Jump to content

  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Over-night that contract if?

tilden61

Recommended Posts

nobull.Bulls Toro Magnifico

nobull.Bulls

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,241
  • Reputation:   60
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/02/2007
Posted

Leavitt, doesn't want the OOC schedule to be more difficult than necessary. Right now we have a good enough future BCS OOC slate. There has to be a mix of OOC opponents from easy to hard, so as not to overtax our players heading into conference play.

I know and I understand why our schedule is the way it is. I am just saying that I disagree with that philosophy. There are plenty of teams who have tough schedules in BCS conferences who are not afraid to go out and schedule some tough OOC games. USC, Tennessee, and Auburn immediately come to mind.

leavitt is afraid to play big boys more than he has to

is there really any doubt

usf hasnt done well against big boys(save auburn)

overtaxing players?????? come on

leavitt is afraid to play the big boys more than he has to

is there really any doubt

usf hasnt done well against big boys(save auburn)

overtaxing players?????? come on

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply
smazza Toro Magnifico

smazza

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  66,072
  • Reputation:   2,429
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001
Posted

Leavitt, doesn't want the OOC schedule to be more difficult than necessary. Right now we have a good enough future BCS OOC slate. There has to be a mix of OOC opponents from easy to hard, so as not to overtax our players heading into conference play.

I know and I understand why our schedule is the way it is. I am just saying that I disagree with that philosophy. There are plenty of teams who have tough schedules in BCS conferences who are not afraid to go out and schedule some tough OOC games. USC, Tennessee, and Auburn immediately come to mind.

big east isnt eactly a tough conference

ftu/ou/oc,1aaaaa game 

sorry too many patsies

you want notoriety you need to go and play a power in their home and beat them like bulls did to auburn last year

leavitt is afraid to play big boys more than he has to

is there really any doubt

usf hasnt done well against big boys(save auburn)

overtaxing players?????? come on

leavitt is afraid to play the big boys more than he has to

is there really any doubt

usf hasnt done well against big boys(save auburn)

overtaxing players?????? come on

About every top 25 team plays a 1aa team at the beginning of the season, a warm up game. Then the real season begins, and our scheduling and future scheduling has been putting top notch programs against us.

How does Florida in 2010, Notre Dame in 2011, a 4 year deal with Miami, and our game this season against Kansas make

leavitt afraid to play big boys more than he has to?

You must've mean Ohio State HC Jim Tressel

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Who'sYourData? Toro Magnifico

Who'sYourData?

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006
Posted

OK. WTF is happening in this thread right now?

In local parlance, this thread has been smazza'd.  :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mikebeau Toro Magnifico

mikebeau

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  4,738
  • Reputation:   9
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/01/2007
Posted

OK. WTF is happening in this thread right now?

In local parlance, this thread has been smazza'd.  :o

next smazza will pump up the Pac-10

too bad half the teams in that conf should be in 1aa

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bull94 Toro Magnifico

Bull94

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005
Posted

financially it would probably be a bad move for us as it was for Rutgers.

Why split revenue with N.D. at a neutral site?

Rutgers would definitely make more by playing a 1-aa team at home.

We might as well. UCONN sees it as a way to make a little more and get the national recognition. Same with Cincy. They have a small stadium and they will make more by getting half the revenue at a pro stadium than they would by playing at home.

College football is all dollars and cents now. The NCAA should mandate that all d-1 teams play no more than 6 home games. It's getting ridiculous with big programs playing 8 home games just to fill their schedule with cupcakes and get the payday. Force them to go on the road OOC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mama_Bull Toro Magnifico

Mama_Bull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  18,470
  • Reputation:   899
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/14/2003
Posted

USF is the one-N.D.vs.USF

Getting back to the original question, Brett checked and it is NOT USF:

Other Big East notes: Notre Dame AD Kevin White was quoted recently by the South Bend Tribune after the Rutgers-Notre Dame series was squashed. “So we just moved on,†he said. “I think we had somebody else in 10 seconds.†White declined to name the school until contracts are signed, but he did say it was another Big East school, the South Bend Tribune reported. I checked with USF officials and it is not USF. Best guess here is that it’s Syracuse. ...

http://www.tboblogs.com/index.php/sports/comments/big-east-bowl-primer/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.

Got it!
Dismiss