Jump to content

whiskeyboarder

Member
  • Posts

    470
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by whiskeyboarder

  1. NYC's an awesome place

     

    Been there a handful of times.  Enjoyed it overall, but was never my particular cup of tea.  

     

    The first time I visited D.C., I immediately loved the city.  Ultimately, I ended up living there.  Same thing with southern California.  Just spoke to me.  Never felt the same during my visits to NYC.  Though I can't exactly explain why.  

     

    Though I grew up in North Dakota, snowboarding, snowmobiling, and ice fishing, living on the beach now, I refuse to ever return to a cold weather climate.  

     

    My area of California is so similar to Tampa, but like every detail is similar but of higher quality.  Like the weather.  Just as sunny as Florida, but never with the suffocating humidity.  The Gulf beaches may be generally more beautiful, but ours have much easier accessibility.  I've become convinced that if one is required to live in the continental U.S., has a choice of where and is single and active - well, if that person chooses about anywhere other than southern California, they are doing it wrong. 

     

    West coast best coast. The only east coast state I'd even consider living in anymore is Florida. 90% of my family is back east and I feel this way.

     

     

    Same here.  See above. 

  2.  

    usf doesn't need either at this point in time when football is in effect being downgraded

     

    Agreed. The split between the P5 and Go5 is coming. USF will be fortunate to continue to call Ray Jay home when that happens. The conference and TV money won't be there to build and sustain an IPF or OCS.

     

     

    I'm not prone to pessimism I don't think, yet, this future is what I am beginning to fear will be reality :(

  3. Question, and this seems as convenient and relevant a thread as any to ask it: 

     

    Will the four year guaranteed scholarships change the limit of players that can be on scholarship during individual seasons? 

     

    Let's say hypothetically, that a school grants 25 scholarships one year and none of the athletes pan out on the field, but all remain at the school.  Do they all still count against the total number of scholarship athletes permitted on the roster?  I imagine they would, right? 

  4.  

     

    I mean you guys wanted a ground and pound offense. You got a coach to come in and try to change everything. Now you guys understand we can't run this offense and succeed. I tried saying it from the beginning. He did get us our first 1,000 yard rusher in awhile. You all wanted that. I really don't understand what you guys expected. We were HORRIBLE. We still are. He is not a magician and it doesn't help with a complete overhaul. He has atleast is teaching our kids how to run a real offense. It isn't their fault they are not good enough to execute it and block for it. I would love a coach that would make it all go away and make it easy where big time players would line up to come play. We are unfortunately trying to climb out of a very deep hole. I wouldn't blame tags for this and I knew we wouldn't make any real progress till year 4 or 5. It takes that long. It doesn't take a year or two. Its a process and if you think bringing in a new coach is going to take us from 4-7 wins your foolish. Let's just start all over again with a new coach and learn a new offense and a new defense and make the kids get used to a new coach. Try having a little faith.

    I said the type of coach we should have went after. Kingsbury or whatever his name is at Texas Tech. Air it our and spread it out. Running based off an air assault. That is what we get in florida. That is who we recruit. We should be trying to score 50 and give up 35-40. That's just my opinion.

    Great (rationale) post!
    Except we can also feild a fast defense like Leavitt did and hold teams to 25 points per game and just need 27 to win most.

    The leavitt formula was getting guys who could run fast and jump high, things you can't teach, and teaching them feild position and schemes, and just being able to coach up some fast over looked players, leavitt built something here.

    All we need is a coach that can effectively teach the game, and recruit fast players. FL is overflowing with these fast guys... we were considered one of the fastest defenses in the country under leavitt with mostly 2 star talent. He taught and motivated these guys to be in the right places at the right time and to hit hard.

    We just need the same on offense really, some really fast players, reinforce the fundamentals, keeping the eye on the ball, and an athletic QB.

     

     

    I don't have much of anything substantive to add, but I want to acknowledge how much I agree with this.  Because I do!

  5. Well, clearly, fix the offense.  And our best opportunity to do that, IMO, is to find a stud JUCO QB this off-season, if one exists.  

     

    If we are rolling with White next year, then CWT needs to swallow his pride, spread the guys out a bit and use short plays to get our playmakers in space.  It's almost cliche because it seems the cover-all solution these days, but, if our offense could look as much like Chip Kelly's as it possibly can with the given talent, we'd be on the right track. 

     

    I am not hopeful either of these scenarios come to fruition next year. 

  6. All these CWT sucks posts. Our fan base sucks. Every play that goes against us and you whine. Losing sucks yes. I hate where we are now yes. But temper your expectations. They are unrealistic.

     

    I don't think the commentary here can be extrapolated to the entire fan base. 

     

    I think its the nature of a message board to be a repository of negativity.  It's a convenient place to vent. 

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.