jg233

I'd make him the Head Coach over Scott...A bag of dog shat would be better.

1 hour ago, hm101 said:

Tulsa was the best ranked of these next 4 (now 3) games... I didn't EXPECT to win but rather thought this was likely. We were ranked in the 110s while Tulsa was 70s. 

Tulane, ECU, Temple I do actually expect to win, and if you give me UCF I am a happy customer in 2021. 

You expect to win against Tulane, Temple and ECU?  What leads you to believe beating them is possible?  Scott won't let them win even if they are in position to.

Scott is a loser and his team plays like losers.

It's difficult to like anything about this team.

1 minute ago, Orlando Bull said:

Are we actually trying to lose?

Seems that way.

3 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said:

In my opinion, once the 3 leave, we will be behind the MWC. 

This is a definite.

Improvement needs to be shown this season.  The conference will be much weaker in a few years and we need a coach that can consistently keep us in the top third of the conference.  Hopefully that is BG.

Football is one thing, but men's basketball going from the best league in history to a mid major league in a ten year span is crazy.  

2 minutes ago, E.T. said:

Makes sense if you want to improve your conference.

That hasn't helped us one bit.  UCF has always scheduled much easier OOC than us.  Win more conference games and people will notice just as much. 

4 minutes ago, CousinRicky said:

Schedules are done years in advance.  People complain that we get no good teams coming into RayJay and then when we get good teams people complain.  Pretty difficult running a college athletic department.

This is true, but scheduling Alabama, Louisville and NC St. in the same year makes no sense for us to do at any point.

5 minutes ago, E.T. said:

I like scheduling the P5 Teams! You never know how good they will be when you schedule t6hese games years in advance. Next year isn't scary . . . Florida will most likely be Top 25 and doubt L'ville will be. Not sure about BYU in Tamplona and we'll have an easy time with Howard. 

And I don't think anyone is using this schedule as an excuse ... it's a tough schedule and we are not good enough to beat them . . . simple facts.

Go BULLS !!!

Hoping you can go 2-2 in the OOC is not ideal for us right now.   That looks like 1-3 again next year unless things change drastically.  Having to win 5 conference games just to get bowl eligible looks like it might be a tall task for a while.

We schedule like it is ten years ago.  At this point we should play one p5, one CUSA, one Sun Belt/MAC, one FCS.  In the future, we should be scheduling to get bowl eligible and not to impress anyone with how many P4 teams can kick our asses in one year.

24 minutes ago, Jim Johnson said:

Might be a tad high.

Considering Bethune might bring a few fans, I'm gonna go with 1350.

Men's Basketball opener vs Bethune, 4pm on a Tuesday

Place should be packed.

Navy's defense is undersized and outmanned but they play hard every play, which is the opposite of ours.

41 minutes ago, bulloni said:

CONTEXT. He has plenty of runs that he'll carry guys for 5-6 yards. But when you get his volume of short yardage attempts it ***** up your ypc. Look at his ypc not including SUCCESSFUL short yardage attempts:

NC State: 5 carries 26 yards (5.2)

Florida: 8 carries 29 yards. 2 yard touchdown, 2 yard run on 3rd and 1 in the redzone to move the chains, 1 yard touchdown. Take away those and its 4.8 ypc.

FAMU: 7 carries 27 yards. First and goal from the 7, gave him 3 carries to punch it in the endzone. Take away those and its 5 ypc.

BYU: 26 carries for 86 yards. 2 yard run to convert 1st down in the redzone. two 3 yard runs to convert 1st down on 3rd down in BYU territory. 2 yard TD run. 1 yard run to convert 4th down in red zone. Then they gave him 3 chances to bang away 1 yard for a TD. Take away those and its 4.1 ypc

SMU he was getting stuffed though

Whatever makes you feel better.  He is a solid short yardage back that lacks speed and elusiveness.

11 minutes ago, USFRaider said:

As of now, both Houston and Tulane look like they will kick our asses, but it is a ways until November.

I think it is in Jeff Scott's best interests to not get our asses kicked by a potentially 2-8 or 1-9 Tulane team.

43 minutes ago, jjlovecub said:

Seriously? That’s what happens when you get the ball at the 2 yard line. You score that much - when we have had several years not being able to score on the goal line - you are a stud. 

The problem is he has almost as many carries as Battie and Joiner combined and they are getting 6 and 5 ypc respectively.  I have no problem with Mangham getting the ball inside the 5 or in short yardage situations, but that's the only time he should get it. 

Tulane 1-5 with SMU and Cincy their next two games...not gonna be a good year for them.

12 hours ago, jjlovecub said:

STUD

Ha!  3.3ypc and 38 ypg

Solid short yardage back, that's about it.

Brinkman needs to never play again.

That's on McClain, but there is no reason to not kick the fg with :09 left...Scott is dumb as f$%k

We don't even have football players on defense...I don't know what they are

Scott is garbage...if I were McClain, I would transfer somewhere better after the season.  McClain is the only thing to like on the team.

It is tough to like this team.