Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

3 USF Players In Top 250 Prospects For 2010 NFL Draft


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  7,993
  • Reputation:   968
  • Days Won:  21
  • Joined:  10/31/2005

The NFL is not the place to work out any work-ethic issues. 

As for agreeing with smazza, he says in one post that Ford won't amount to anything and in another that the staff doesn't know how to use him.  One shot at the player and one at the staff but nothing about Mike's work ethic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  219
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/04/2009

ford will be a better pro than college player

says something about our great coaching staff

Michael Jordan was a better pro than college player so I guess by your logic that Dean Smith couldn't coach.   Why don't you do all of us a favor and stick to the Southern Cal boards.

Umm, nice job putting words in his mouth.

Both the Jordan and Fred Taylor rebuttals are awful.

The idea here is that a mediocre college player may end up being a good NFL player. IF that becomes the case then it is a problem of the coaching staff. Jordan was great in college and got even better in college. However, you won't see...oh..."Toast" Roberts doing well in the NFL after his mediocre stint here.

That said, I'm guessing Ford will either have a solid season or two here and be productive in the NFL or he'll be  a dud here and not make a roster in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  3,403
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/27/2005

ford will be a better pro than college player

says something about our great coaching staff

Michael Jordan was a better pro than college player so I guess by your logic that Dean Smith couldn't coach.  Why don't you do all of us a favor and stick to the Southern Cal boards.

Umm, nice job putting words in his mouth.

Both the Jordan and Fred Taylor rebuttals are awful.

The idea here is that a mediocre college player may end up being a good NFL player. IF that becomes the case then it is a problem of the coaching staff. Jordan was great in college and got even better in college. However, you won't see...oh..."Toast" Roberts doing well in the NFL after his mediocre stint here.

That said, I'm guessing Ford will either have a solid season or two here and be productive in the NFL or he'll be  a dud here and not make a roster in the NFL.

So you're going out on a limb and saying he'll either succeed or fail?  Nice...

as for smazza, as already pointed out, he said in another thread that Ford won't amount to anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  96,972
  • Reputation:   10,800
  • Days Won:  469
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

ford will be a better pro than college player

says something about our great coaching staff

Re: Mike Ford on the radar   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

you guys are still talking about him

forget it

he hasnt produced yet he aint producing next year

http://thebullspen.com/index.php?topic=60121.0;all

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So which is it? 

LOL.  But he'll be the first to say whatever it is someone else says about Ford at a later date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  219
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/04/2009

So you're going out on a limb and saying he'll either succeed or fail?  Nice...

as for smazza, as already pointed out, he said in another thread that Ford won't amount to anything.

I agree smazza is all over the place. That's who he is lol.

Regardless, my statement while obvious makes sense in the context here. Smazza said he'd be nothing here and would excel in the pros (more or less). Thus, he gave the picture of inverse association. I simply noted that however he does here is what he'll also do in the pros. Contrary to smazza's statement.

Thanks for trying to rip me though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.