Aesthetics are pretty far from a strong suit at USF. Really don't know why they ever went the route of the pre-fab's that we see in the new dorms and most of the athletic expansion. The "architecture" (and I use that word pretty loosly) that we have used in recent construction has the attraction level of play-ground equipment. While it's obviously too late to really validate any sort of complaining, I wish the longterm planners could have taken in design uniformity and a degree of "professional" creativity into consideration when they went on their expansion benders.
I mean really.. who looks at the final designs for a lot of these buildings (cough Corbett, Baseball/Softball, Juniper/Poplar, Maple Apts, Morsani football Complex) or my biggest pet peeve, the chia-bull outside of the Marshall Center($25,000+ for that embarassment), and thinks that these are the best means of spending their construction budgets. I've actually come to despise the construction company that seems to do all of our expansion work, because I feel like they are hustling us by not offering a higher quality service for us to spend our money on. While it has some serious high points, our campus as a whole seems like it was made in a "point and drop" SimCity game. I hear lots of students make comments on this. Just like our student body, the campus has no obvious binding factor, and in turn it is very hard to develop a sort of empathetic connection to it.