The whole thing is silly anyway, because attendance, paid or actual, is no indicator of a school's ability to field a I-A football team. There are solvent I-A programs with small attendance figures (like Southern Miss) and schools that will never run afoul of attendance requirements, but drown in a sea of red ink anyway (Arizona comes to mind). A better yardstick would be a minimum-scholarship requirement. I-A schools are allowed a maximum of 85; I-AA schools get 60. There are many I-A schools that operate at a I-AA scholarship level, or close to it. These are the ones who should be forced to move down. In fact, this is precisely why sub-divisions within Division I football were created: so schools would compete against other schools with similar resources. Too bad they're not being used. If I were in charge, I'd require I-A schools to fund a minimum of 75 scholarships, and to play a certain number of OOC home games. There might even be demand for a new level between the current I-A and I-AA, for schools who wish to fund more than 60 but fewer than 75. But I'm rambling a bit.