atsKnight
-
Posts
139 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
News
Videos YouTube
SuperQuote
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by atsKnight
-
-
16 minutes ago, Triple B said:
Not sure exactly your question here but the BE did split apart, after being raided, into basketball and football schools. The football schools then raided CUSA forming the AAC ...
From the article: “Also, we have history to look at. The Big East used to exist as a football conference. When the ACC came calling, it was all over in the blink of an eye. Nobody in the Big East attempted to patch the holes as the ship sank.
The league just splintered and collapsed.”
It didn’t collapse. It raided CUSA and changed its name to the AAC. The history completely disproves the author’s point.
-
2
-
-
15 hours ago, NewEnglandBull said:
Can The PAC-12's Baghdad Bob Commissioner Save The Conference?
Will the PAC-12 survive if more teams leave? Can George Kliavkoff stop...
This is a ridiculously bad article. The PAC 12 would have no leverage? Even with two teams, they would have a lot of leverage. The Big East split apart? Is that what happened? I thought they raided CUSA.
I don’t love when fans post their random opinion as an article, but I guess that’s realignment journalism these days.
-
On 12/19/2019 at 3:35 AM, smazza said:
we need to care as they are our rivals
they are the benchmark
usf isnt going anywhere unless we beat the orlando school
This is a good response to a strange thought. Y'all are so confident in where you're heading that you don't care where your competitors for the division title are at? You probably should.
I guarantee you that UCF fans are paying attention to Cinci, Houston, and Memphis during the off-season.
-
Great username.
-
I love this board SO much. This thread is fantastic. I never get tired of how USF fans see their program.
"We were number 2 once!"
"We've had good attendance in the past!"
"2-for-1's are a sign of respect!"
"We're bottom feeders in the AAC because we're too good for it!"
Please keep going, I could listen to this stuff forever.
-
45 minutes ago, Gat-Rat Bull said:
I like how this guy thinks. Not that USF is helping the case this year and not that this guy's opinion will change anything. I still agree that the AAC is better than the ACC in football this year. Too bad everyone seems to have bought into the P5 and G5 nomenclature. Years like this one really do show that trying to draw a hard line between quality programs by treating an entire conference as "power" is a farce. I have spoken.
https://fansided.com/2019/11/16/aac-replace-acc-power-5/amp/
The break up of the Big East came at a bad time for us. We were forced to accept whatever the P5 wanted to give us. If the AAC looked then as it does now, the two groups of schools would not have gotten locked into the same arrangement.
-
22 hours ago, Ron Lighthall said:
Not the best this year by any stretch.... Dillusional. Tulsa was a complete mental breakdown, unrecoverable late in the game. Discipline was Bonn resistant.
*shrug
It's a rebuilding year with a freshman QB. Some of us saw this coming. Some of us bought into the playoff talk.
-
On 10/10/2019 at 4:57 PM, Bull Nut said:
I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for a response. Their fan base has dropped by 50% after only two losses...
It was already responded to previously.
But it is less fun to talk football when your team is out of contention for a playoff spot or NY6 bowl.
-
6 minutes ago, atsKnight said:
So how you deal with trolls is to babysit them and give them the attention they're looking for?
Ok, now I'm thinking you're not a UCF parody, you're just a Bullspen-level USF fan.
At this point, I think there is plenty of evidence that you come to this board to troll. People that don't like trolls ignore them, but you initiate more arguments than you respond to.
You also ignore any logical progression that you don't agree with and seem to be looking for opportunities for 'zingers' rather than finishing any debates. I doubt you've ever admitted to being wrong on this board.
If we're both concerned the other is trolling, let's just go our separate ways and agree to disagree. I'll have you on ignore from here on out. Good luck and God bless.
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, Triple B said:
I'm more baby sitter than prey in this scenario ....
So how you deal with trolls is to babysit them and give them the attention they're looking for?
Ok, now I'm thinking you're not a UCF parody, you're just a Bullspen-level USF fan.
-
14 minutes ago, Triple B said:
The only one recognizing you as troll who doesn't troll is you. You are the quintessential troll ... just limited in your hunting grounds.
So you're the prey on this scenario?
Again, having trouble believing this isn't some parody account. What is something only someone who went to USF would know?
-
17 minutes ago, Triple B said:
Because your only chance of survival on the site is to post here ...
So now I'm a troll who doesn't troll because he's afraid of trolling?
What is the chance that you're a UCF fan pretending to be a USF fan to make USF look dumb? If that is it, please stop. And especially now after they got their asses kicked, now would be a good time to give them a break. Wasn't right for them to gloat over us from the Big East, doesn't make it right to gloat/mock them now.
-
2 hours ago, SquareKnight said:
Well...I'm not atsKnight, but here you go. Don't think there is much either side can argue about this.
1997 UCF
1998 UCF
1999 UCF
2000 UCF
2001 Toss Up
2002 Toss Up
2003 USF
2004 USF
2005 USF
2006 USF
2007 USF
2008 USF
2009 USF
2010 UCF
2011 USF
2012 UCF
2013 UCF
2014 UCF
2015 USF
2016 USF
2017 UCF
2018 UCF
I'm not sure if trying to have a reasonable debate is going to work around here right now, SquareKnight.
Good on you for making the attempt, though.
-
11 hours ago, Triple B said:
You know in his mind he's pwning us ....
If all I'm interested in is pwning y'all, why am I not commenting on the games today? If I'm a troll, why do I stay off the main board and respond more than initiate?
I've been quite consistent: I'm here for interesting conversations with a fanbase that is at a fascinating point in their history. I'm not trying to embarrass anyone, but I do get frustrated that y'all haven't been able to keep up like other fanbases have. It's tough to have interesting conversations when y'all don't read or understand the threads.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, DJBulls said:
You seem to be missing my point that Nortre Dame lost the national championship game and the vaunted Colley Matrix listed them on the top of their ranking...because of that absurdity, the NCAA won't directly state they are co-champions.
They do, it's in the record book, which we've been discussing this whole time.
10 minutes ago, DJBulls said:I'm not going to argue this nonsense with you any longer...
That sounds good to me.
-
45 minutes ago, Triple B said:
You mean besides the real 2017 national champions?
I already stated we know Bama's position on it. 4 official sources to 0, any more thoughts?
-
14 minutes ago, atsKnight said:
I'd be surprised if it doesn't just say it that way in the record book. Y'all claimed it wasn't obvious, but again, USF reading comprehension. I'll take a look.
This would be funny if it wasn't so sad. There are championship references everywhere in that section. This is getting less fun.
-
3 minutes ago, DJBulls said:
Actually want the NCAA to tell me that Notre Dame is a co-national champion...I want those words to come from them...
Are you serious? Please tell me you graduated from USF.
I'll do my best to break it down for you:
-Notre Dame, UCF, and Utah all are listed in the record book as being picked by major selectors.
-Utah and UCF (officially) interpret this to mean that they have a share of the National Championship.
-ESPN confirmed UCF's interpretation.
Why would the next rational step be to find someone who interprets it that way for ND or else it's not true? You now have 3 official sources interpreting a 4th official source the same way. Can you even find one that supports your opinion?
I'd be surprised if it doesn't just say it that way in the record book. Y'all claimed it wasn't obvious, but again, USF reading comprehension. I'll take a look.
-
16 minutes ago, DJBulls said:
The key thing they are trying to lay their hat on (well it's right there in the record book) is the same piece of information giving no indication that they are co-champions...
Ok, well so far ESPN, Utah, and our stadium interpret that information one way. On the other side all we have are the opinions of Bulls fans.
Can you find something that says, "Clearly the NCAA was just noting the selector in the record book, not declaring a national champion"?
-
22 minutes ago, Fold FB Invest in BB said:
Maybe if you started your own topic, it would be easier for everyone to focus.
But then I would face even more trolling accusations. For now, I just reply when replied to for the most part.
-
3 minutes ago, Fold FB Invest in BB said:
You’re missing out on some quality toilet humor.
I'm feeling pretty good about the decision so far. I don't like to leave messages directed at me without replies, so going on every rabbit trail and misinterpretation with him was exhausting.
-
1 minute ago, Triple B said:
Nothing to figure out. Nowhere in that record book does NCAA call you co-champions or champions of any kind......... I am biased but not blind.
Ok, can you find an ESPN or other media source that says that?
-
2 minutes ago, Triple B said:
Satan's tool is Twitter, not you, to avoid any confusion.
I appreciate the clarification.
-
5 minutes ago, Fold FB Invest in BB said:
@JTruewas right.
I've got him on ignore, so I'm not sure what you're referring to.
Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"
in USF South Florida Bulls Athletics
Posted
I would agree with that if CUSA annexed the remaining four football schools, but I’m ok agreeing to disagree. I usually just lurk on this board, but the logic in that article was bad enough that it deserved a comment.