JvilleRandy

Since when is this up to the university? The new coach will decide who stays.

Like what? It has been that way since the 1970's. Why would the school start worrying about it now?

Really? The attendance at your last home game was 36,190. Miami's last attendance figure was 38,869. And remember, USF and its half a million students is right down the road from the stadium. As for typos, when you see me type "da", point it out. Until then, work on your temper. Miami fans didn't show up to games in 2001, when Miami had arguably the best team of all time. So your theory about fans reacting to the ban is inaccurate.

The death penalty was not and is not an option. Not sure where that even comes from. It's a "ban", not a "band". In any event, what does a bowl "band" have to do with finances? The ACC splits bowl revenue. And what does a bowl "band" have to do with empty seats? Bowls are played at neutral sites. And why on earth would a USF fan be talking about attendance in the first place?

What is the precedent for that? The NCAA can do whatever it wants to do. If Miami is hoping to fall on its sword to avoid the death penalty then they might succeed in avoiding that punishment, but they are not getting off Scott free. The NCAA will still lay down the hammer on Miami and it will not be a soft hit. Death penalty? LOL. Stopped reading.

What is the precedent for that?

The real punishment would be if the NCAA forces Miami to hire Skip Holtz. Talk about bowl bans.