My reason for not choosing the others
1. Michigan scandal, they don’t deserve to be there
2. Texas beat Alabama but had the worse loss out of the 1 loss contender
3. Alabama struggled against us and lucked out against Auburn
In reality the CFP should be.
1. Washington
2. FSU
3. tOSU
4. UGA
You could even swap UGA and tOSU.
I could easily see the committee pushing that one team above the 2 G5 champs.
Also, how many ACC teams woefully get in this year in a 12 team playoff. Obviously FSU.
Happens all the time though. I liked being able to view Twitter for free just for sports purposes, other than that I never went there. Created an account for it when it first started, and didn’t understand the appeal, same with Instagram.
New idea.
2 Power conferences of 64 teams each, broken into 8 divisions of 8 teams.
Round robins scheduling to play all teams in for division (7 games total) and one protected rivalry outside division. (8 games total). Tie breakers can be total point differential or penalty yards.
Playoff bid for each division champ (11 games total). Then the winner of that plays for national championship against the other conference champ.
You can keep almost the entirety of college football intact and omit any bias of p5/g5. Also, cap coaches salaries for god’s sake.
Honestly, (this scenario benefits the ACC, and only the ACC) ACC needs to stick together and take the PAC-2, TTech, TCU, Ok State, Kansas and then they would be the 3rd best for sure.
Are they really though? I feel like this news and the design team change are kind of conflicting. Maybe I don’t know design, like maybe one team starts it and the other time fine tunes later?
It appears you are using ad blocking tools. This site is supported through ads. Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen. Registration is free and reduces ads.