Jump to content

sdgukhsdgl

Member
  • Posts

    3,078
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by sdgukhsdgl

  1. More like $2M Rizzo, You only get $4.3M for the 2nd BCS team.

    After reading what some are saying today in order for the NE to get 2 in the BCS we're going to need UF to win the SEC (Taking the Sugar Bowl spot), Oklahoma to lose to Oklahoma State, or Boise St to lose to Nevada.

    The Orange Bowl has said they will probably take UF as an at large if they beat FSU and lose in the SEC title game. This is directly related to the fact that they are worried that the ACC team GT/Wake/Maryland will not be bringing the crowd they want.

    The Rose has already talked to Oklahoma according to some reports, and will probably be looking their way if USC wins out, to set up a Michigan/Oklahoma Rose Bowl.

    The most common I've seen today scenrio today this this.

    NC - OSU v. USC

    Rose - Michigan v. Oklahoma

    Sugar - Florida v. Notre Dame

    Orange - Louisville v. Georgia Tech

    Fiesta - Texas v. Boise State

    There still is a lot of football left, and Nevada is no push over for Boise, as are FSU for UF and OK State for Oklahoma.

    if two Big 12 teams make it in the BCS it is a load of crap.  The BIg 12 is arguably the worst BCS conference this year.  The Oregon game should not have been close if Oklahoma was a BCS worthy team as shown by Oregon's performance lately against decent opponents.  Heck, Oregon got WAXED by Arizona, Cal, and USC... not exactly a stellar team.    

  2. Bull94, you really are making this too easy...

    Ainge is credited with playing 10 games.  He took MAYBE 5 snaps against LSU before sitting due to an injury.  Compute his total offense numbers using 9 games, much more accurate, and he is in the top 10 range with around 270 yds/gm.  Same goes for total passing, use 9 games and he is in the 20-21 completions/gm range which puts him around the top 10 again.  

    Maybe they are getting better with the Freshman?? Or maybe you are retarded and don't realize the numbers dropped after the freshman played...

    take your pick

  3. Not to mention the UF seconday hasnt seen a WR tandem like Manningham and Breason Yet, mix that in with Mike Hart and i think you have a blow out.  

    Tennessee's trio of Robert Meachem, Jayson Swain, and Bret Smith would disagree...    UT had a top 10, maybe even top 5 passing offense before Ainge got hurt.  

    actually ainge ranked 22nd total offense in the country and 20th for passing per game.

    I guess he'd be considered top 5 in the country like LSU?? The team that needed OT to beat Ole Miss at home. How they still get all this respect is beyond me.

    Just another example of the mediocre SEC. At least UF got another quality OOC win at home!

    By the way Kentucky's qb ranks higher than ainge in both categories.

    huh?  http://web1.ncaa.org/d1mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2006&div=4&rpt=IA_teampass&site=org

    UT is #12 passing offense, that is with a backup RS Freshman playing almost all of the game against LSU and the whole game against Arkansas.  And Ainge's per game numbers are flawed because it counts him as playing against LSU when he MAYBE took 5 snaps in that game but it counts against him.  

    Bull94 as much as I enjoy you trying to rip on the SEC, it is really getting old because you really sound dumb doing it, please move on to something else.  

  4. It's hard to say they are the best two teams in the country when they are playing against each other.  Kind of like how everyone uses the argument against the SEC, it is hard to claim superiority when you play against yourselves (conference teams).  OSU's only win is against Texas, who lost to Kansas St. and had a freshman QB facing OSU early in the season.  Michigan has wins over Wisconsin (only 2 wins over teams with a winning record) and Notre Dame (ill reserve complete judgment on them until after the USC game).  

    They may be the best two teams, but it is hard to say that without seeing them play a USC, Ark., or UF.  

  5. ok, the SEC East point is ridiculous.  Yea, UT is .500 right now, but that makes them 3-3.  Losses to LSU, Arkansas, and Florida, all teams in the BCS top 10.  The only reason UK is ahead of UT right now is because they got luck on the schedule and drew Ole Miss and Miss. St. as 2 of their 3 SEC West opponents AND UK still has to play UT.  

    Have you seen Arkansas play? They deserve to be one of the top 1 loss teams.

    Have you seen LSU play? When they pull their heads out of thier asses long enough to play, they are one of the top 5 teams in the country.   What 2 loss team would you rank ahead of them? Texas? they just lost to K. State.  Cal? They just lost to Arizona.  

    Are you really trying to know Tennessee for losing to UF, Arkansas, and LSU? Teams with a combined record of 26-4, all ranked in the BCS top 10.  Who would you rank ahead of them? Nebraska probably has the best case, but they lost to Oklahoma St.  Clemson might have a case, but losses to Maryland, VT, and BC are no better than UT's losses.  Oregon has losses to Cal, USC, and WSU.  

  6. The SEC does have more overall good teams, they also have more overall bad teams.

    If the SEC only had 8 teams or the BE expanded to 12, this wouldn't even be close

    still, Ole Miss, Miss. St., Vandy, UK are actually comparable to UCONN, Syracuse, and pick two of Cincy/Pitt/USF

  7. You do know LSU is top 10 in the nation in scoring offense right?

    gosh, i hate when facts get in the way of such a great argument...

    As for UK being in second place in the east, they still have to play Tennessee.  And they got EXTREMELY lucky on their scheduling on the games they have to play against the SEC West.  UK played Ole Miss, LSU, and Miss. St.  UT had to play Arkansas, Bama, and LSU.  Not exactly comparable.  UK has lost to almost every decent team from the SEC they played (UF, LSU, USC) and somehow beat UGA.  So saying they are in second now, hardly means anything ... and standings, outside of first place, mean nothing.    

    Did you really just try to compare the gauntlet of UL, WVU, RU, Pitt, and USF to say UF, Bama, Arkansas, Auburn, UT?  At best, the top 3 are a wash, then I would think the leftover of UT/Auburn and Bama are better than USF/Pitt.  

  8. To say RU could never beat Ohio State is not a stretch. RU could most certainly hang with any team in America.

    However, I have to question the belief of RU right now being a better team than Ohio State. OSU is a very good team that outside of the Illinois game has rolled everyone they've played. OSU is clearly the best team in the country. (Still RU coul beat them, but I wouldn't put money on it)

    well yea, USF could beat OSU too, but I am not going to say USF is a better team.  There are a lot of teams that could pull off a one game upset in a regular season game, but to the chance decreases exponentially when they are playing in a NC game.  A Jim Tressel coached team is not going to play down to their opponent or have a let down game in a NC environment.  

  9. does anybody that has watched football this year think that Rutgers is better than Ohio State? honestly...

    Almost all of the top teams this year would be able to contain the Rutgers running game, do you really think Mike freakin Teel would be able to pick apart Michigan, OSU, UF, etc?

    All I do is watch college football on saturdays, sunday nights, tuesdays, wednesdays, thurs, and fridays....  I'm a stat junkie online.  (This stuff doesn't matter, but I watch college football)

    I think Rutgers is a better team than Ohio State!!!  There someone said it now stop saying that OSU is clearly better than RU!

    you've lost your **** mind

    I give up trying to discuss anything logical outside of the Big East or USF on this board, it is a waste of time

  10. does anybody that has watched football this year think that Rutgers is better than Ohio State? honestly...

    Almost all of the top teams this year would be able to contain the Rutgers running game, do you really think Mike freakin Teel would be able to pick apart Michigan, OSU, UF, etc?

    I hate SEC fans.

    But seriously, yes, Rutgers can compete with the best in the nation.  WVU can compete with the best in the nation.  UL can compete with the best in the nation.  Just because you are ranked all season does not mean you are that much better than everyone else.  Oh yeah, 3 big east teams are in the top 10 too, go figure.  Those teams you mentioned have all had bad games and UF in particular has played poorly many games (and lost to a team that couldn't score an offensive TD and then got blown out by Georgia who last time I checked has lost many games this year against bad teams).

    No one can contain Ray Rice that well.

    You hate SEC fans because they know better than to buy into all the hype? It's not just the SEC, anybody that has watched football knows that Rutgers would probably lose by 10-20 points against the top teams this year.  

    Are you kidding, no one can contain Ray Rice that well? UL's mediocre defense gave up like 120 to Rice.  UL is the #50 overall defense and #26 rush defense.  Michigan is the #3 overall and #1 against the run, giving up under THIRTY yards a game.  I like their chances, not to metnion OSU, UF, USC, LSU ... all top 20 defenses.    

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.