Jump to content

Nebolsky

Member
  • Posts

    293
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Nebolsky

  1. 1 hour ago, dclenden said:

    Neolsky and whose your data- you're missing the story line and the point and the messaging.  Adaptation is the talking point.  Not CWT or not giving Strong enough leash or other. Front and center: what you're doing isn't working so start thinking outside the frame.

    oppositional is easy- reasoning is far more difficult.  

    Look. I am not at all impressed with what I have seen from the offense the last two games.  I do agree that the play calling is questionable. However, I have seen worse play calling that resulted in a loss against an fcs team and 2 and 4 win seasons.  

    I am just not ready to call for heads and am willing to wait until we get into conference play. I am sure they will make some changes because everyone has a point to prove. Guess I'm running on faith. 

  2. 6 minutes ago, Who'sYourData? said:

    This is freaking hilarious.  For two complete season CWT tried desperately to be a power running team with players that were completely not fit for that scheme.  And now we get to hear stories about how great CWT was at fitting an offense around his talent?  Not hardly.

    I think we need to give Strong and his staff more than two games that were wins before melting down.  But I especially think we need to stop with the revisionist history that CWT was a brilliant offensive mind that didn't stubbornly try to cram his system in, no matter the cost.  That is simply completely untrue.

    Amen. I remember many nights of frustration with the offense under CWT. I'm glad he eventually got it together, but those were tough times.

  3. I do agree that the play calling has not been what we are accustomed to (the potent aggressive style). But I won't go as far as saying it is atrocious, especially after game 2.  We had a few dropped passes that would have put us in some pretty sweet spots, and that's unfortunate.  

    In terms of stubbornness, let's not forget it took CWT almost 2 and a half seasons to play to the players strengths (talk about square pegs and round holes).  

    I have faith in our new coaching staff. They are not completely oblivious and don't see what we see. They have the same goal in mind.. Win. I don't see it taking 2 seasons to make changes. 

    I do see one thing though, we are 2-0 in games we would have lost 2 seasons ago.  Let's put down the pitchforks and let the staff do it's thing. We can revisit this conversation around game 7. I hope to say "told you so, just needed a little faith"

    • Upvote 1
    • Downvote 1
  4. 6 hours ago, NewEnglandBull said:

    Game is a nooner

    That's what I thought at first.. But then I checked ESPN.com and it said 11. But now my ESPN app is dating noon.  Either way I'll be there. 

    Anyone know where the away section is? I would prefer to be around fellow bulls. 

  5. I just read Joey Knight's TBT bulletin about college football magazines, and this quote from Athlon is just ridiculous:

    "The initial wave of college football preview magazines has crashed upon newsstands, spraying hype all over USF.
    But the adoration is accompanied by some snark. 

    .....

    Additionally, Athlon highlights this quote -- from an "opposing AAC assistant coach" -- about the Bulls:  
    "They have real athletes in that program, and they can get them , but the school has to step up and look at UCF's level of commitment."

    This has got to be a joke.

    Rest of story: http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/bulls/preseason-magazines-praise-poke-usf/2324680

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.