This is a KEEPER!

[Mama_Bull]

USC #1 and USF #2.

Division I FBS Rank = September 14, 2008

Power = Team's current Power Rating(predictive)

Sched = Strength of opponents played to date

        includes adjustment for home & away

WLRtg = BCS-style won-lost rating(adjust for OT)

KCFR  = Hybrid of Power & WLRtg produces this

        hypothetical rank (Power has more input

        early season and WLRtg more input later)

rank _Division I FBS_____ W-L Power Sched WLRtg KCFR

1 U S C -------------- 2-0 103.67 81.99 106.99 104.50

2 South Florida ------ 3-0 100.89 78.81 102.77 101.52

3 Florida ------------ 2-0 102.49 70.19 95.19 100.66

4 Oklahoma ----------- 3-0 104.58 66.84 91.84 100.34

5 Missouri ----------- 3-0 99.01 66.34 91.34 96.46

6 Brigham Young ------ 3-0 94.54 69.67 94.67 94.58

7 Georgia ------------ 3-0 93.11 72.51 97.51 94.57

8 Texas Tech --------- 3-0 97.01 64.16 89.16 94.39

9 L S U -------------- 2-0 96.93 60.62 85.62 94.10

10 Kansas ------------- 2-1 99.14 74.20 82.53 93.61

http://home.att.net/~keepers.football/wsb/html/view.cgi-html2.html--SiteID-887011.html

Also, College Football ranking comparison now has USF #9.

http://www.mratings.com/cf/compare.htm

[SRQ]

fiu ain't gonna help this!

[Velcro]

if that is a "predictive" ranking, as it says above... then I believe it is looking into the future, thus FIU is included already.

This is predicting where the teams will be ranked at the end of the year based on their full schedule.

[BULLSHTR]

USC #1 and USF #2.

Division I FBS Rank = September 14, 2008

Power = Team's current Power Rating(predictive)

Sched = Strength of opponents played to date

        includes adjustment for home & away

WLRtg = BCS-style won-lost rating(adjust for OT)

KCFR  = Hybrid of Power & WLRtg produces this

        hypothetical rank (Power has more input

        early season and WLRtg more input later)

rank _Division I FBS_____ W-L Power Sched WLRtg KCFR

1 U S C -------------- 2-0 103.67 81.99 106.99 104.50

2 South Florida ------ 3-0 100.89 78.81 102.77 101.52

3 Florida ------------ 2-0 102.49 70.19 95.19 100.66

4 Oklahoma ----------- 3-0 104.58 66.84 91.84 100.34

5 Missouri ----------- 3-0 99.01 66.34 91.34 96.46

6 Brigham Young ------ 3-0 94.54 69.67 94.67 94.58

7 Georgia ------------ 3-0 93.11 72.51 97.51 94.57

8 Texas Tech --------- 3-0 97.01 64.16 89.16 94.39

9 L S U -------------- 2-0 96.93 60.62 85.62 94.10

10 Kansas ------------- 2-1 99.14 74.20 82.53 93.61

http://home.att.net/~keepers.football/wsb/html/view.cgi-html2.html--SiteID-887011.html

Also, College Football ranking comparison now has USF #9.

http://www.mratings.com/cf/compare.htm

[BullDoug]

Take care of business one game at a time and this is possible.  SEC (GA, TN, LSU, FL, Auburn and AL) & Big 12 teams (MO, OUvsTX) will knock ea. other off.  Big Ten ain't got much...maybe WI or PSU.

[MechanicalBull]

Can you imagine SC vs SF for the NC. 

[Bull Martin]

Can you imagine SC vs SF for the NC.   

To be honest I'd rather take the sugar bowl against an ACC team and blow their doors off.  Maybe USC can lose 2 somehow and we could get in to the NC against the Overrated Sports University Luck-eyes.

[Sunil]

Can you imagine SC vs SF for the NC.   

Oh no! Not a "directional" matchup! the traditionalists would be up in arms!!! 

[RicanBull]

Can you imagine SC vs SF for the NC.   

Oh no! Not a "directional" matchup! the traditionalists would be up in arms!!! 

lol

[mutt]

Can you imagine SC vs SF for the NC.   

sc < SF