Big East & USF quietly secure millions

[TyBull]

The Charleston Gazette Wrote:

Big East quietly secure millions

By Mitch Vingle

Sports Editor

May 7, 2008

THE BIG EAST'S eight football schools quietly locked up a boatload of money last week.

And almost no one noticed.

"It was," said West Virginia athletic director Ed Pastilong, "monumental."

Perhaps appropriately, Pastilong spoke while attending a Fiesta Bowl function in Phoenix. That's the same city in which, four years earlier, the Bowl Championship Series handlers announced a three-pronged evaluation would be applied to member leagues after the 2007 season.

Because of the then-crippled Big East.

Last week, however, without fanfare, BCS officials reaffirmed the participation of the six leagues currently involved through the end of the 2013 season. That includes the Big East.

The reinvention of the league since the 2003 purge is complete. And one can now call it a complete success.

The reason is simple: no one noticed the news. No one questioned the Big East's place at the adult table. The reaffirmation wasn't even a note in BCS meeting coverage.

"It was quiet,'' Big East commissioner Mike Tranghese said Tuesday. "The way I like it."

It was both quiet and satisfying.

Just like the unreported numbers-crunching that led to the reaffirmation.

"We had a formal [evaluation] process in December," Tranghese said. "No one made much of it. All of us [bCS officials] elected not to make a big deal of it.''

That's how Tranghese promised the process would be handled right after details of the three-pronged evaluation process were announced a few years back.

"We've been careful not to discuss specifics too much because we don't want the media to speculate," said the commissioner.

Mission accomplished.

"It's a complicated formula," Tranghese said Tuesday. "It's an analysis we agreed not to talk about. But it has to do with the performance in bowls, Top 25 teams, the conference rankings ... It's all football related. You have to reach particular levels."

The prongs as explained after the 2004 Phoenix meetings: a four-year average of each league's highest ranked team, the number of each league's Top 25 teams and the average BCS ranking of all members.

"Exactly," Tranghese said. "Everything has weighted values."

And these days the Big East is a heavyweight. So the weight has been lifted from those like the commissioner and Pastilong.

"[bCS membership] means security for the future," Pastilong said. "It means being in a position to vie for a national championship. It's very important."

Especially for his state of mind. Neither he nor Tranghese forget the directive issued by a BCS committee that said "beginning with the 1999 regular season, each BCS conference is subject to review and possible loss of automatic selection by the BCS should the conference champion not have an average ranking of 12 or higher over a four-year period." It was tabbed the "Big East rule."

Then came 2003, when the Atlantic Coast Conference raided the league. First Miami and Virginia Tech left. Then Boston College.

"There was anxiety," Pastilong remembers. "There was anxiety in regard to our conference, which trickled to us. That trickled to our followers. This [bCS membership] affects so much. It affects the overall strength of a conference and how a program is looked at."

The Big East landed a reprieve in 2004, after the breakup, when the BCS granted a stay through 2007. But the media heat remained and the committee felt compelled to release details of the standards.

"It was a very difficult period," Tranghese said. "All I said at the time was there's no sense fussing about it. Just put your nose to work and win games."

"Things are significantly better now.''

The commissioner pointed to the league's three straight BCS bowl victories. He pointed to "two incredibly great seasons."

And he pointed to the beautiful sound of silence when the Big East was again included among the BCS partners.

"Now," he said, "no one even discusses it."

To contact sports editor Mitch Vingle, send e-mail to mitchvingle@wvgazette.com or call (304) 348-4827.

[RicanBull]

I'm glad they realized that they would have no real argument to take the bid away.

Go Big East...GO BULLS!

[dabull80]

ACC better pick it up or they might be next to get "pronged"

[crambone]

ACC better pick it up or they might be next to get "pronged"

+1

[Bull Martin]

ACC better pick it up or they might be next to get "pronged"

+1

I'd look at the Big Ten first.  The ACC has more potential imo.

[Ruger7mmmag]

The ACC will be fine.  You don't have two FL schools in it with those reps and recruiting classes stay down for long.  The talent they've been pulling lately along with those coaching changes will make a difference.  With teams like USF pulling more talent and making it harder for some of these kids to go FAR away, as Bull said above, the Big Ten is more in danger than anyone. 

With the parity that's coming, no one will really have an argument worth changing the situation at hand enough to make any changes.  The key was being in and getting that 3 year "extension".  It'll be harder than ever with parity for other leagues to get in on it with the schedules they have.

[IncrediBULL]

This is good news.  Futher separates us from CUSA and other non-bcs conferences.  5 years gives us a lot of time to improve recruiting and use this as a tool to do so. 

Ie, Do you want to play on ESPN and have a shot at a NC,  or would you like to have no TV, no NC shot, and be relegated to a crappy bowl game that has no top 10 tie in (ie see Hawaii) because you are not equal to the top...

This is great news for all USF sports.

[SRQ]

silence can be golden

[Jihme]

with our bowl records and our OOC records, there isn't much that they can hang their hat on to kick us out.

[bulls96go]

from 2003 to now the BE has been better (record wise) than ACC, Big12 and poss Big 10

hope our bowl situation improves $$$ and match-ups.