Rizman Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 2,376 Content Count: 21,474 Reputation: 940 Days Won: 10 Joined: 01/02/2007 Share Posted August 15, 2016 Nice to see our team really put in some hard work this year. If you read the article, we have players that got stronger compared to previous years. Hopefully this will translate onto the field. http://www.tampabay.com/sports/college/usf-beefing-up-for-football-season/2289449 Mass appeal A look at some of USF's weight gains during the Willie Taggart era Average weight 2013 offensive line: 296.4 Projected 2016 line: 316.2 2013 defensive line: 262.8 Projected 2016 line: 271.3 Top 3 rushers in 2013: 196.3 Top 3 tailbacks in 2016: 209.3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrue Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 150 Content Count: 19,395 Reputation: 6,097 Days Won: 233 Joined: 01/13/2011 Share Posted August 15, 2016 That was some fantastic Holtz hating if you saw anything in that article about current progress compared to previous. As we get further and further from CSH, I look forward to how we can squeeze in a dig where it's virtually impossible to do so. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedyBull Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 44 Content Count: 1,705 Reputation: 221 Days Won: 3 Joined: 01/25/2013 Share Posted August 15, 2016 Hopefully it all adds up to a magical season! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptorcj Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 18 Content Count: 8,878 Reputation: 1,266 Days Won: 28 Joined: 07/12/2013 Share Posted August 15, 2016 Clearly the difference is muscle though. The CSH guys were mostly just fat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDYZR Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 487 Content Count: 12,550 Reputation: 2,942 Days Won: 25 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted August 15, 2016 26 minutes ago, raptorcj said: Clearly the difference is muscle though. The CSH guys were mostly just fat. and tired... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisa el Toro Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 132 Content Count: 10,380 Reputation: 1,058 Days Won: 18 Joined: 08/11/2003 Share Posted August 15, 2016 2 hours ago, raptorcj said: Clearly the difference is muscle though. The CSH guys were mostly just fat. 1 hour ago, BDYZR said: and tired... But they got lots of hugs and were shown pictures of rainbows and puppy dogs at every team meeting. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaUSFBull Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 263 Content Count: 24,750 Reputation: 3,107 Days Won: 87 Joined: 12/15/2009 Share Posted August 15, 2016 3 hours ago, JTrue said: That was some fantastic Holtz hating if you saw anything in that article about current progress compared to previous. As we get further and further from CSH, I look forward to how we can squeeze in a dig where it's virtually impossible to do so. You were the first one to bring up Holtz. I know Uncle Skippy is near and dear to your heart, but any "Holtz hating" after your post is really brought on from your statement alone. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fold FB Invest in BB Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 76 Content Count: 6,712 Reputation: 1,131 Days Won: 17 Joined: 09/07/2009 Share Posted August 15, 2016 3 hours ago, Rizman said: Nice to see our team really put in some hard work this year. If you read the article, we have players that got stronger compared to previous years. Hopefully this will translate onto the field. http://www.tampabay.com/sports/college/usf-beefing-up-for-football-season/2289449 Mass appeal A look at some of USF's weight gains during the Willie Taggart era Average weight 2013 offensive line: 296.4 Projected 2016 line: 316.2 2013 defensive line: 262.8 Projected 2016 line: 271.3 Top 3 rushers in 2013: 196.3 Top 3 tailbacks in 2016: 209.3 3 hours ago, JTrue said: That was some fantastic Holtz hating if you saw anything in that article about current progress compared to previous. As we get further and further from CSH, I look forward to how we can squeeze in a dig where it's virtually impossible to do so. I'd like to see the unit by unit breakdown of their golf handicaps. Bet those have also gone up since Holtz was fired. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rizman Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 2,376 Content Count: 21,474 Reputation: 940 Days Won: 10 Joined: 01/02/2007 Author Share Posted August 15, 2016 3 hours ago, JTrue said: That was some fantastic Holtz hating if you saw anything in that article about current progress compared to previous. As we get further and further from CSH, I look forward to how we can squeeze in a dig where it's virtually impossible to do so. Impressive leap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayIslandBull Posted August 15, 2016 Group: Member Topic Count: 54 Content Count: 1,141 Reputation: 412 Days Won: 2 Joined: 10/24/2011 Share Posted August 15, 2016 I didn't read anything related to Holtz or his tenure in that article. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now