rutgers continues to show the world they belong

[smazza]

 

the bias against rutgers here is laughable

The football history between the two schools, their putting up recruiting billboards in Tampa, their raving lunatic ex-coach having imploded as the Bucs coach, their smack-talking fans, and phantom forward pass calls, etc., created a "bad blood" situation against RU giving most Bulls fans a reason to hate. Your infatuation with fluffing their program at every opportunity, despite USF apparently being your alma mater, is ludicrous.

 

 

 

rutgers does it again and is heading to a bowl game

 

eat your sour grapes

 

sometimes i think usf fans with their petty jealousies are getting what they deserve 

[smazza]

 

with the big boys

 

wow has their program progressed

 

they even sold out first big ten home game

 

Michigan St - 45

Rutgers - 3

 

 

Rutgers: 6-5.  2-5 in conference

Two conference wins are:

Indiana (3-8)

Michigan (5-5. Worst program in many years causing their AD to resign)

 

 

3 big ten conference wins

 

tell me you wouldnt want to change places with them?

 

have one honest moment

[Apis Bull]

Wanting to change places with them and them, "belonging" are two different things.  I don't know why I bother though, you can see logic through your biases. 

[smazza]

Wanting to change places with them and them, "belonging" are two different things.  I don't know why I bother though, you can see logic through your biases. 

 

 

you have the bias my fellow board member

 

rutgers had a better program than usf before we were conference mates,while we were conference mates and certainly now

 

usf was always looking up to rutgers

[Apis Bull]

Last attempt, Rutgers v. USF is not the topic.  It's whether Rutgers, "belongs" in the Big Ten, as per your original statement.  Rutgers has shown competition-wise that they are not even an average Big Ten team and what makes it worse, the Big Ten is the worst P5 conference top to bottom.

 

I have no bias towards or against Rutgers.

[vm7118]

Last attempt, Rutgers v. USF is not the topic.  It's whether Rutgers, "belongs" in the Big Ten, as per your original statement.  Rutgers has shown competition-wise that they are not even an average Big Ten team and what makes it worse, the Big Ten is the worst P5 conference top to bottom.

 

I have no bias towards or against Rutgers.

http://www.bigten.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/m-footbl-standings.html

 

RU is "not even an average" team, and yet squarely in the middle of the more difficult division. With a head to head win over the team right above them. In the first year in the conference. Losses: OSU, MSU, Wisconsin, Nebraska, PSU. The PSU loss is really the only blemish on the season, and RU led that game for 58+ minutes.

[bulls phanatic]

Not a bad year for Rutgers

[Dogma]

Last attempt, Rutgers v. USF is not the topic.  It's whether Rutgers, "belongs" in the Big Ten, as per your original statement.  Rutgers has shown competition-wise that they are not even an average Big Ten team and what makes it worse, the Big Ten is the worst P5 conference top to bottom.

 

I have no bias towards or against Rutgers.

 

Logic is not one of Smazza's strengths... by far

[vm7118]

 

Last attempt, Rutgers v. USF is not the topic.  It's whether Rutgers, "belongs" in the Big Ten, as per your original statement.  Rutgers has shown competition-wise that they are not even an average Big Ten team and what makes it worse, the Big Ten is the worst P5 conference top to bottom.

 

I have no bias towards or against Rutgers.

 

Logic is not one of Smazza's strengths... by far

 

Right. RU finishes squarely in the middle of the B1G east (more difficult division) in their first year, with a head to head win over the team right above them, and you think they *don't* belong. 5 losses, 4 of them to top 25 teams. 3 of them to top 10 teams. Smazza is not the one lacking in logic here. .......by far

Edited December 2, 2014 by vm7118

[smazza]

rutgers closes strong

 

very impressive first year in the big ten