vm7118
-
Posts
30 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
News
Videos YouTube
SuperQuote
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by vm7118
-
-
Last attempt, Rutgers v. USF is not the topic. It's whether Rutgers, "belongs" in the Big Ten, as per your original statement. Rutgers has shown competition-wise that they are not even an average Big Ten team and what makes it worse, the Big Ten is the worst P5 conference top to bottom.
I have no bias towards or against Rutgers.
http://www.bigten.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/m-footbl-standings.html
RU is "not even an average" team, and yet squarely in the middle of the more difficult division. With a head to head win over the team right above them. In the first year in the conference. Losses: OSU, MSU, Wisconsin, Nebraska, PSU. The PSU loss is really the only blemish on the season, and RU led that game for 58+ minutes.
-
Yeah, Rutgers is amazing!! Pulling off close wins over talented teams like Arkansas, USF, Tulane, and Syracuse. I'm surprised they aren't ranked #1.
Yeah, that Arkansas win was something else, mad props to beating Petrino and Tyler Wilson ...
oh, wait ...
actually, wilson played, and played like the NFL talent he is. and paul petrino is their OC. so thanks, we accept the props.
rutgers continues to show the world they belong
in Tampa Bay and General Sports
Posted · Edited by vm7118
Right. RU finishes squarely in the middle of the B1G east (more difficult division) in their first year, with a head to head win over the team right above them, and you think they *don't* belong. 5 losses, 4 of them to top 25 teams. 3 of them to top 10 teams. Smazza is not the one lacking in logic here. .......by far