Jump to content
What's New
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

What is our situation at receiver this weekend?


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,260
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/20/2006

Anyone know the early word on Amarri's injury? If he's out..that leaves us starting Hester and Edwards? Bogan, Mitchell and Alcin backing up? Where has Courtney Denson been? Paging Colby Erskin....  :-\

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  1,296
  • Reputation:   117
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/17/2007

They best situate themselves in the endzone a buncha times. I think they will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  3,827
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/08/2003

Q: What is our situation at receiver this weekend?

A: Better than it was at the start of the UConn game. No Amarri means an instant talent upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,160
  • Reputation:   253
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/09/2007

i think Hester, Edwards and Mitchell will be our starters...  GET THE BALL TO JESSE PLEASE!!!

and i'd like to see more plays to Ced...  obviously i wouldn't look for him in the endzone (DRRRRRROP!!), but he has impressed me this year with some huge drive sustaining catches--- Rutgers and UConn to name a few.

i'm concerned about the Ford...  once he gets healthy, i think now is the time to give him more carries (i.e. Auburn).

ps- paging Colby Erskin won't help us this year...  he's rehabing the ACL he tore in practice late last summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  17,044
  • Reputation:   2,985
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

Hester, Edwards and Mitchell have really stepped up.  I am liking these guys.  That said, TJ is the man and I hope he gets better soon so they can really start rocking again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  9,657
  • Reputation:   537
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  08/05/2005

Q: What is our situation at receiver this weekend?

A: Better than it was at the start of the UConn game. No Amarri means an instant talent upgrade.

Easy Shoop, Amarri wasn't the one that dropped a giftwrapped TD pass this weekend, it was C Hill.  Mitchell and Bogan will be good but they are still Freshmen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  3,827
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/08/2003

Cedric Hill is a TE. We're talking about WRs here.

Amarri has done nothing BUT drop passes(and catch WR screens, where he jukes and jives and falls down where he started) this year. Freshmen or not, our young WRs are infinitely better at their position than the senior who is......well, tall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  3,030
  • Reputation:   301
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  11/24/2005

Difference is Ced caught some balls before that.  Let's say, 3 catches one drop maybe.  If it was Amarri he would have had 1 catch, 3 drops.

LOVE our WR situation going into this week.  Hope these boys prove they don't need the vets back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  416
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/08/2007

C. Hill looked like a better position threat over the middle than Amarri has. That's been a weak point for us and it was great to see it improving. The Hill drop on the goal line was tough but I think he deserves more chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  5,160
  • Reputation:   253
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/09/2007

Cedric Hill is a TE. We're talking about WRs here.

whoaaa...  thanks for the correction, semantics guy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...