NewEnglandBull Posted October 13, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted October 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, puc86 said: So comparing something that has increased to something that you know has not yet increased but will would be fair or not fair? Your welcome to take your loss in a few more weeks if you wish but it is quiet clear from those media consultants who follow these things the number will be “no more than $2.3.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted October 13, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,249 Reputation: 6,138 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted October 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, NewEnglandBull said: Your welcome to take your loss in a few more weeks if you wish but it is quiet clear from those media consultants who follow these things the number will be “no more than $2.3.” That’s not a loss I never claimed it would be equal just that it will be more and the distance between that number and the AAC isn’t as large as the giant schism between the AAC and the P5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted October 13, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted October 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, puc86 said: That’s not a loss I never claimed it would be equal just that it will be more and the distance between that number and the AAC isn’t as large as the giant schism between the AAC and the P5. Actually you stated: “They are going to get a raise, that raise will make them closer to us.” You we’re wrong (or will be wrong in a few weeks)...but whatever... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted October 13, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,249 Reputation: 6,138 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted October 13, 2019 1 minute ago, NewEnglandBull said: Actually you stated: “They are going to get a raise, that raise will make them closer to us.” You we’re wrong (or will be wrong in a few weeks)...but whatever... If it’s a dollar more it will be closer that’s how math works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted October 13, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted October 13, 2019 Just now, puc86 said: If it’s a dollar more it will be closer that’s how math works What are you not understanding? If it’s a dollar more on one end (10%) but the competition gains five dollars more then the net is not closer...Business 101... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELdaBull Posted October 14, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 86 Content Count: 17,061 Reputation: 1,429 Days Won: 19 Joined: 09/15/2005 Share Posted October 14, 2019 Puc makes good points. He is just bad at arguing those points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usf97 Posted October 14, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 179 Content Count: 3,647 Reputation: 456 Days Won: 4 Joined: 02/01/2005 Share Posted October 14, 2019 Since CCS says he lets all the other assistant coaches do all of the coaching, I would anticipate any CCS contract extension discussions would start something like this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted October 14, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,249 Reputation: 6,138 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted October 14, 2019 18 hours ago, NewEnglandBull said: What are you not understanding? If it’s a dollar more on one end (10%) but the competition gains five dollars more then the net is not closer...Business 101... That I am not arguing that point I am arguing that comparing the new on one end and the old on the other end isn’t a fair comparison and it will be unfairly slanted to some degree of which we will determine soon. No one is making a net gain comparison they are simply comparing x to y but x has been increased while y has yet to be increased, that’s not fair and is disingenuous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puc86 Posted October 14, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 147 Content Count: 19,249 Reputation: 6,138 Days Won: 255 Joined: 10/13/2002 Share Posted October 14, 2019 13 minutes ago, DELdaBull said: Puc makes good points. He is just bad at arguing those points. It’s because I am too combative but it’s kind of hard to be one person fighting against several different people on several different subjects at one time, especially when most of the time the other people are simply arguing against your pretty simple, obvious and not controversial ideas for sport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandBull Posted October 14, 2019 Group: Member Topic Count: 1,518 Content Count: 42,125 Reputation: 8,834 Days Won: 344 Joined: 11/29/2009 Share Posted October 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, puc86 said: That I am not arguing that point I am arguing that comparing the new on one end and the old on the other end isn’t a fair comparison and it will be unfairly slanted to some degree of which we will determine soon. No one is making a net gain comparison they are simply comparing x to y but x has been increased while y has yet to be increased, that’s not fair and is disingenuous. Sorry dude the statute of limitations on this topic has passed. You are a day late and a dime short.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now