Jump to content

Roaming Bull

Member
  • Posts

    9,756
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by Roaming Bull

  1. 41 minutes ago, LrdNorman said:

    1st Analysis:

    USF vs Syracuse
    Thursday, December 21, 2023
    8:00 pm ET, ESPN

    No Research Instant Analysis: USF will bring the intensity. It’s not like this year’s team is all that great, but it’s well coached, and it’s on the upswing in a stepping-stone year. But will Syracuse show up as it waits to get the Fran Brown era started? Yup. Let’s start the bidding at 250 Orange rushing yards.

    First Thought Bowl Prediction: Syracuse 45, USF 13
    Line: Syracuse -5.5, o/u: 57.5

    image.jpeg.505438c29cda3870a94d29fc6bb6d33b.jpeg

  2. 13 minutes ago, Bull94 said:

    Texas beat the sec champ. otherwise georgia gets in over them and fsu

    That loss to OK is a mulligan? Or what? FSU didn’t lose a game. The ACC only had 3 schools that were below .500. The Big 12 has UCF and 5 schools with below .500. Outside of that Bama win Texas beat basically nobody. Ok St is there other best win. FSU beat LSU and a ranked Louisville, plus most of their opponents were above .500. Texas being in over them doesn’t add up.

  3. 1 hour ago, GoBulls84 said:

    LOL. FSU already had one foot out the door. This doesn't change anything in that regard. And the Big 12's current playoff representative is headed to the SEC next year. There can't seriously be anybody amongst those schools that feel like being in the Big 12 will be demonstrably better than the ACC after FSU and Clemson leave. They're going to dissolve the GOR and forego the hundreds of millions in buyout money from FSU and Clemson?

    Agreed. That post is asinine. No way those schools want to move down to the B12. They may have reached out to whoever is left in the B12 to see if they want to come over to the ACC though. The smart play for those schools is to collect the money from whoever leaves, then do whatever their hearts desire. If dissolution to create a new conference is what they want pop off sis.

    • Upvote 1
  4. 9 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

    Imagine if the deal was STrong had to keep weist and the Gulf Coast offense. Strong should have only focused on his speciality the defense.

    That should’ve been the deal. If Strong didn’t like it we should’ve let him walk. If a coach fails at a school like Texas it should be a red flag. He had near unlimited resources and was at the preeminent football school for the state and couldn’t get it done. His philosophy and how he handled the players seemed shortsighted.

    Had we just elevated Weist we would’ve been in a better position imo. We also probably would’ve side stepped the Scott error.

    • Upvote 1
  5. Just now, USFBulls12 said:

    And that's the conference we're hoping to get into, one with this level of disrespect? Oy vey, we're never going to have nice things, are we?

    Maybe FSU/Clemson can take that juju or stigma with them to the SEC when they change conferences? We all know this is mainly Clemson’s fault. Going 2-2 in the championship game is just not good enough to help your conference.

  6. Is the ACC stuck on the secret language in the contract? You know the guarantee of a conference spot if we win the game? I think if we lose we have to name the stadium Doak Campbell II for 20 years or change our colors to match Clemson, or something like something like that. Either way we have no option, but to win this game

  7. Is FSU playing their way out of the top 4 by not dominating Louisville?

    with the bulldogs losing will Ohio St., Texas, Bama, or Oregon be in? Could you imagine 2 PAC-12 teams and no SEC, or 2 Big 10 teams and no SEC. Would blow some minds. FSU, Michigan, Washington, and ????. Unless FSU poops the bed and opens the door for the sec.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.