BaltoBull Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 490 Reputation: 13 Days Won: 1 Joined: 07/19/2006 Share Posted July 1, 2008 http://www.fanblogs.com/sec/007610.phpInteresting article..."The Saban Rule?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullschmutz Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,296 Reputation: 117 Days Won: 2 Joined: 10/17/2007 Share Posted July 1, 2008 I'd like to slap Nick Satan with a live, oily fish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who'sYourData? Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,396 Reputation: 929 Days Won: 24 Joined: 09/01/2006 Share Posted July 1, 2008 I'd like to slap Nick Satan with a live, oily fish.LOLDoes the Big East allow non-qualifiers? I thought we were losing recruits to C-USA because we didn't allow non-qualifiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Share Posted July 1, 2008 I'd like to slap Nick Satan with a live, oily fish.How can you slap him with himself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull Martin Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 8,044 Reputation: 228 Days Won: 9 Joined: 12/23/2005 Share Posted July 1, 2008 You’ve gotta give Saban sp? (Satan?) credit. His unsubstantiated crack at USF gave him what he wanted.On the surface he was taking a shot at USF, but beneath the surface he was jealous. After watching USF in the running for a lot of Auburn, Alabama, and South Carolina kids this is what they do. We weren't stealing non-qualifiers from them. We were stealing qualifiers. It'll be interesting to see how this works out for USF. I hope it doesn't have an impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiTownBull Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 5,691 Reputation: 1 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/27/2001 Share Posted July 1, 2008 I'd like to slap Nick Satan with a live, oily fish.LOLDoes the Big East allow non-qualifiers? I thought we were losing recruits to C-USA because we didn't allow non-qualifiers.I believe you are correct that the BE does not accept partial qualifiers. Buie came in when we were still in CUSA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deters Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 291 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/29/2007 Share Posted July 1, 2008 I'd like to slap Nick Satan with a live, oily fish.LOLDoes the Big East allow non-qualifiers? I thought we were losing recruits to C-USA because we didn't allow non-qualifiers.If they do i think it's 1 a year or w/e, but if i had to guess i would lean towards no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 64,923 Reputation: 2,106 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted July 1, 2008 GOOD MOVE BY seC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NormalBull Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,797 Reputation: 1 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/20/2002 Share Posted July 1, 2008 Please tell me that you are not taking this spoof piece seriously. Did y'all get your degrees at CFU CC? Senator Blutarski? Get real people. Good gracious.Normal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltoBull Posted July 1, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 490 Reputation: 13 Days Won: 1 Joined: 07/19/2006 Author Share Posted July 1, 2008 Please tell me that you are not taking this spoof piece seriously. Did y'all get your degrees at CFU CC? Senator Blutarski? Get real people. Good gracious. Normal Normal, I did some more digging and this is what I found on the SEC website... 14.5.4.2 Partial and Non-qualifiers. A partial or non-qualifier, who initially enrolls at a two-year college (junior college) and transfers to an SEC member institution, shall not be eligible for financial aid, practice or competition unless the following requirements have been met: [Revised 6/3/93] (a) Graduated with an Associate or equivalent degree in an academic, rather than a vocational, curriculum (see NCAA Bylaw 14.5.4.5.4); [Revised 6/3/05] ( Completed satisfactorily a minimum of 48 semester or 72 quarter hours with a cumulative grade point average of 2.00 of transferable degree credit accepted toward any baccalaureate degree program at the certifying institution; © Attended the two-year college that granted the Associate of Arts degree as a full-time student for the last three semesters or four quarters immediately prior to graduation from the institution granting the two-year degree (excluding summer terms); [Revised 6/1/02] (d) Earned at least six credit hours of transferable English with a minimum cumulative grade point average of 2.00 in these credit hours (Effective August 1, 2008; for student-athletes first enrolling at an SEC institution on or after August 1, 2008 correspondence, extension and distance learning courses may not be used to fulfill this requirement); and [Revised 6/5/99 effective August 1, 1999 for student-athletes first entering a SEC institution on or after Fall semester/quarter; Revised 6/1/2007] (e) Earned at least three credit hours of transferable math with a minimum cumulative grade point average of 2.00 in these credit hours (Effective August 1, 2008; for student-athletes first enrolling at an SEC institution on or after August 1, 2008 correspondence, extension and distance learning courses may not be used to fulfill this requirement). [Revised 6/1/02 effective June 1, 2003; Revised 6/1/2007] http://www.secsports.com/local/compliance/bylaw_14.pdf I'm not claiming to know what the SEC's rules concerning Partial and Non-Qualifiers was originally, is 2.00 lower than what it was? I honestly don't know if by not allowing correspondence, extension and distance learning courses if the standards are being raised or lowered. Maybe someone with knowledge of this wouldn't mind chiming in. However, I am willing to suggest that the article linked at the top of the discussion was onto something if there are, in fact revised standards effective August 1st. I apologize in advance if I am wrong about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.