BDYZR Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 488 Content Count: 12,455 Reputation: 2,840 Days Won: 25 Joined: 12/14/2005 Share Posted January 20, 2020 26 minutes ago, El_Toro_86 said: They prioritized and invested in Athletics - IPF, OCS, etc - while USF rested on our laurels athletically and invested more in Academics and that has born fruit with Preeminence status, but athletically we are woefully behind and have a lot of catching up to do. This all starts at the top and permeates down. With MK in charge and a new President, I think things will change but it will take time. THIS ↑ And Mark Harlan. I think he alone set us back at least 10 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheBus Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 15 Content Count: 740 Reputation: 185 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/02/2011 Share Posted January 20, 2020 (edited) 58 minutes ago, El_Toro_86 said: They prioritized and invested in Athletics - IPF, OCS, etc - while USF rested on our laurels athletically and invested more in Academics and that has born fruit with Preeminence status, but athletically we are woefully behind and have a lot of catching up to do. This all starts at the top and permeates down. With MK in charge and a new President, I think things will change but it will take time. We did make a point of investing in athletics..... Woolard put about $70m into the new Soccer, Baseball/Softball stadiums, the Sun Dome renovation, and more. The reinvention of USF's "athletic village" was Woolard's crowning achievement... USF made a concerted effort to invest in athletic facilities on campus for every single sport except the one that matters. Imagine where we could be now if Woolard made football a priority. Edited January 20, 2020 by OnTheBus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smazza Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 9,895 Content Count: 66,073 Reputation: 2,431 Days Won: 172 Joined: 01/01/2001 Share Posted January 20, 2020 We should gave never stopped playing them in football.that was mistake. They emphasized athletics Usf made a series of bad hires Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CousinRicky Posted January 20, 2020 Group: TBP Subscriber III Topic Count: 582 Content Count: 22,677 Reputation: 5,813 Days Won: 108 Joined: 09/13/2007 Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 hour ago, El_Toro_86 said: They prioritized and invested in Athletics - IPF, OCS, etc - while USF rested on our laurels athletically and invested more in Academics and that has born fruit with Preeminence status, but athletically we are woefully behind and have a lot of catching up to do. This all starts at the top and permeates down. With MK in charge and a new President, I think things will change but it will take time. I'm not sure we are that far behind. Just took both of their hoops teams to the end of games. Football has a bit farther to go but we'll see in 2 years where that stands. Our basketball teams would both greatly benefit by having a kid or two that can shoot straight. Otherwise we're close there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted January 20, 2020 2 hours ago, El_Toro_86 said: They prioritized and invested in Athletics - IPF, OCS, etc - while USF rested on our laurels athletically and invested more in Academics and that has born fruit with Preeminence status, but athletically we are woefully behind and have a lot of catching up to do. This all starts at the top and permeates down. With MK in charge and a new President, I think things will change but it will take time. This is the correct answer. We had our BCS moment and pissed it all away. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted January 20, 2020 27 minutes ago, CousinRicky said: I'm not sure we are that far behind. Just took both of their hoops teams to the end of games. Football has a bit farther to go but we'll see in 2 years where that stands. Our basketball teams would both greatly benefit by having a kid or two that can shoot straight. Otherwise we're close there. Until we actually start winning we are behind. In terms of football it is starting to look like the Iron Bowl of the 1970s when Bama beat Auburn like 10 times in a row. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mission9 Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 60 Content Count: 4,074 Reputation: 467 Days Won: 2 Joined: 12/09/2003 Share Posted January 20, 2020 11 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said: Until we actually start winning we are behind. In terms of football it is starting to look like the Iron Bowl of the 1970s when Bama beat Auburn like 10 times in a row. So, are we doomed to keep losing to them until we have our "Bo Over the Top" moment? Oy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMW Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 39 Content Count: 2,112 Reputation: 915 Days Won: 6 Joined: 09/14/2007 Share Posted January 20, 2020 1 hour ago, OnTheBus said: We did make a point of investing in athletics..... Woolard put about $70m into the new Soccer, Baseball/Softball stadiums, the Sun Dome renovation, and more. The reinvention of USF's "athletic village" was Woolard's crowning achievement... USF made a concerted effort to invest in athletic facilities on campus for every single sport except the one that matters. Imagine where we could be now if Woolard made football a priority. Can someone explain to me how we would have won more games if we spent more money on football? Not being argumentative I just don't understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheBus Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 15 Content Count: 740 Reputation: 185 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/02/2011 Share Posted January 20, 2020 8 minutes ago, MMW said: Can someone explain to me how we would have won more games if we spent more money on football? Not being argumentative I just don't understand. We could have invested in an IPF during Woolard's spending spree. If you want to say that wouldn't have been beneficial over the past decade, then I'm not sure why anyone is clamoring for it now. I'm being facetious of course, we stand to benefit from it as much now as we would have if Woolard made it a priority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostbuster Posted January 20, 2020 Group: Member Topic Count: 23 Content Count: 730 Reputation: 438 Days Won: 4 Joined: 09/07/2010 Share Posted January 20, 2020 3 hours ago, Dave_Glaser said: . . . about how we’ve gotten to the current state of our “rivalry” with Oviedo Community College. For the better part of 40 years, we dominated this matchup in nearly every sport, with a few exceptions, yet somehow it is now lopsided in their favor. Super simple. 1. Collapse of the Big East. Goodbye USF recruiting advantage. 2. UCF has cheated in every sense to get ahead in football. (Which is the money maker and 'front porch' of the university) From cheating on the construction of facilities (building dangerously unsafe stadium) to cheating to get recruits (receiving post season ban for recruiting violations and then getting off on a technicality) to cheating on funding buildings (breaking Florida law) to cheating on how they report metrics (claiming higher grades) to cheating their way to a ******natty (by just claiming one and ignoring the rules). The simple answer is cheating does work. Look at the Houston Astros, the Red Sox, the Patriots... All cheated to win and all got away with it. UCF's cheating got them competitive advantages (money, publicity, more NFL graduates to use as recruiting stats) that they reap to this day. Yeah Scott Frost was a stellar coach anyways for them, but his accomplishments were still on top of their cheater pile. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now