Jump to content

SJT

Member
  • Posts

    124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SJT

  1. Tags is trying to run the Stanford run heavy offense here without the necessary offensive line. It's not working and you are putting this young qb in a bad spot when you have 3rd and long to go on every series. He needs to adapt this team to what works instead of forcing horrible play calls that results in failure every time.

  2. Here is something to consider: Jimmy Johnson went 1-11 in his first year as coach of the Cowboys after taking over from Landry who went 3-13 the previous year. In year 3, the Cowboys won 11 games and won the super bowl in year 4. I think you will see this team improve over the two years as Tags gets his type of players , although I am not predicting national championship by year 4 :)

  3. I really think Tags should ditch the motion/shifting for the remainder of the season. The inability of the players to line up properly after the shifts and the inability of the QB's to snap the ball after the players are set makes the shifting more of a hindrance than a benefit. It seems like just lining up in the formation we want to be in when we snap the ball would be more beneficial than setting our offense up to fail by using motion packages which they currently can't execute. This is something he can get back to really emphasizing in the spring as the players should be more comfortable the second camp around.

  4. All of this motion crap is confusing our offense instead of the opponent's defense. Many penalties by our offense are a result of confusion. White looked better against houston because the offensive plays were simplified. Cwt needs to scrap this stanford offense till the off season, and put in a simplified offense for the last few games.

  5.  

     

     

    they had a weird cult like vibe over there.

     

    a group all fell in line behind that turd. called him coach turd or something weird. it was like they were al trying to be his favorite.

     

    he was an odd one that would use personal attacks when you didn't fall in line.he would pick out a player every few years and just constantly rail on him. Daniels, Alvarado. it was strange

     

    they tormented that poor guy steve all the time.

     

    I may have thrown out that offer prematurely ... 

     

     

    Yeah, Steve O'Neal was so tormented that we (many of us) met regularly in lot 6D to laugh, joke, chew the fat about USF athletics and clank beers.  This is why most of those guys won't use TBP, there are too many idiots on this site acting like they know something when they know less than nothing.  Clowns.

     

    funny how you say people here use personal attacks and here you are using them.

     

    turd ran off plenty of people that had dissenting opinions. that's why the only ones left all agreed with the exception of steve.

     

    he used to denigrate players all the time. Bruce Daniels. He went on about ASlvardo for years even after he left. it was strange. like he was obsessed with them.

     

    maybe you weren't one of turds underlings.

     

    I think that's great you clanked beers. I too clanked beers with him. I didn't need to insult him online though.

     

    doesn't change the fact that turd and his underlings were jerks to him online and it wasn't just him.I can't remember the sign in but those guys railed on one guy mercilessly.

     

    anytime he showed up to voice an opinion it was time to start the personal insults all to gain favor with lord turd.they couldn't even argue the point. just insulted the guy.

     

    BTW this was just an observation from an ouitsider. no need to attack. I just wanted to comment on the weird cult like obsession with turd.

     

    didn't you guys call him coach and then you were each some sort of assistant?

     

    I used to read that blog regularly.....what are you talking about ?  It was Steve O who hurled insults towards everyone with exclamations regularly who didnt agree with him....i may not have agreed with some of Turd's view points but towards the end some of Steve O's insults were down right nasty.  Its ok to have a different view point and disagree with other posters.  Some of you guys take this way too seriously.  

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.