Jump to content

Raetus

Member
  • Posts

    1,037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Posts posted by Raetus

  1. I know it's a crap shoot, but I wonder if we'd be willing to take a big boy step forward and hire Davis as HC with Taggart as a top coordinator/recruiting specialist. Sure, it would cost us a lot of money and I'm not saying Taggart would go for it, but it would make for a nice coach-in-waiting situation if all parties were amicable toward the idea.

    Again... crap shoot... I fully understand this.

  2. I would hope they let him. no sense leaving on bad terms. they can't fault him for taking another job. personally i don't see what's wrong with letting them coach their bowl games before leaving. i get they need to set up staff and contact recruits but just delegate both at the new place and old. let guys help run practices and set up shop.

    I agree with you; honestly, I have no problem with him doing both jobs until WKU finishes their bowl game. I've continued to work for previous employers for months after I already transitioned into a hire paying job just to ease the transition. Heck, I've done it at no cost to the former employer, as well, just to maintain good terms. There's no way that he can't work on recruiting and staffing while still preparing a bunch of teenagers to throw/run a ball around a field. Leave some staff there to run practices, fly to tampa and do what you need to do and fly back to WKU when you need to do it. With the money that is involved in something like this, a few extra plane trips should be no problem.

  3. would give him the job in less than a heartbeat. Easily worth the risk and rebuilding period with sanctions.

    Would it still be worth it to you if it meant possible probation for a minor violation? I like the guy and think he should be able to coach again. I think he should be able to coach again right now, in fact. NCAA, though, has stupid rules and has placed some of them against him for lying to them. He could inadvertently do something wrong and NCAA might come down hard against him and the school -- especially as they grow more and more power hungry with their penalties. Wait until they are finished with their witch hunt in Miami (telling former players they must meet with NCAA officials or they will be considered guilty? come on?) ... they'll be in full on power trip mode, then.

  4. Tressel has a show cause penalty, not a show clause and it's a far bigger pain than it's being made out to be. It requires semi-annual reports from the coach and the institute and an acceptance of penalties that will be given to the school for just hiring the coach. The penalties can be appealed by appearing in front of a NCAA committee and presenting a case, but it's definitely not a sure thing and you have to have a legitimate reason. If the coach commits an additional penalty during his stay with the school, the school can be hit with severe penalties.

    It's not worth it.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.