Jump to content

ArmyBull

Member
  • Posts

    1,828
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Posts posted by ArmyBull

  1. 12 minutes ago, Triple B said:

    It's a drawback but not a deal killer reading that whole paragraph ...

    South Florida: USF has Tier 1 job potential, especially when it builds an on-campus football facility that will feature an indoor practice facility. The lack of an on-campus stadium is a drawback, but Tampa is a strong area for recruiting, and the team won consistently under Jim Leavitt and had 21 combined wins in 2016 and 2017.

     

    Man, thought for sure that would push you 100% into the OCS camp. 

  2. 3 hours ago, smazza said:the stadium issue has nothing to do with usf's struggles on the field


    No, but the article is about job appeal/perception.  Perception becomes reality.  ESPN think less of us because we do not have an OCS.  Perception is powerful and is listed as a “drawback”. 
     

    Recruits read these articles, ADs read these articles.  Having the lack of an OCS listed as a drawback is not great. 

  3. This is from an ESPN+ article, so I will not post the whole thing.  At least we made the list, how goes the OCS?  I'll hang up and listen.

    http://insider.espn.com/college-football/insider/story/_/id/29268130/college-football-coaching-job-tiers-boise-state-houston-ucf-most-attractive-group-5

    Tier 2 jobs: Solid footing with finances, facilities and support; access to good regional recruiting areas; competes often for league championships, regularly makes bowls and occasionally challenges for the New Year's Six; some history of wins against the Power 5 (recent or long term); solid local or regional fan base.

    South Florida: USF has Tier 1 job potential, especially when it builds an on-campus football facility that will feature an indoor practice facility. The lack of an on-campus stadium is a drawback, but Tampa is a strong area for recruiting, and the team won consistently under Jim Leavitt and had 21 combined wins in 2016 and 2017.

     

  4. 1 minute ago, puc86 said:

    Because his overall record was abysmal and he holds the record for having the worst season in UsF history and being the only one to lose to a KB level team. He has no wins of note and although he had a single good season there didn’t appear to be a plan in place after Q but I’m sure it will look a lot more like his only good year of coaching than every other year he has had in a decade, because feelings.

    Mic drop

    • Haha 1
  5. Resume:

    10 years of head coaching experience.

    0-1 in bowl games. (That’s right, present for 1 bowl game in 10 years and lost it).

    Overall record of 56-62.

    One season of 9 wins or more.

    Zero conference championships won.

    Zero conference championships played for.

    .... but yet, some are acting like CWT was our savior.  I just don’t get it.  We can do better.

     

     

  6. 3 hours ago, usf97 said:

    Is there a 3rd option?

     - I like Jim Leavitt. We should build him a statue or honor him at a game like Maryland did for Ralph Friedgen. Move forward. 

    This x1000, people act like you must either be for him coming back or you hate his guts and always have.  Build the statue and look to the future. 

  7. 6 hours ago, NewEnglandBull said:

    Comments from Kelly:

    thanked CCS for contribution

    MK visited at 2:00 to fire him

    meet with other staff after that about recruiting 

    meet with players after to give the news to them ...told them to focus grades and workouts

    all of this was done in 1.5 hours

    moving forward: search started last night

    will not use search firm

    was on the phone last night

    no public comments until when they announce a new coach.

    he is very energized about the program moving forward...the best yet to come 

    ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS:

    Not going to pin in a time line 

    buyout is considerable. Not paid out in a lump sum

    financially the buyout will not hurt in getting a new coach. Will be in top half of salary in AAC

    Will be open minded to different levels of experience. Need someone who wants to make their mark here.

    Strong took the news well

    came to the decision to fire Strong on Saturday 

    Continuing to make the facilities better. Was a factor in strong’s lack of success but not the only factor. 
     

    USF athletics is at a critical juncture. Have to realize the AAC plays big boy football. Must find ways to win the conference and move beyond

    people need to be open minded about different coaches he will interview 

    MK had consultation with the USF Pres and board before firing

    he has received many calls for the position

    Anticipates some recruits will stay and some will leave

    next coach has to have good PR skills and comfortable in getting out into the community to sell the program.

    existing coaching staff is on contract now and will recruit but their long term future is up to the new coach.

    Players understood the professional aspect of the situation when MK talked to them

    MK is open to talking to former players and expects to talk to them in the coming days. But the ultimate decision is his.

    MK has a short list right now. Using his contacts from the past.

    hoped that the team would push forward after being 4-4.

     

    This was excellent.  Thanks for the efforts. 

  8. Just now, Triple B said:

    Discussion on a message board pertaining to someone being several games away from being fired is hopefully not the evidence you were referring to. CWT was definitely on the hot seat going into the season but there's nothing that supports him not being given the whole season by Harlan to continue progress.

    By the way, an OCS would increase attendance.   

  9. 2 minutes ago, Triple B said:

    I actually agree with that but when you started talking about "a whole lot of evidence at the time" supporting the 2 games away from firing scenario, it changed the narrative .......

    Should I have said 3 games?  C'mon man, straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel here.  I am sure there is a thread, or 7, from 2015 that this was discussed in great detail.  

  10. 3 minutes ago, Ghostbuster said:

    Lol.  So I’ve got you down as a “willfully ignorant”, good to know for future discussions.

     

    2 minutes ago, GaUSFBull said:

    But he wasn't.  And he obviously survived the hot seat so your equation is completely bogus.

    Just admit it, you don't like the guy personally so you are inventing reasons why you don't want him here.

    Again, feel free to disagree, call me ignorant, and whatever else makes you feel better.  But yes, my opinion is that he was absolutely close to being fired and that will not change.  You have a different opinion and I am okay with that, you also need to be okay with that.

    On a separate note, I am over not taking the next step, we have the talent to win the conference and that should be the expectation every year.  If a coach can't get that done in three years, time to move on.  Again, my opinion, so relax fellas, it will be alright.    

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.