSIDY % SUBSIDY profit
18 Louisville $96,193,330 $92,383,221 $10,914,122 11.35 $14,724,231
24 Florida State $91,382,441 $84,772,759 $7,859,734 8.6 $14,469,416
The statement was that Louisville was already more profitable. Louisville is what, $250,000 ahead and takes in $3,000,000 more from the students?
Louisville athletics are doing a fantastic job. They earned every bit of their entrance into the ACC. They can hold their own with anyone in the conference on the basketball court and their football team is in the upper tier. Their other athletics are solid across the board with their baseball team making huge strides recently. They are not more profitable than FSU already.
Considering FSU takes in $15+ million more in TV revenue, UL will be ahead of them very soon
They very well could. But that wasn't the statement.