Best OOC winning % by Conference

[TyBull]

Best OOC winning % by Conference

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Congrats to the SEC and Big East Conference.

Both conferences had a remarkable 82% winning In

Out of Conference Football games for the 2006 season.

CONF-----WINS---LOSES----%

________|_____|_______|_____

BIGEAST--37-----8-------82%

SEC------46-----10------82%

BIG10----35-----16------69%

PAC10----25-----12------68%

BIG12----35-----20------64%

ACC------32-----22------59%

WAC------21-----20------51%

Mwest----19-----21------48%

IND------19-----22------46%

USA------21-----32------40%

MAC------15-----37------29%

[Mama_Bull]

Nice.  Let's hope this year it is even better.

[Jihme]

very nice...  let's hope for less losses next year

[crambone]

wewt wewt

[outrunner]

adds to the USF-Auburn game

[twillybull]

Hmm,  isn't it interesting that the SEC played the WEAKEST OOC strenght of schedule out of all the BCS leagues and they didn't fare any better than the Big East.  I think that speaks volumes of the level of play going on now in the Big East.  

[JoeB]

It looks great on paper, but the Big East played alot of weak schools.  Take us for example from last year.  Our out of conference wins were against McNeese State, FIU, UCF, and North Carolina.  Combined they went something like 13-35 (guessing McNeese went 6-6 at the 1AA level).  Also add in our win against a weak ECU team and its not a great statement.  We basically beat the teams that were on our schedule which is what you have to do.  

If you look at the rest of the Big East collectively, there aren't too many big victories either.  Biggest that comes to mind was Louisville thumping Miami (which had a down year).

Nice stat and all but not really that staggering.

[Knight_Light]

It looks great on paper, but the Big East played alot of weak schools.  Take us for example from last year.  Our out of conference wins were against McNeese State, FIU, UCF, and North Carolina.  Combined they went something like 13-35 (guessing McNeese went 6-6 at the 1AA level).  Also add in our win against a weak ECU team and its not a great statement.  We basically beat the teams that were on our schedule which is what you have to do.  

If you look at the rest of the Big East collectively, there aren't too many big victories either.  Biggest that comes to mind was Louisville thumping Miami (which had a down year).

Nice stat and all but not really that staggering.

True.

As most know, each Big East Team has to fill FIVE non-conf dates on their schedule...while all the other conferences except the Pac-10 have to fill 4. (FYI...Pac-10 plays NINE conf games now...and only need 3 non-conf game dates).

Believe the Big East only beat 1, maybe 2 ranked non-conf opponent during the regular season out of those 40 games...and one of them was Miami earlier in the reason...before they dropped from the polls.

With 5 non-conf games to schedule...Big East teams sometimes have to schedule someone/anyone to fill a date.

At least USF is doing their part next year with a tough game at Auburn.

One Big East Newspaper already wrote an article about how next year's Big East non-conf schedule isn't much better:

--------------------------------

http://www.dailymail.com/news/Sports/2006120616/

Schedule thud in 2007 not good for Big East football

Jack Bogaczyk

Daily Mail Sports Editor

Wednesday December 06, 2006  

 

The Big East Conference has three football teams with at least 10 victories for the first time. The league is favored to win all five of its 2006 bowl games, four of those by at least a touchdown.

The conference, emerging from a loss of power teams in 2004 and ‘05, enjoyed a league record 21 home-game network TV appearances (ABC, ESPN, ESPN2). The Big East had two of the top three and three of the top eight games in the ESPN college football ratings this season.

So, how will the Big East follow up such an impact, profile-altering, historic season?

It will do it with a scheduling thud.

On the eight Big East non-conference team schedules for the 2007 season, there is only one game against a team that is currently ranked in the Associated Press poll.  

South Florida plays at Auburn. The Big East will play 40 non-conference games and 39 are scheduled. Louisville still is in need of a home game.  

Of the 39 scheduled games (see accompanying chart), the Big East has only 14 against Bowl Championship Series conference schools -- and only four of those against BCS teams with winning records in 2006 (West Virginia-Maryland, USF-Auburn, Maryland-Rutgers and Louisville-Kentucky).

On a recent conference call with Big East media and coaches, Commissioner Mike Tranghese mentioned potshots at Big East schedules (the league was 1-3 against AP-ranked outsiders this season).

"Every time you hear a piece of criticism, just stop and look ... everybody has an agenda," Tranghese said. "That's what the BCS has done. The BCS has driven coaches to complain about other programs and other coaches. I just don't think that's a healthy thing. I think people ought to worry about themselves.  

"I think if you're undefeated in this league, you're going to have as good of a chance as anybody else of playing in the championship game. I hear people talking about non-conference schedules. People ought to take a look in the mirror and look at their non-conference schedules as well."

The Big East looked in the mirror on Monday at the conference's athletic directors meeting in New York.

"There's no question that non-conference scheduling is something we talked about for subsequent years," said Nick Carparelli, the Big East associate commissioner for football operations. "It's up to the individual institutions to schedule; all we can do is advise and encourage them.

"We continue to emphasize the importance of getting quality in the non-conference schedules. It's important for several reasons, especially television."

Carparelli said he wasn't going to comment on other conferences' non-league schedules, but said he does feel that "on average" the Big East teams' non-league schedules are no weaker than other BCS leagues.

However, the Big East is trying to rebuild its stature since the exit of Miami (Fla.), Virginia Tech and Boston College to the ACC. Tranghese has said, repeatedly, in the past that the best thing the Big East can do "is schedule games and win our share of them."

The Big East also has more non-conference games that can make an impact, because as the smallest BCS conference (eight teams), only seven league games are scheduled.

"There's no question it's a down year (2007)," Carparelli said.

West Virginia plays two out-of-conference games against BCS opponents next season -- home against Mississippi State and at Maryland. Cincinnati, which played toughies at Ohio State and Virginia Tech this season, has no BCS league teams on the 2007 schedule.

Syracuse, with three, has the most BCS non-league opponents. Rutgers, coming off a 10-2 regular season and Texas Bowl date against Kansas State (7-5), has only one non-league road game, against weak Army. The four home foes are Navy, Maryland, Buffalo and Division I-AA Norfolk State.

Here's another reason the Big East programs should want to play BCS non-conference foes. The Big East pays its schools $101,694 per network TV appearance in road games -- but only for visiting a BCS school.

So, WVU had an ESPN2 game at East Carolina, but no check. Only one Big East road date with a BCS foe got onto ABC, ESPN or ESPN2 in 2006 -- Rutgers' opening win at North Carolina.

Beginning in 2008, Carparelli said the future of the Big East teams' non-conference scheduling is more to the league office's liking. That includes WVU's home-and-home series with Maryland, Auburn, Michigan State and Florida State between 2008-13.

Pitt has an eight-game series through 2015 with Notre Dame, which also plays Rutgers annually starting in 2010. The Panthers meet Miami (Fla.), Virginia Tech and Clemson. Syracuse has Penn State, BC and Virginia Tech. Louisville faces Georgia and Georgia Tech.

Cincinnati has home dates with N.C. State, the Buckeyes and Hokies. South Florida plays Michigan State, Miami and North Carolina. Connecticut meets Iowa, N.C. State and Virginia.

"What we've asked the schools to do is play two quality BCS schools a year -- one home and one road," Carparelli said. "I can tell you that some of our schools, like West Virginia and Louisville, for example, want to play people, but not many teams are willing to come to Morgantown or Louisville to play because they might get beat.

"We're a BCS conference. Our teams aren't going on the road and not get home dates in return."

No one expects that, but much of the positive the Big East gained in 2006 could be drained as teams play non-BCS opponents. That will diminish telecast opportunities and could become an issue in the strength of schedule factor in the BCS computer ratings.

[Triple B]

It looks great on paper, but the Big East played alot of weak schools.  Take us for example from last year.  Our out of conference wins were against McNeese State, FIU, UCF, and North Carolina.  Combined they went something like 13-35 (guessing McNeese went 6-6 at the 1AA level).  Also add in our win against a weak ECU team and its not a great statement.  We basically beat the teams that were on our schedule which is what you have to do.  

If you look at the rest of the Big East collectively, there aren't too many big victories either.  Biggest that comes to mind was Louisville thumping Miami (which had a down year).

Nice stat and all but not really that staggering.

True.

As most know, each Big East Team has to fill FIVE non-conf dates on their schedule...while all the other conferences except the Pac-10 have to fill 4. (FYI...Pac-10 plays NINE conf games now...and only need 3 non-conf game dates).

Believe the Big East only beat 1, maybe 2 ranked non-conf opponent during the regular season out of those 40 games...and one of them was Miami earlier in the reason...before they dropped from the polls.

With 5 non-conf games to schedule...Big East teams sometimes have to schedule someone/anyone to fill a date.

At least USF is doing their part next year with a tough game at Auburn.

One Big East Newspaper already wrote an article about how next year's Big East non-conf schedule isn't much better:

--------------------------------

http://www.dailymail.com/news/Sports/2006120616/

Schedule thud in 2007 not good for Big East football

Jack Bogaczyk

Daily Mail Sports Editor

Wednesday December 06, 2006  

 

The Big East Conference has three football teams with at least 10 victories for the first time. The league is favored to win all five of its 2006 bowl games, four of those by at least a touchdown.

The conference, emerging from a loss of power teams in 2004 and ‘05, enjoyed a league record 21 home-game network TV appearances (ABC, ESPN, ESPN2). The Big East had two of the top three and three of the top eight games in the ESPN college football ratings this season.

So, how will the Big East follow up such an impact, profile-altering, historic season?

It will do it with a scheduling thud.

On the eight Big East non-conference team schedules for the 2007 season, there is only one game against a team that is currently ranked in the Associated Press poll.  

South Florida plays at Auburn. The Big East will play 40 non-conference games and 39 are scheduled. Louisville still is in need of a home game.  

Of the 39 scheduled games (see accompanying chart), the Big East has only 14 against Bowl Championship Series conference schools -- and only four of those against BCS teams with winning records in 2006 (West Virginia-Maryland, USF-Auburn, Maryland-Rutgers and Louisville-Kentucky).

On a recent conference call with Big East media and coaches, Commissioner Mike Tranghese mentioned potshots at Big East schedules (the league was 1-3 against AP-ranked outsiders this season).

"Every time you hear a piece of criticism, just stop and look ... everybody has an agenda," Tranghese said. "That's what the BCS has done. The BCS has driven coaches to complain about other programs and other coaches. I just don't think that's a healthy thing. I think people ought to worry about themselves.  

"I think if you're undefeated in this league, you're going to have as good of a chance as anybody else of playing in the championship game. I hear people talking about non-conference schedules. People ought to take a look in the mirror and look at their non-conference schedules as well."

The Big East looked in the mirror on Monday at the conference's athletic directors meeting in New York.

"There's no question that non-conference scheduling is something we talked about for subsequent years," said Nick Carparelli, the Big East associate commissioner for football operations. "It's up to the individual institutions to schedule; all we can do is advise and encourage them.

"We continue to emphasize the importance of getting quality in the non-conference schedules. It's important for several reasons, especially television."

Carparelli said he wasn't going to comment on other conferences' non-league schedules, but said he does feel that "on average" the Big East teams' non-league schedules are no weaker than other BCS leagues.

However, the Big East is trying to rebuild its stature since the exit of Miami (Fla.), Virginia Tech and Boston College to the ACC. Tranghese has said, repeatedly, in the past that the best thing the Big East can do "is schedule games and win our share of them."

The Big East also has more non-conference games that can make an impact, because as the smallest BCS conference (eight teams), only seven league games are scheduled.

"There's no question it's a down year (2007)," Carparelli said.

West Virginia plays two out-of-conference games against BCS opponents next season -- home against Mississippi State and at Maryland. Cincinnati, which played toughies at Ohio State and Virginia Tech this season, has no BCS league teams on the 2007 schedule.

Syracuse, with three, has the most BCS non-league opponents. Rutgers, coming off a 10-2 regular season and Texas Bowl date against Kansas State (7-5), has only one non-league road game, against weak Army. The four home foes are Navy, Maryland, Buffalo and Division I-AA Norfolk State.

Here's another reason the Big East programs should want to play BCS non-conference foes. The Big East pays its schools $101,694 per network TV appearance in road games -- but only for visiting a BCS school.

So, WVU had an ESPN2 game at East Carolina, but no check. Only one Big East road date with a BCS foe got onto ABC, ESPN or ESPN2 in 2006 -- Rutgers' opening win at North Carolina.

Beginning in 2008, Carparelli said the future of the Big East teams' non-conference scheduling is more to the league office's liking. That includes WVU's home-and-home series with Maryland, Auburn, Michigan State and Florida State between 2008-13.

Pitt has an eight-game series through 2015 with Notre Dame, which also plays Rutgers annually starting in 2010. The Panthers meet Miami (Fla.), Virginia Tech and Clemson. Syracuse has Penn State, BC and Virginia Tech. Louisville faces Georgia and Georgia Tech.

Cincinnati has home dates with N.C. State, the Buckeyes and Hokies. South Florida plays Michigan State, Miami and North Carolina. Connecticut meets Iowa, N.C. State and Virginia.

"What we've asked the schools to do is play two quality BCS schools a year -- one home and one road," Carparelli said. "I can tell you that some of our schools, like West Virginia and Louisville, for example, want to play people, but not many teams are willing to come to Morgantown or Louisville to play because they might get beat.

"We're a BCS conference. Our teams aren't going on the road and not get home dates in return."

No one expects that, but much of the positive the Big East gained in 2006 could be drained as teams play non-BCS opponents. That will diminish telecast opportunities and could become an issue in the strength of schedule factor in the BCS computer ratings.

[smiley=loser.gif]

[USFan]

Hey K_L, don't worry.  This will be the last year you post about the weak OOC games that the BE has.

Beginning in 2008, Carparelli said the future of the Big East teams' non-conference scheduling is more to the league office's liking. That includes WVU's home-and-home series with Maryland, Auburn, Michigan State and Florida State between 2008-13.  

 

Pitt has an eight-game series through 2015 with Notre Dame, which also plays Rutgers annually starting in 2010. The Panthers meet Miami (Fla.), Virginia Tech and Clemson. Syracuse has Penn State, BC and Virginia Tech. Louisville faces Georgia and Georgia Tech.  

 

Cincinnati has home dates with N.C. State, the Buckeyes and Hokies. South Florida plays Michigan State, Miami and North Carolina. Connecticut meets Iowa, N.C. State and Virginia.  

What a  [smiley=loser.gif]