UCF ranked #69 by Rivals

[Matt]

http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=815979

and 9 teams in the bottom 60 from C-USA, including 4 teams ranked 107 or worse

i cant describe how glad i am that we arent in that terrible league anymore

[BullGate]

Amen and Go Bulls.

[TyBull]

ucIf "69" = POETIC JUSTICE

[crambone]

lol

[Bull Martin]

They are lucky in one regard.

They don’t have to wait another week for rivals to release their top 25...

[Matt]

it will be interesting to see where we end up on rivals list.  for whatever reason they always have us higher than we should (and by higher i mean a higher number)

[Brad]

http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=815979

and 9 teams in the bottom 60 from C-USA, including 4 teams ranked 107 or worse

i cant describe how glad i am that we arent in that terrible league anymore

It wasn't even that bad when we were in it.  Losing Lousiville and Cincinnati and adding UTEP, Rice, and whoever else was a deathwish for C-USA.  UCiF was a good gamble for that conference, but how they came up with the rest - other than sheer desperation - is beyond me.

[Jamie]

They were obviously desperate to get to 12 teams to get their precious conference championship game, no matter how terrible the teams were that they would have to take on.

They added SMU (horrible), Rice (horrible), UTEP (mediocre), and Marshall (mediocre) along with UCF.

[Bull Martin]

They were obviously desperate to get to 12 teams to get their precious conference championship game, no matter how terrible the teams were that they would have to take on.

They added SMU (horrible), Rice (horrible), UTEP (mediocre), and Marshall (mediocre) along with UCF.

It's funny.  People claim that the Big East needs more teams for credibility.  Well, it didn't add any credibility to CUSA.  They added a bunch of garbage (outside UCF).  If the Big East adds any more teams all we'll have to pick from is garbage.  There are no eastern non-BCS teams worth a ****.  UCF could easily develop as we did in a BCS conference, but they would then be fighting for our recruits (USF doesn't want that).

Teams could develop, but Temple was in a BCS league for years as is Duke and some other bottom feeders.  Teams don’t' all magically get good with the BCS tag.

In a few years when Cincy finally gets good recognition along with UConn the Big East would have enough credibility to let in a bottom feeder or two, but not at the moment.

[SANJAY]

Don't forget that TCU was in the old cusa too.