E.T. Posted August 27, 2006 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 4,702 Content Count: 37,099 Reputation: 2,045 Days Won: 29 Joined: 12/24/2001 Share Posted August 27, 2006 Okay ... looking at a 6 game suspension for each:Ponton - The loss of depth and experience will hurt. Just hoping that the others are strong and that Plancher can carry the bulk for the first 6 games. This will also allow Ponton time to heal the injury and be fresh for the remaining 6 games.Chambers - This is actually less of a loss with the depth we have a WR. Biggest area may be the return game. But feel good with the other we have. And again, we wil have a first talented body for the last 6 games.Julmiste - The BIGGEST loss of the 3. This will really test the reserves here.REALLY glad we have these first 2 games to get these positions in shape.Go BULLS !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullsmania Posted August 27, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 151 Content Count: 2,699 Reputation: 17 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/23/2001 Share Posted August 27, 2006 I'm glad you can find the positive in this ET. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullsFanInTX Posted August 27, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 222 Content Count: 4,210 Reputation: 647 Days Won: 8 Joined: 08/17/2006 Share Posted August 27, 2006 I agree with ET, the first 2 losses aren't that big IF MP and the rest of the recievers step it up and are as good as we have been told. J. Julmiste could be a huge loss. If they only miss 2 games instead of 6, we should be able to get by ok due to our schedule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullpride08 Posted August 27, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 38 Content Count: 4,016 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/20/2002 Share Posted August 27, 2006 If the rumors are true Josh and Jackie were to get 2 games, and Ponton 4-6. We shall see.If it's only two for the first two guys that is fine. It will give the back-ups at their positions some quality experience and learning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulls96go Posted August 27, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 724 Content Count: 10,219 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/17/2002 Share Posted August 27, 2006 none > Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted August 27, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,826 Content Count: 65,408 Reputation: 2,225 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted August 27, 2006 this is not goodjosh j was a preseason all big east selection if they miss a month or more they wont figure into team plans since their bACK ups have taken their placeif i wer ecoach i would amp up anti drug programthere is obviouly a problem when your better players are getting suspendedthe positive test is a symptom of a more serious problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted August 27, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,826 Content Count: 65,408 Reputation: 2,225 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted August 27, 2006 et-let me know when you find a positive from this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E.T. Posted August 27, 2006 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 4,702 Content Count: 37,099 Reputation: 2,045 Days Won: 29 Joined: 12/24/2001 Author Share Posted August 27, 2006 ...josh j was a preseason all big east selection... :question [smiley=smiley_up.gif]The article said 3 starters ... we know that it's not a big drop off at WR ... JJ had promise, but hadn't started, but he stil his the biggest lose due to depth ... Ponton may be the biggest loss regarding starting power because of what he has done last season, but the Plancher talk was very good last year.Ready for them Cowboys !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D1DDY Posted August 27, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 34 Content Count: 701 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/11/2005 Share Posted August 27, 2006 this is not goodjosh j was a preseason all big east selection if they miss a month or more they wont figure into team plans since their bACK ups have taken their placeif i wer ecoach i would amp up anti drug programthere is obviouly a problem when your better players  are getting suspendedthe positive test is a symptom of a more serious problemsecond. there is nothing positive... the PR alone makes it worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubanbull Posted August 27, 2006 Group: Member Topic Count: 293 Content Count: 6,658 Reputation: 952 Days Won: 21 Joined: 12/23/2001 Share Posted August 27, 2006 I would had much rather have heard that they were suspended for team rules violations and not get their names tied in to drug suspensions. Thats how most schools do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now