Matt Posted July 17, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 12,291 Reputation: 63 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/01/2003 Share Posted July 17, 2008 well Barry won't be signing with the Yankees cause they just signed Richie Sextonhttp://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/blog/big_league_stew/post/Richie-Sexson-not-Barry-Bonds-is-your-newest-Y;_ylt=AnW4gd3.wVuTEB82T4Jbi1M5nYcB?urn=mlb,94440Richie Sexson, not Barry Bonds, will be your newest YankeeBy 'Duk This morning, a blog I had previously never heard of  MLB News Online  posted an item saying that Barry Bonds and the Yankees were close to a deal and that it was "anticipated forthwith." I didn't put much stock into the site's "confidential clubhouse source" and that was before my Y! Sports colleague Tim Brown backed up my hunch with good evidence.While sniffing out the report's validity (or lack thereof), Brown was told by Bonds' agent Jeff Borris that the rumor was "not true." Furthermore, it appears that the league remains united in turning its back to the Home Run King. "I’m not in negotiations with the Yankees," Borris told Yahoo! Sports. "I’m not in negotiations with anybody.â€ÂBut while the Yankees might not be interested in bringing Bonds and creating a circus in the Bronx Zoo, a high-level Yankees source told Brown that signing Richie Sexson, who was released by the Mariners last week, was imminent. ESPN's Buster Olney is reporting that Sexson-to-the-Yankees is a done deal, so it appears that Bonds remains free to be second half rumor-fodder for at least a little while longer.Might it be time to fire up The Barry Bonds Job Watch series again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicanBull Posted July 17, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 760 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/07/2008 Share Posted July 17, 2008 Thats a Blah move in my opinion. But we need an outfielder cause of injuries. Bonds would of been interesting. Imagine how tall Sexton will look in pinstripes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJWGoBulls Posted July 17, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 743 Reputation: 6 Days Won: 1 Joined: 02/04/2004 Share Posted July 17, 2008 For $150,000 there is nothing to lose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velcro Posted July 17, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 19,229 Reputation: 7 Days Won: 1 Joined: 01/14/2002 Share Posted July 17, 2008 certainly the price is right, but if the Mariners don't think he is good enough for them, how on earth could he be good for ny? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mag Pie Posted July 17, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 2,307 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/09/2003 Share Posted July 17, 2008 I don't see the purpose of this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Blingstein Posted July 17, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 3,084 Reputation: 30 Days Won: 2 Joined: 04/21/2008 Share Posted July 17, 2008 I don't see the purpose of this...Me neither....yuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted July 18, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 12,291 Reputation: 63 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/01/2003 Author Share Posted July 18, 2008 certainly the price is right, but if the Mariners don't think he is good enough for them, how on earth could he be good for ny?by cutting him and having him sign with another team the mariners just saved themselves 6.9 million dollars....thats why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted July 18, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 64,903 Reputation: 2,101 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted July 18, 2008 sexton will still hit .200 while bonds would have been on base 50% and made entire line up betterif old man was runningshow bonds would be a yankee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicanBull Posted July 18, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 760 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/07/2008 Share Posted July 18, 2008 sexton will still hit .200 while bonds would have been on base 50% and made entire line up betterif old man was runningshow bonds would be a yankeeSomething's wrong....this just made sense... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicanBull Posted July 18, 2008 Group: Member Topic Count: 0 Content Count: 760 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/07/2008 Share Posted July 18, 2008 I don't see the purpose of this...Well you must see that we obviously need an OF (and another bat). If you dont want bonds, then Sexson is the next option. Note: Its Sexson not Sexton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.