smazza Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,073 Reputation: 2,431 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted November 16, 2008 he simply cant get it done at this levelthere is no shame because most couldnt do it eitherhe needs to recognize that and resignhe will get a job as head coach for non bcs team or lowly bcs teamit has been obvious to me for awhile but now it obvious to most Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebouncer1898 Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,633 Reputation: 8 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/01/2005 Share Posted November 16, 2008 I think with a quality coaching staff behind him he would do much better.The problem is the guys in the background. They are a bunch of dopes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donkey hote Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 18 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/26/2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 Maybe he is an example of the "Peter Principal". It happens all the time in business & government. He was promoted to the level of his incompetency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gainesvillebull Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 1,829 Reputation: 29 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/06/2005 Share Posted November 16, 2008 he simply cant get it done at this levelthere is no shame because most couldnt do it eitherhe needs to recognize that and resignhe will get a job as head coach for non bcs team or lowly bcs teamit has been obvious to me for awhile but now it obvious to most YES!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skingraft Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 13,357 Reputation: 2,482 Days Won: 63 Joined: 12/11/2006 Share Posted November 16, 2008 once again agree....good coach, but not great....and as far as asst coaches, he picked them so he is responsible.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Admin Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 96,982 Reputation: 10,802 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted November 16, 2008 Most sane people are not on the board following a loss because of the repetitive moaning and blaming threads.Hence, you won't see much disagreement with smazza's continued 7 year rant against Jim Leavitt. Like with anything, one should consider the full body of work, and make their judgments accordingly. Again, it's clear that several drank the preseason hype koolaid about the abilities of this team and now feel betrayed and hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull-by-Marriage Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Bull Backers Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 4,741 Reputation: 127 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/25/2004 Share Posted November 16, 2008 While I understand the "full body of work" argument. IMO it doesn't hold water in this instance. Leavitt has brought USF football higher, and faster than most could have realistically expected. However, that doesn't mean that he can or will be able to get us to the next level. Winning 8 or 9 games a year might be OK for some of you, but it will not be OK for 99.9% of Florida HS recruits. If we can hope to compete for some of the big name players, we will have to consisitently win 9, 10 or more games a year. I for one am not satisfied with the product on the field. I think that Woolard should tell Leavitt, either start new with at least the O staff, or you are gone. That simple. IMO if the team continues to "max out" at 9 wins a year, then they can build a 30K seat OCS, and have a hard time filling it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 66,073 Reputation: 2,431 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 Most sane people are not on the board following a loss because of the repetitive moaning and blaming threads.Hence, you won't see much disagreement with smazza's continued 7 year rant against Jim Leavitt. Like with anything, one should consider the full body of work, and make their judgments accordingly. Again, it's clear that several drank the preseason hype koolaid about the abilities of this team and now feel betrayed and hurt.Hence, you won't see much disagreement with smazza's continued 7 year rant against Jim Leavitt. Like with anything, one should consider the full body of work, and make their judgments accordingly. Again, it's clear that several drank the preseason hype koolaid about the abilities of this team and now feel betrayed and hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Admin Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 96,982 Reputation: 10,802 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted November 16, 2008 I think most have run for the hills because of the bitterness displayed on the board. I can't run, because I am partly responsible for what people type here - I have to moderate it. I wouldn't even come here to listen to the arrogance and ignorance if I didn't have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Posted November 16, 2008 Group: Admin Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 96,982 Reputation: 10,802 Days Won: 469 Joined: 05/19/2000 Share Posted November 16, 2008 the reasons the leavitt supporters have run from the hills are manya.they can no longer defend leavittb.they are embarrased to have backed him and they must now admit they were wrong(very tough for some people to do)c.the reason you cite isnt one of themd.i can go onand onc and d make for a longer list, but not sure it means much to anyone other than you. I think a lot of people can defend Leavitt; that they choose not to come here and be the subject of raging vitriol from anonymous hooligans means nothing. I am sure that some have changed their opinions regarding Leavitt - a little here or a lot there, but I also believe many take a much longer term view of the program, and to not grade it as a must win 10 games per year to be considered successful at this stage in its development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.