Big East Champion?

[outrunner]

Ok, I understand the whole technical reasons behind this, but I still think this is just wrong.

Rutgers beat Louisville

Louisville finished 11-1 (6-1 in BE)

Rutgers could finish 11-1 (6-1 in BE) (*this assuming they beat WV later today)

Rutgers gets the BCS bid.

But they are both considered co-Conference Champions.

There should be only ONE conference champion, an if the above happens, it should be Rutgers and Rutgers alone. Louisville does not deserve to have that banner made. In the length of history it will end up being "Conference Champion". The "co" will eventually be dropped and people forget the sharing part.

Much like Pitt and WV a few years ago, both are co-champions, but Pitt went to the BCS.

West Virgnia was claiming they were going for their 3rd straight BE title this season. Technically true, but misleading. How about USC, co-national champions?

There can only be ONE champion. ONE winner.

[Guest]

Unfortunately, that is not the way things work when you don't have a playoff to determine the champion.  Last year, Ohio State and Penn State were co-champions of the Big East.  

[E.T.]

Big 10 (Plus 1)  

There are co-national champions even  

[bulls96go]

leave it alone

i don't mind a shared championship