Option #2 is still alive

[Flowers4Heisman]

I didn't think USF would go out and grab somebody's (D-1 school) coach. Otherwise, why would they take the long route via hiring an agency?

 

I think our best hope is in USF making a decision to hire a winning coach from a small school -hopefully one that's still in the tournament.

 

If they go with option #3, hiring somebody's unproven assistant, my complaint will be this: you fired Stan Heath burned over a million dollars to make this hire?

[JTrue]

I didn't think USF would go out and grab somebody's (D-1 school) coach. Otherwise, why would they take the long route via hiring an agency?

I think our best hope is in USF making a decision to hire a winning coach from a small school -hopefully one that's still in the tournament.

If they go with option #3, hiring somebody's unproven assistant, my complaint will be this: you fired Stan Heath burned over a million dollars to make this hire?

Agreed on all points. The minute we hired a search firm, big money and big names were out. If it's option 3 and not 2, we're the shittiest athletic department ever. Edited March 21, 2014 by JTrue

[Skingraft]

#2 is always alive in my home

[Triple B]

I didn't think USF would go out and grab somebody's (D-1 school) coach. Otherwise, why would they take the long route via hiring an agency?

 

I think our best hope is in USF making a decision to hire a winning coach from a small school -hopefully one that's still in the tournament.

 

 

 

I'm a bit confused ....Aren't all schools in the tournament D-1?

[JTrue]

 

I didn't think USF would go out and grab somebody's (D-1 school) coach. Otherwise, why would they take the long route via hiring an agency?

 

I think our best hope is in USF making a decision to hire a winning coach from a small school -hopefully one that's still in the tournament.

 

 

 

I'm a bit confused ....Aren't all schools in the tournament D-1?

 

There's no 1-A for basketball. So, yes.