AND PEOPLE SAY WE HAVE GREEN AND GOLD GOGGLES?!?!?!

[Hem]

LOL at this thread. Hometown paper backs the hometown team...shocker.

Who cares who recruited better?

UCiF did pretty well this year with trash recruiting rankings they had in the past.

USF better show we can do well with the new talent we are bringing in.

[charsibb]

I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that there's another pissing contest in the pen.

 

[Who'sYourData?]

No shocker. The Cracker is the only soul who can decipher Data's Gibberish.

 

 

It appears you can't decipher anyone else's gibberish either.

[Goldenbuc]

The number of signees is factored into the recruiting website rankings. UCF was limited from the NCAA sanctions, this year. So, I think the O-Sentinel was ranking UCF higher based on what they were able do, despite the sanctions.

[Who'sYourData?]

Please.  The O-Slantinel was trying to keep it's few paying customers happy.

[Paisa el Toro]

The number of signees is factored into the recruiting website rankings. UCF was limited from the NCAA sanctions, this year. So, I think the O-Sentinel was ranking UCF higher based on what they were able do, despite the sanctions.

 

Ha!

[TExpress]

The number of signees is factored into the recruiting website rankings. UCF was limited from the NCAA sanctions, this year. So, I think the O-Sentinel was ranking UCF higher based on what they were able do, despite the sanctions.

 

Ummmmm okay.... Even if UCF signed 28 players, USF would still be way ahead of UCF as the recruit ratings carry a lot more weight than the number of recruits signed. The author of this article needs to be drug tested if he truly believes what he wrote.

 

Source: Common Sense and every recruiting source know to man that isn't Orlando based/biased....