SANJAY Posted April 17, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 7,993 Reputation: 968 Days Won: 21 Joined: 10/31/2005 Share Posted April 17, 2009 The NFL is not the place to work out any work-ethic issues. As for agreeing with smazza, he says in one post that Ford won't amount to anything and in another that the staff doesn't know how to use him. One shot at the player and one at the staff but nothing about Mike's work ethic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The New "U" Posted April 17, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 219 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/04/2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 ford will be a better pro than college playersays something about our great coaching staffMichael Jordan was a better pro than college player so I guess by your logic that Dean Smith couldn't coach. Why don't you do all of us a favor and stick to the Southern Cal boards.Umm, nice job putting words in his mouth.Both the Jordan and Fred Taylor rebuttals are awful.The idea here is that a mediocre college player may end up being a good NFL player. IF that becomes the case then it is a problem of the coaching staff. Jordan was great in college and got even better in college. However, you won't see...oh..."Toast" Roberts doing well in the NFL after his mediocre stint here.That said, I'm guessing Ford will either have a solid season or two here and be productive in the NFL or he'll be a dud here and not make a roster in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windbane Posted April 17, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,403 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/27/2005 Share Posted April 17, 2009 ford will be a better pro than college playersays something about our great coaching staffMichael Jordan was a better pro than college player so I guess by your logic that Dean Smith couldn't coach. Why don't you do all of us a favor and stick to the Southern Cal boards.Umm, nice job putting words in his mouth.Both the Jordan and Fred Taylor rebuttals are awful.The idea here is that a mediocre college player may end up being a good NFL player. IF that becomes the case then it is a problem of the coaching staff. Jordan was great in college and got even better in college. However, you won't see...oh..."Toast" Roberts doing well in the NFL after his mediocre stint here.That said, I'm guessing Ford will either have a solid season or two here and be productive in the NFL or he'll be a dud here and not make a roster in the NFL. So you're going out on a limb and saying he'll either succeed or fail? Nice...as for smazza, as already pointed out, he said in another thread that Ford won't amount to anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted April 17, 2009 Group: Admin Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 96,972 Reputation: 10,800 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted April 17, 2009 ford will be a better pro than college playersays something about our great coaching staff Re: Mike Ford on the radar --------------------------------------------------------------------------------you guys are still talking about himforget ithe hasnt produced yet he aint producing next yearhttp://thebullspen.com/index.php?topic=60121.0;all---------------------------------------------------------------------------------So which is it? LOL. But he'll be the first to say whatever it is someone else says about Ford at a later date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The New "U" Posted April 17, 2009 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 219 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/04/2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 So you're going out on a limb and saying he'll either succeed or fail? Nice...as for smazza, as already pointed out, he said in another thread that Ford won't amount to anything.I agree smazza is all over the place. That's who he is lol.Regardless, my statement while obvious makes sense in the context here. Smazza said he'd be nothing here and would excel in the pros (more or less). Thus, he gave the picture of inverse association. I simply noted that however he does here is what he'll also do in the pros. Contrary to smazza's statement.Thanks for trying to rip me though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.