Some of you can't see the forest for the trees. You're missing the argument. I used Leavitt in reference to standards. There are many ways to cut a cattle; some of you are cutting it the wrong way. I mention Leavitt because he is the moniker of success at USF. Inherited program or not, RMC must go. His conference records are 1-15, 5-11, 1-15, and 3-13. How does that show any sign of promise? And don't play the "what if†card because it doesn't work. What if such and such wasn't kicked off or injured...blah blah...it's not valid. I mean what if Matt Grothe wasn't injured against ECU? We could've had another 30 points. However, he was injured. It is what it is. My point about RMC previous record @ WMU is valid. What did he do at WMU that was spectacular enough to coach here? Typically, losing programs bring in coaches that have been associated with a winning program to right their ship: Amaker=U of M, Calipairi =Memphis, B. Davis=UNC(football)....despite the fact that it doesn't always spell success. Anyone who can sit her and substantiate that a coach should be given another shot after seasons of 1-15, 5-11, 1-15, and 3-13, does not care about USF basketball. This is ridiculous. Are we going to keep him around so we can go 4-12 in conference play in 08? Come on, let's have some standards. Let’s take pride in all of our programs. The tradition of losing needs to go.