Hope you all like watching USF football on ESPN+

[George_Bullnard_Shaw]

I might pay $5.00 per month to see it on tv, but not on a stream that will likely be intermittent, delayed, pixellated and unreliable.

I may have some extra free time soon.

[Azmodi]

So, some guy on twitter states that the American is close to signing a deal for "a portion of our Tier 1 content" and everyone if freaking out. I'm quite sure that Aresco knows that if he signed a **** deal this time and relegates the Conferences content to ESPN+, he's gonna be fired. Besides that, The school Presidents have to sign off on the contract. I doubt that any of them would sign off on an exclusive ESPN+ deal.

 

 

It's time to sit back and relax a spell. 

[bullstampede9922]

16 minutes ago, Azmodi said:

So, some guy on twitter states that the American is close to signing a deal for "a portion of our Tier 1 content" and everyone if freaking out. I'm quite sure that Aresco knows that if he signed a **** deal this time and relegates the Conferences content to ESPN+, he's gonna be fired. Besides that, The school Presidents have to sign off on the contract. I doubt that any of them would sign off on an exclusive ESPN+ deal.

 

 

It's time to sit back and relax a spell. 

How dare you bring reason into this conversation!

[BDYZR]

35 minutes ago, Azmodi said:

The school Presidents have to sign off on the contract.

How many new Presidents will the AAC have after July?

[Azmodi]

37 minutes ago, BDYZR said:

How many new Presidents will the AAC have after July?

Two, UCF and USF.

[BDYZR]

59 minutes ago, Azmodi said:

Two, UCF and USF.

I thought there was one more that announced retirement a couple months ago.

[cophbulls]

Not interested in going through all the posts here so someone may have already said this. I have ESPN+ and it is a real nice connection. Maybe its just my mind thinking Im paying for it, i hope its good, but it seems a better quality feed than a reg cable broadcast. 

My biggest ***** is not being able to switch back and forth between games easily. Once you are on ESPN+ you more or less stay there until your event is over. I use it a lot to watch the teams my degenerate habit has become interested in that day. 

[NewEnglandBull]

5 minutes ago, cophbulls said:

Not interested in going through all the posts here so someone may have already said this. I have ESPN+ and it is a real nice connection. Maybe its just my mind thinking Im paying for it, i hope its good, but it seems a better quality feed than a reg cable broadcast. 

My biggest ***** is not being able to switch back and forth between games easily. Once you are on ESPN+ you more or less stay there until your event is over. I use it a lot to watch the teams my degenerate habit has become interested in that day. 

Your last point was one I was thinking about too. I watch a **** ton of college football so switching back and forth is important. However, when USF is playing that is the only game I follow during that time. I do use three other devices to watch games simultaneously (or as much as possible). I am glad to hear that the feed to espn+ is better than ESPN3 as I will have problems with the later at least three to four times during a typical game. 

[Brad]

ESPN+ comes with five simultaneous streams. Your problem may be that you need more TV's.  

[JTrue]

4 minutes ago, Brad said:

ESPN+ comes with five simultaneous streams. Your problem may be that you need more TV's.  

And here I thought the problem was that we have ZERO proof that our games are going to be on ESPN+.

Edited February 20, 2019 by JTrue