Drewski

Louisville will probably jump them now....but what will happen the week that Florida possibly beats Auburn for the SEC championship assuming these two win out. Does Florida then leapfrog Louisville?

wasn't the iconic U a change from the old symbol?  werent the logos changed to accommodate the new symbol?  

the changes presented are subtle, as are the logo changes (except for the SF).

I do not think it is hard to get the color correct on the helmets...I...just refuse to believe that.  It's a color.  Didnt it used to be green?

I've looked at the white on white again and I've changed my mind back to not liking it.  Too much white for me.  Green pants with the gold stripe would be fine so that way the green on green could also have the gold stripe.  keep in mind that the socks would also be green in that sceme, unlike the ones presented on page 1 here.  I think that is what we do as it is and it looks good.

That way it's always a gold stripe with the gold helmets and the gold CLEATS.  come on, that would be the best uniform in college.  

I think he means that if needed, only subtle changes should be made to the uniforms only. Whereas the logos should be untouchable due everything that has been invested in the current branding of these logos since their inception. I believe he's right about the logos..

I love the thought of new Uni's as I think we're overdue for some.

What I do like:

• The shield is much improved and I absolutely love it on the sleave of the jersey.
  
  
• The helmet is such an obvious improvement that needs to be made even if they decide against new Uni's. I'm still curious what those helmets would look like with an added stripe over the top. I always thought that added a traditional look to college uni's.
  

What I don’t like:

• I absolutely hate the "SF" logo and I feel it should be nowhere near USF athletics. I just think that it screams 'San Francisco.' If I was not from around here and I saw somebody in another city wearing a hat with that logo on it, the last thing I would think would be South Florida. The design itself is nice, but at this point in time we can't pull off something like that without better recognition. I think we shouldn't rush into a concept like this.
  
  
• I'm not sure if I really like the newly improved logos. At first glance they look decent, but from a long term perspective I don’t know if the color adjustments will stand the test of time. I love how the current logos look on T-shirts right now, and I'm not sure I'd love them as much if they displayed those logos above. One thing that I do like about them is that they have been sleekened a little which I think had to do with the size and space usage rather than the color.
  
  
• Socks: I haven't looked at pictures to back me up on this, but I thought that high rise socks were more of an NFL thing. I can't think of a college team that doesn't just show bare leg on this part of the uniform.
  
  
• I like the idea of some kind of stripe down the side....but I think the one that was designed above is too much of a copy cat look. Maybe just a traditional stripe on the pants alone would work. I'll leave that up to the design folks.
  
  
• Don't really like the gold jersey option.  
  

I think this definitely opens up the discussion on better ideas for our uni's but I'd be hesitant to rush into any of these designs. I'd love to see further design concepts. But all in all I love this thread, and great work has been done with this. Go Bulls!

If it were the other way around and we were the ones to start it, our natural reactions would also be to look down upon those who "mimic" it, whether it was right or wrong.

People will look for any excuse to take shots at their rivals, the same way we do for our rivals. If it's not the bulls sign, it would be something else....no big deal.

anybody know why sportsline is listing us at 2-2??

http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/scoreboard